Road Cycling · Public discussion

Crank length

Started by TAF · · Last activity · 22 posts · 1,655 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
30 June 2004
Last activity
3 July 2004
Original author
TAF
Posts
22
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,655
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 22
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Anyone have a good formula for determining crank length.

    Also, any idea what the various pros ride?

  2. TAF said:

    Anyone have a good formula for determining crank length.

    Give us your height and we will give you your length...
    Marquis, at some point in the past, said
    The general rule of thumb is:
    * below 5'10 use 170mm cranks on for general (road) racing and
    training,
    * 5'10 to 6'1 use 172.5mm cranks
    * 6'1 plus use 175mm cranks

    Quoted message said:

    Also, any idea what the various pros ride?

    At some point, one of them used longer cranks as a desperate attempt to keep
    up with Merckx, and destroyed his knees...

    Didier

    --
    Didier A Depireux [email hidden] [email hidden]
    20 Penn Str - S218E http://neurobiology.umaryland.edu/depireux.htm
    Anatomy and Neurobiology Phone: 410-706-1272 (lab)
    University of Maryland -1273 (off)
    Baltimore MD 21201 USA Fax: 1-410-706-2512

  3. Didier A. Depireux said:
    TAF said:

    Anyone have a good formula for determining crank length.

    Give us your height and we will give you your length...
    Marquis, at some point in the past, said
    The general rule of thumb is:
    * below 5'10 use 170mm cranks on for general (road) racing and
    training,
    * 5'10 to 6'1 use 172.5mm cranks
    * 6'1 plus use 175mm cranks

    Quoted message said:

    Also, any idea what the various pros ride?

    At some point, one of them used longer cranks as a desperate attempt to
    keep
    up with Merckx, and destroyed his knees...

    Didier

    You sure it wasn't just trying to keep up with Merckx that destroyed his
    knees?

    --
    Bob in CT
    Remove ".x" to reply

  4. http://www.nettally.com/palmk/crankset.html

    this is the formula that i like... you will be riding longer crcnks than
    usually suggested... i am 5'10" and i ride 175s... it works...

  5. Quoted message said:

    http://www.nettally.com/palmk/crankset.html

    this is the formula that i like... you will be riding longer crcnks than
    usually suggested... i am 5'10" and i ride 175s... it works...

    Anybody knows where i can get 200mm cranks?

    "erik saunders" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.nettally.com/palmk/crankset.html

    this is the formula that i like... you will be riding longer crcnks than
    usually suggested... i am 5'10" and i ride 175s... it works...

  6. wacky huh?... this guy's theory makes complete sense to me.. there is a lot to
    read on his website, but he covers a lot of area... i like it because it
    reinforces what i have come to believe through years of riding, racing and
    thinking about a lot of different stupid junk...

    inseam 32- cranks 175mm...

    this guys seems very cool and interesting to me.. i wasted an hour on his site
    when i should have been re-tiling my shower...

  7. "erik saunders" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    this guys seems very cool and interesting to me.. i wasted an hour on his


    site

    Quoted message said:

    when i should have been re-tiling my shower...

    ....or updating *your* web site.

  8. In article <LcIEc.8363$z81.6484@fed1read01>, Mark Fennell

    Quoted message said:

    "erik saunders" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    this guys seems very cool and interesting to me.. i wasted an hour on his


    site

    Quoted message said:

    when i should have been re-tiling my shower...

    ...or updating *your* web site.

    Go over and re-tile his shower and he'll update his website for you.

    -WG
    My newly re-tiled shower is getting grout on Friday. My website will
    have to wait too.

  9. Didier A. Depireux said:
    TAF said:

    Anyone have a good formula for determining crank length.

    Give us your height and we will give you your length...
    Marquis, at some point in the past, said
    The general rule of thumb is:
    * below 5'10 use 170mm cranks on for general (road) racing and
    training,
    * 5'10 to 6'1 use 172.5mm cranks
    * 6'1 plus use 175mm cranks

    I think sizing is typically longer nowadays.

    JT

  10. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    when i should have been re-tiling my shower...

    ...or updating *your* web site.

    why you so funny mark?...

  11. Quoted message said:

    -WG
    My newly re-tiled shower is getting grout on Friday. My website will
    have to wait too.

    mine *might* get grout tomorrow... and my site wont get [censored] for another couple
    of weeks...

  12. "Didier A. Depireux" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    TAF said:

    Anyone have a good formula for determining crank length.

    Give us your height and we will give you your length...
    Marquis, at some point in the past, said
    The general rule of thumb is:
    * below 5'10 use 170mm cranks on for general (road) racing and
    training,
    * 5'10 to 6'1 use 172.5mm cranks
    * 6'1 plus use 175mm cranks

    Quoted message said:

    Also, any idea what the various pros ride?

