Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

OS Handlebars

Started by Jay Beattie · · Last activity · 5 posts · 830 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
9 April 2004
Last activity
10 April 2004
Original author
Jay Beattie
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
830
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Are the 31.8 handlebars a better idea? Any bar recommendations
    for a 200lb rider? I am starting my component purchase jihad for
    my new, replacement bicycle and am toying with going light.

    Lastly but not leastly, what is the convention for width. I have
    used 42s (mostly) and 44s for years, but have never selected a
    bar scientifically. I figure science may help me now that I am
    old and slower. -- Jay Beattie.

  2. Jay Beattie said:

    Are the 31.8 handlebars a better idea?

    No. Hypothetically, the thicker center section offers superior
    stiffness to a 25.4/26.0/26.4mm bar. But all the readily available
    drop bars in the fatter size are very lightweight and double grooved,
    so they'll flop around just as impotently as any other very
    lightweight, double grooved bar. What tiny amount of stiffness you
    may gain will not be worth the sacrifice in interchangeability and
    compatibility with clamp-on accessories.

    Quoted message said:

    Any bar recommendations for a 200lb rider?

    Something with a round cross section. All else equal, a round-tubed
    bar will offer better stiffness, strength, and durability than a
    grooved bar.

    Quoted message said:

    Lastly but not leastly, what is the convention for width. I have
    used 42s (mostly) and 44s for years, but have never selected a
    bar scientifically.

    There is no science to it; the drop bar itself is the result of a
    confluence of tradition, superstition, and misguided conventional
    wisdom. Use whatever width you like best, or use a proper handlebar
    like most of the world's bicyclists and all its motorcyclists.

    Chalo Colina

  3. Quoted message said:

    Are the 31.8 handlebars a better idea? Any bar recommendations
    for a 200lb rider? I am starting my component purchase jihad for
    my new, replacement bicycle and am toying with going light.

    31.8mm handlebars definitely improve stiffness, although that's not
    something too many people complain about in a road handlebar. However, when
    you test-ride identical bikes, one with a 31.8 and another with a 26.0 bar
    (as we had the opportunity to do this year, since some of our earliest '04
    models shipped with 26.0 bars until they had a supply of 31.8s), many will
    say the 31.8 is a big improvement. I notice some difference, but not in a
    way that would make the ride better or worse and, since a 31.8 bar typically
    has less clamping area for things like a handlebar bag, I'll probably stay
    with 26.0 until at least after my next trip to France (or until I find a
    better way to carry my bulkier, non-pocketable camera).

    But when you mention "going light", well, 31.8 has *not* delivered on the
    promise of lighter equipment. If anything, it's usually slightly-heavier.

    Quoted message said:

    Lastly but not leastly, what is the convention for width. I have
    used 42s (mostly) and 44s for years, but have never selected a
    bar scientifically. I figure science may help me now that I am
    old and slower. -- Jay Beattie.

    I usually size a bar 2cm wider than the shoulder blades; back-in-the-day,
    we'd go for straight shoulder width. I much prefer a wider bar, using 44cm
    for the past several years. When I raced (back in the mid-70s) I was
    running 38cm bars on my crit bike and 40cm on my road. When I try out a
    bike fitted with such narrow bars now, they feel just plain wrong! In
    general, once you go to a wider bar, I think you'll have a difficult time
    going back to something narrower. For me, climbing & breathing seem
    enhanced by the wider bar. I say "seem" enhanced, because I have no
    scientific proof (nor have read any) that there's any real benefit. But I
    figure if they feel better, why not?

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    http://www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

  4. jbeaghttie-<< Are the 31.8 handlebars a better idea? >><BR><BR>

    Nope, marketing driven.

    << Any bar recommendations
    for a 200lb rider? >><BR><BR>

    Ritchey Pro...WCS also(I use one and I am also .1 offa ton)

    As for width, use what ya think is comfy. Put three people inna room and ask
    about hbar width, get 4 opinions.

    Peter Chisholm
    Vecchio's Bicicletteria
    1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535
    http://www.vecchios.com
    "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  5. I used 40 to match my shoulders for a couple of years but when I lost that bike to a car ended up
    with 44 at the recommendation of some teammates. Never thought about the width until I was without
    a bike and rode my old single-speed with 40 bars for a few days. At first I thought they were
    silly narrow, but that faded in a couple of rides. Now I find them perfect, and have fitted my new
    bike with them. TEHO.

    "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In
    general, once you go to a wider bar, I think you'll have a difficult time
    going back to something narrower.

    Quoted message said:

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    http://www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.