Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

How difficult? Dunelt -> Fixie

Started by Vincent M · · Last activity · 6 posts · 525 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
13 July 2004
Last activity
18 July 2004
Original author
Vincent M
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
525
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. How hard would it be to make an older Dunelt frame (it's just the
    frame and fork) into a fixie? I know their an English bike, and I've
    read everything about them at Sheldon - but is there anyhting I'll
    have to look out for when scrounging/buying parts?

    Thanks!

    Vincent

  2. Vincent M said:

    How hard would it be to make an older Dunelt frame (it's just the
    frame and fork) into a fixie? I know their an English bike, and I've
    read everything about them at Sheldon

    _Everything_? ;-)

    Quoted message said:

    - but is there anyhting I'll
    have to look out for when scrounging/buying parts?

    Unless it's a _very_ old Dunelt, it will be a Raleigh product, with the
    Raleigh proprietary threading. If you really have _only_ the frame and
    fork, it's not a pratical choice. If it has a headset and bottom
    bracket cups, it _might_ be a fair candidate.

    There's nothing wrong with the performance or ride of these frames,
    indeed they're rather sweet, but the interchangeability issues can be a
    deal breaker if you're missing the key Raleigh-threaded bits.

    See: http://sheldonbrown.com/raleigh26 if you haven't already.

    Sheldon "Nottingham" Brown
    +---------------------------------------------------------+
    | It is good to learn from your mistakes; |
    | It is better to learn from the mistakes of others. |
    +---------------------------------------------------------+
    Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
    Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041
    http://harriscyclery.com
    Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide
    http://captainbike.com http://sheldonbrown.com

  3. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    How hard would it be to make an older Dunelt frame (it's just the
    frame and fork) into a fixie? I know their an English bike, and I've
    read everything about them at Sheldon

    _Everything_? ;-)

    hehehe. Well, I read all I could find searching for Dunelt. 🙂

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    - but is there anyhting I'll
    have to look out for when scrounging/buying parts?

    Unless it's a _very_ old Dunelt, it will be a Raleigh product, with the
    Raleigh proprietary threading. If you really have _only_ the frame and
    fork, it's not a pratical choice. If it has a headset and bottom
    bracket cups, it _might_ be a fair candidate.

    If my mind isn't playing tricks on me, I believe it did have the
    bottom bracket cups on it, but no axle or cranks. Is there anything I
    can look for to see if it's a Raleigh-era Dunelt? It has a Dunelt
    logo on the down tube, much like this one: (but obviously not as
    nice!) http://www.cyclart.com/DuneltTranspDT.jpg

    The badge on the front end is all a non-shiny silver and says
    "Dunelt".

    Quoted message said:

    There's nothing wrong with the performance or ride of these frames,
    indeed they're rather sweet, but the interchangeability issues can be a
    deal breaker if you're missing the key Raleigh-threaded bits.

    See: http://sheldonbrown.com/raleigh26 if you haven't already.

    Just did, thanks!

    I didn't think to look at the dropouts any closer than to confirm they
    were horizontal... would this bike fall in the roadster category you
    mention on that page? You also say to look at the diameter of the
    seatpost - I'll do that as well. Should I assume a non-Raleigh Dunelt
    would have use another diameter?

    Thanks Sheldon - you have no idea how many times I've found myself
    looking something up on your site, then spend the next hour or so
    bouncing around from link to link learning as I go! 🙂

    Also, have you heard of a bike called the GlobalMaster? I can't find
    anything on it anywhere on-line.

    Vincent

  4. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Unless it's a _very_ old Dunelt, it will be a Raleigh product, with the
    Raleigh proprietary threading. If you really have _only_ the frame and
    fork, it's not a pratical choice. If it has a headset and bottom
    bracket cups, it _might_ be a fair candidate.

    Ok, I went today to give it another look. The drivetrain side bottom
    bracket cup is there, although rusted. The other side is missing, but
    I tried 4 or 5 standard cups and they all screwed in with no problem.
    I would take this to mean that it's a non-raleigh era dunelt. I tried
    to pull the seatpost out to measure it, but it was stuck. I squirted
    some liquid wrench in there for when I go in tomorrow.

    Vincent

  5. Quoted message said:

    Ok, I went today to give it another look. The drivetrain side bottom
    bracket cup is there, although rusted. The other side is missing, but
    I tried 4 or 5 standard cups and they all screwed in with no problem.
    I would take this to mean that it's a non-raleigh era dunelt. I tried
    to pull the seatpost out to measure it, but it was stuck. I squirted
    some liquid wrench in there for when I go in tomorrow.