    At some point, one of them used longer cranks as a desperate attempt to


    keep

    Quoted message said:

    up with Merckx, and destroyed his knees...

    Who are you referring to?

    Quoted message said:


    Didier

    --
    Didier A Depireux [email hidden] [email hidden]
    20 Penn Str - S218E http://neurobiology.umaryland.edu/depireux.htm
    Anatomy and Neurobiology Phone: 410-706-1272 (lab)
    University of Maryland -1273 (off)
    Baltimore MD 21201 USA Fax: 1-410-706-2512

  13. warren <warren@>...

    Quoted message said:
    In Mark Fennell said:

    "erik saunders" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    Quoted message said:

    this guys seems very cool and interesting to me.. i wasted an hour on his


    site

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    when i should have been re-tiling my shower...

    ...or updating *your* web site.

    Go over and re-tile his shower and he'll update his website for you.

    -WG
    My newly re-tiled shower is getting grout on Friday. My website will
    have to wait too.

    If you're like me you'll take photos of your shower
    before and after and post them to your Web site.

    C'mon WG.

    -KJP

  14. In article <[email hidden]>, K. J.

    Papai said:

    warren <warren@>...

    Quoted message said:
    In Mark Fennell said:

    "erik saunders" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > this guys seems very cool and interesting to me.. i wasted an hour on
    > his


    site

    Quoted message said:

    > when i should have been re-tiling my shower...

    ...or updating *your* web site.

    Go over and re-tile his shower and he'll update his website for you.

    -WG
    My newly re-tiled shower is getting grout on Friday. My website will
    have to wait too.

    If you're like me you'll take photos of your shower
    before and after and post them to your Web site.

    C'mon WG.

    We did take pictures, but why you'd want to see them is a little odd to
    me...

    -WG

  15. "erik saunders" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    when i should have been re-tiling my shower...

    ...or updating *your* web site.

    why you so funny mark?...

    One of the few highlights of my dreary miserable existence is hitting yours
    or Nieko's sites and finding new content. How else is a dork like me going
    to hear the funny stuff about US racing that doesn't make it into the 'real'
    press? Just saying...

    Seriously though, yours is in my rotation of 20-30 sites I hit each day and
    I do enjoy your stories and honest perspectives.

  16. "warren" wrote ...

    Quoted message said:


    We did take pictures, but why you'd want to see them is a little odd to
    me...

    But then, you wouldn't create a "Faces of RBR" website either.

    J "me neither" F

  17. Indurain ran 180's for TT'ing and some other stages.

    I did that being the same height (6'-1"😉, I ran 175 on my day to day
    bikes and 180's on my TT bike. Couldn't tell if it really made a
    difference since I was middle of the timing whenever I did TT's. But
    whether it was just a psychological boost, or if it really made a
    difference having longer cranks, I don't know for sure. I was never fast
    enough to justify them .......

    --

  18. In article <nq_Ec.38235$l6.21581@clgrps12>, Jim Flom

    Quoted message said:

    "warren" wrote ...

    Quoted message said:


    We did take pictures, but why you'd want to see them is a little odd to
    me...

    But then, you wouldn't create a "Faces of RBR" website either.

    I like the "Faces" page. Puts a face to the names.
    Not always a good thing...

    -WG

  19. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Daremo said:

    Indurain ran 180's for TT'ing and some other stages.

    I did that being the same height (6'-1"😉, I ran 175 on my day to day
    bikes and 180's on my TT bike. Couldn't tell if it really made a
    difference since I was middle of the timing whenever I did TT's. But
    whether it was just a psychological boost, or if it really made a
    difference having longer cranks, I don't know for sure. I was never fast
    enough to justify them .......

    Indurain is reported to have used 190s when he did his Hour Record
    rides. ( http://www.bikecult.com/bikecultbook/sports_recordsHour.html )

    To me, crank length is about what you, the rider, feels comfortable
    with. I'm 6'0 and I like 177.5s. One thing to think about is that the
    difference between crank lengths is really not that much. A 2.5mm change is
    only 1.45% difference - pretty minimal.

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    "The fickleness of fame and fortune's caprice
    Together changed the life of Mason Reese"
    Alice Donut

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

  20. From Cyclingnews and their Pinarello tour/history article:

    "But Miguel didn't have a very aerodynamic profile... he sat very high
    up compared to today's riders. If he had used the same type of (low)
    position as Olano or Ullrich he would have been even faster in the time
    trials. Indurain used 180mm cranks on this bike; in fact, from May
    onwards, when he was in good form and had more power, he usually
    switched from 177.5mm cranks to 180s. Ullrich does the same thing. After
    Indurain's win in at the '96 Olympics, the entire team used this model
    the following year."

    --

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.