Road Cycling · Public discussion

Museeuw vs. PVP

Started by Tom Kunich · · Last activity · 10 posts · 939 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
12 April 2004
Last activity
13 April 2004
Original author
Tom Kunich
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
939
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. It is pretty funny that those who say "Damn! Musseuw would have won again
    without that flat" don't take into account that PVP would certainly have
    beaten Museeuw in a two up sprint save for that flat.

  2. Tom Kunich said:

    It is pretty funny that those who say "Damn! Musseuw would have won again
    without that flat" don't take into account that PVP would certainly have
    beaten Museeuw in a two up sprint save for that flat.

    Huh? Museeuw flatted out of the lead group, which allowed him to
    be caught by Van Petegem. PVP couldn't have caught the lead group
    on his own. Or at least, he didn't, even with Museeuw to work with.

    The race-aftermath commentary on this group is even more
    omnisciently incoherent than usual today. It's good to see you
    gang have been training hard and are in fine form for July.

    Where's Henry anyway? He would have liked this, but he disappeared
    over a month ago and www.lhchang.com is gone. SDSteve? Anybody?
    Bueller?

  3. Benjamin Weiner said:


    Tom Kunich said:

    It is pretty funny that those who say "Damn! Musseuw would have won again
    without that flat" don't take into account that PVP would certainly have
    beaten Museeuw in a two up sprint save for that flat.

    Huh? Museeuw flatted out of the lead group, which allowed him to
    be caught by Van Petegem. PVP couldn't have caught the lead group
    on his own. Or at least, he didn't, even with Museeuw to work with.

    The race-aftermath commentary on this group is even more
    omnisciently incoherent than usual today. It's good to see you
    gang have been training hard and are in fine form for July.

    tom sometimes will say things to get a certain response he wants. pvp
    had his own flat while off the front on an attack and yet managed to get
    back to the group on his own, drop them, catch museeuw (what happened to
    wesseman btw?). who knows what he would have done without his own bad
    luck flat? maybe he's looking for something like that? if you spend too
    much time trying to guess what he wants you'll go batty, though.

    hh

  4. "h squared" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Benjamin Weiner said:


    Tom Kunich said:

    It is pretty funny that those who say "Damn! Musseuw would have won


    again

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    without that flat" don't take into account that PVP would certainly


    have

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    beaten Museeuw in a two up sprint save for that flat.

    Huh? Museeuw flatted out of the lead group, which allowed him to
    be caught by Van Petegem. PVP couldn't have caught the lead group
    on his own. Or at least, he didn't, even with Museeuw to work with.

    The race-aftermath commentary on this group is even more
    omnisciently incoherent than usual today. It's good to see you
    gang have been training hard and are in fine form for July.

    tom sometimes will say things to get a certain response he wants. pvp
    had his own flat while off the front on an attack and yet managed to get
    back to the group on his own, drop them, catch museeuw (what happened to
    wesseman btw?). who knows what he would have done without his own bad
    luck flat? maybe he's looking for something like that? if you spend too
    much time trying to guess what he wants you'll go batty, though.

    hh

    Tom would often think things had happened that had not. Very frustrating.

  5. "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    It is pretty funny that those who say "Damn! Musseuw would have won again
    without that flat" don't take into account that PVP would certainly have
    beaten Museeuw in a two up sprint save for that flat.

    There no "certainly" in cycling, otherwise Museeuw wouldn't have
    flatted in the last 100s meters of the last pavee section.

  6. "Elizabeth Ann" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Tom would often think things had happened that had not. Very frustrating.

    It's all in the drugs Brian. Everyone that rides a bike except you of
    course, is on drugs. That's why you have to settle for riding wth 12 year
    olds in order to find someone you can beat every once in awhile.

  7. h squared <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    tom sometimes will say things to get a certain response he wants. pvp
    had his own flat while off the front on an attack and yet managed to
    get back to the group on his own, drop them, catch museeuw (what
    happened to wesseman btw?). who knows what he would have done without
    his own bad luck flat? maybe he's looking for something like that? if
    you spend too much time trying to guess what he wants you'll go batty,
    though.

    I think he wants to convince people he is smart and persuade them to his
    point of view. However, if he succeeds on either count, then the reader is
    surely batty to start with.

    But I must be batty since I spent time trying to figure that out.

    NS

  8. "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Elizabeth Ann" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Tom would often think things had happened that had not. Very


    frustrating.

    Quoted message said:


    It's all in the drugs Brian. Everyone that rides a bike except you of
    course, is on drugs. That's why you have to settle for riding wth 12 year
    olds in order to find someone you can beat every once in awhile.

    That is funny coming from the best known cat 5 for lifer.

  9. "Chris" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    That is funny coming from the best known cat 5 for lifer.

    You must have learned a lot about bicycle racing in your long pro career.
    Oh, wait, you're just some flunky amatuer bicycle racer who needs to believe
    that somehow a Cat 3 knows more than a Cat 4. Does it hurt to have a brain
    that puny?

  10. Tom Kunich said:

    "Chris" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:407b3e7a$0$-
    [email hidden]:[email hidden]-
    ntpaccess.com...

    Quoted message said:


    That is funny coming from the best known cat 5 for lifer.


    You must have learned a lot about bicycle racing in your long pro
    career. Oh, wait, you're just some flunky amatuer bicycle racer who
    needs to believe that somehow a Cat 3 knows more than a Cat 4. Does it
    hurt to have a brain that puny?

    Now now girls...handbags at dawn. ..

    From what I could see PvP was miles stronger than JM and in fact he
    looked stronger than anyone else in the race. Like last year he just
    rode through the other riders like an adult in a kids race. There is
    no doubt in my mind that if he had not flatted that he would have
    won again.

    --

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.