    Well, I left the drive side bracket in, and used a newer other side
    with a new lockring, worked out fine - although had to rule out a
    sealed bracket. *pout*

    Spent about 2 hours trying to clean the frame and fork. There's some
    surface rust where the grody brackets were to hold the chain guard and
    various other missing bits. Spent another hour trying different front
    wheels trying to get a match. I'll be damned but EVERY wheel I tried
    was too wide once I got the cones and lock nuts on. I think it was
    under 100mm when I measured it last thursday. One of the things I
    wanted to do when I went in today was write down as many measurements
    as I could, and of course I didn't do that. Doh!

    Same on the rear wheel. I want to say it was 110mm. Does this sound
    right? (actually, looking at Sheldon's site this appears to be
    perfect for a track/single speed hub. yay me!)

    I swear I tried using a freewheel hub with a single speed freewheel
    and it was still too narrow, but now I'm starting to doubt that I
    check that one after I put it on. I'll have to wait till Monday and
    check again. Do they make quick-release skewers to fit this narrow of
    a fork? The front is still vexing me.

    I'm getting really confused when I see information about track
    sprockets. I keep seeing that they'll fit on track hubs and standard
    freewheels, but when i see a "track hub" it looks like they have two
    levels of threading - one for the sprocket, one for the lockring.

    Now, I got a track sprocket (at least that's what he told me it was)
    and tried to put it on a few freewheels and it was way too big. Was
    this something else and not a track sprocket?

    Vincent "Sorry 'bout all the questions" Macaluso

  6. Vincent M said:

    ...Spent another hour trying different front
    wheels trying to get a match. I'll be damned but EVERY wheel I tried
    was too wide once I got the cones and lock nuts on. I think it was
    under 100mm when I measured it last thursday.

    Yes, if you had read my article at http://sheldonbrown.com/raleigh26 you
    would have known this.

    Quoted message said:

    Same on the rear wheel. I want to say it was 110mm. Does this sound
    right? (actually, looking at Sheldon's site this appears to be
    perfect for a track/single speed hub. yay me!)

    Yes, BMX hubs and some (mostly older) track hubs use 110 spacing.

    Quoted message said:

    I swear I tried using a freewheel hub with a single speed freewheel
    and it was still too narrow, but now I'm starting to doubt that I
    check that one after I put it on. I'll have to wait till Monday and
    check again. Do they make quick-release skewers to fit this narrow of
    a fork?

    No. My Moulton Stowaway fixed gear was like this. I used a Campagnolo
    120 mm freewheel type hub. The Moulton has very short chainstays,
    didn't want to bend them, and I wasn't eager to cut down the Campagnolo
    axle in any case. Instead, I left about 12 mm of axle sticking out on
    the right side, but slipped a 10 mm axle spacer on _outboard_ of the
    dropout! The acorn nut presses on the spacer, the spacer presses on the
    dropout, and it works fine. (I left the little conical springs off of
    the skewer.)

    The Moulton has a 53 tooth chainring, so the chain pull is not as severe
    as it would be with a smaller chainring, can't guarantee that you might
    not have axle slippage issues with smaller chainring.

    http://sheldonbrown.org/bicycle.html#stowaway

    Quoted message said:

    I'm getting really confused when I see information about track
    sprockets. I keep seeing that they'll fit on track hubs and standard
    freewheels, but when i see a "track hub" it looks like they have two
    levels of threading - one for the sprocket, one for the lockring.

    Right. The _sprocket_ thread is the same as standard freewheel thread.

    Quoted message said:

    Now, I got a track sprocket (at least that's what he told me it was)
    and tried to put it on a few freewheels and it was way too big. Was
    this something else and not a track sprocket?

    Very likely. Some older U.S. made coaster brakes used threaded
    sprockets with different (proprietary) threadings. These are often
    mistaken for track sprockets. I'm sure whoever sold it to you did so in
    good faith.

    Sheldon "53/12" Brown
    +-------------------------------------------------------------+
    | The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the |
    | unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world |
    | to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the |
    | unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw |
    +-------------------------------------------------------------+
    Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts
    Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041
    http://harriscyclery.com
    Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide
    http://captainbike.com http://sheldonbrown.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.