UK and Europe · Public discussion

Electronic mapping

Started by Peter Amey · · Last activity · 15 posts · 550 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
7 June 2004
Last activity
14 June 2004
Original author
Peter Amey
Posts
15
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
550
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–15 of 15
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Inspired by this month's CTC Cycle mag I have had a brief look at
    electronic maps. The mag recommended Anquet (www.anquet.co.uk) but I
    couldn't get the demo 3-D imaging to work using any combinations of PCs
    and DirectX drivers that I have access to. I also found Memory Map
    (www.memory-map.co.uk) which does work, has a very nifty route profile
    feature but which seemed less good than Anquet for setting up bendy road
    routes.

    Anyone able to offer practical experience of using these or any other
    equivalent products?

    Peter

  2. [Copied direct to email as I'm not sure my news is going anywhere at
    present]

    Peter Amey said:

    Inspired by this month's CTC Cycle mag I have had a brief look at
    electronic maps. The mag recommended Anquet (www.anquet.co.uk) but I
    couldn't get the demo 3-D imaging to work using any combinations of PCs
    and DirectX drivers that I have access to. I also found Memory Map
    (www.memory-map.co.uk) which does work, has a very nifty route profile
    feature but which seemed less good than Anquet for setting up bendy road
    routes.

    Anyone able to offer practical experience of using these or any other
    equivalent products?

    Peter,

    I use Memory Map. I got a single region non-GPS map a good few years ago
    and earlier this year took advantage of an upgrade deal to get the whole
    of Central UK with GPS for a fairly low price.

    Memory Map now has two ways of generating routes, Tracks and Routes.
    Routes involve a series of way points connected together and they can be
    fiddly for wiggly routes. Tracks are essentially drawn freehand and with a
    steady hand quit complex routes can be drawn quickly. You can convert
    between the two. The 3D imaging works but is limited to a fairly small
    section of the route. It's fun but a bit gimmicky. The route profiles are
    excellent for cycling except I seem to have a glitch somewhere as Durham
    is at sea level and becomes abruptly so just outside Durham! I don't
    upload to a GPS but I have occasionally downloaded recorded routes to
    Memory map and I found it straightforward.

    I don't like MM's pricing, each CD has the program on it as well as the
    relevant data set so to add new regions you pay the full asking price
    rather than some sort of data upgrade price. They would argue that this is
    because of the OS licensing costs. Probably true to some extent but still
    not satisfactory.

    They are just starting to add 25:000 maps but only at National Park level,
    and they are proportionately more expensive though probably not so vital
    for cycling.

    Printouts are straightfoward. I tend to do a series to scale on A4 for
    longer routes. I do hide the tracks when printing though as they abscure
    map detail, which is a shame. A nice option would be for the tracks and
    routes to be printed as transparent highlighter colours---not sure if
    other packages do this.

    I have no experience with Anquet.

    Which ever you go for buy as much map as you can afford unless you only
    need a small area.

    Cheers,

    Colin

  3. Anquet is good but tracklogs is better www.tracklogs.co.uk Andy, the
    developer and his wife run it as a family business are very approachable and
    Andy is a really nice guy and a top cyclist - doing transalp this year.

    I have both as full versions, the 3D mapping is great to play with, routes
    in the lakes / peaks etc never looked so intimidating :-)

    Memory map seemed more expensive and less features when I looked a few years
    ago

    Russ

    "Peter Amey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Inspired by this month's CTC Cycle mag I have had a brief look at
    electronic maps. The mag recommended Anquet (www.anquet.co.uk) but I
    couldn't get the demo 3-D imaging to work using any combinations of PCs
    and DirectX drivers that I have access to. I also found Memory Map
    (www.memory-map.co.uk) which does work, has a very nifty route profile
    feature but which seemed less good than Anquet for setting up bendy road
    routes.

    Anyone able to offer practical experience of using these or any other
    equivalent products?

    Peter

  4. "Colin Blackburn" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    [Copied direct to email as I'm not sure my news is going anywhere at
    present]

    Peter Amey said:

    Inspired by this month's CTC Cycle mag I have had a brief look at
    electronic maps. The mag recommended Anquet (www.anquet.co.uk) but I
    couldn't get the demo 3-D imaging to work using any combinations of PCs
    and DirectX drivers that I have access to. I also found Memory Map
    (www.memory-map.co.uk) which does work, has a very nifty route profile
    feature but which seemed less good than Anquet for setting up bendy road
    routes.

    Anyone able to offer practical experience of using these or any other
    equivalent products?

    Peter,

    I use Memory Map. I got a single region non-GPS map a good few years ago
    and earlier this year took advantage of an upgrade deal to get the whole
    of Central UK with GPS for a fairly low price.

    Memory Map now has two ways of generating routes, Tracks and Routes.
    Routes involve a series of way points connected together and they can be
    fiddly for wiggly routes. Tracks are essentially drawn freehand and with a
    steady hand quit complex routes can be drawn quickly. You can convert
    between the two. The 3D imaging works but is limited to a fairly small
    section of the route. It's fun but a bit gimmicky. The route profiles are
    excellent for cycling except I seem to have a glitch somewhere as Durham
    is at sea level and becomes abruptly so just outside Durham! I don't
    upload to a GPS but I have occasionally downloaded recorded routes to
    Memory map and I found it straightforward.

    I don't like MM's pricing, each CD has the program on it as well as the
    relevant data set so to add new regions you pay the full asking price
    rather than some sort of data upgrade price. They would argue that this is
    because of the OS licensing costs. Probably true to some extent but still
    not satisfactory.

    They are just starting to add 25:000 maps but only at National Park level,
    and they are proportionately more expensive though probably not so vital
    for cycling.

    Printouts are straightfoward. I tend to do a series to scale on A4 for
    longer routes. I do hide the tracks when printing though as they abscure
    map detail, which is a shame. A nice option would be for the tracks and
    routes to be printed as transparent highlighter colours---not sure if
    other packages do this.

    Anquet doesn't, Tracklogs does

    Quoted message said:

    Which ever you go for buy as much map as you can afford unless you only
    need a small area.

    Agreed
    Russ

  5. Russ said:

    Anquet is good but tracklogs is better www.tracklogs.co.uk Andy, the
    developer and his wife run it as a family business are very approachable and
    Andy is a really nice guy and a top cyclist - doing transalp this year.

    I have both as full versions, the 3D mapping is great to play with, routes
    in the lakes / peaks etc never looked so intimidating :-)

    Memory map seemed more expensive and less features when I looked a few years
    ago

    Russ

    Thanks for the tip. I have just tried the Tracklogs demo and I think it
    might be the best of the 3 I have looked at so far.

    Peter

  6. Colin Blackburn said:


    I use Memory Map. I got a single region non-GPS map a good few years ago
    and earlier this year took advantage of an upgrade deal to get the whole
    of Central UK with GPS for a fairly low price.

    I bought some of the early Memory Maps where you had to manually link all the
    tiles together. A year later they bought out an upgraded version with height
    profiles and auto tiling etc. I wrote to customer support to ask if there
    were any upgrade deals for existing customers. They didn't even bother to
    reply.

    Tony

  7. On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 18:01:58 +0100, Tony Raven <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I bought some of the early Memory Maps where you had to manually link
    all the
    tiles together. A year later they bought out an upgraded version with
    height
    profiles and auto tiling etc. I wrote to customer support to ask if
    there
    were any upgrade deals for existing customers. They didn't even bother
    to
    reply.

    Same here. Terrible customer service. However I noticed, by chance, an
    upgrade offer on their website. It was past the closure date for the offer
    but the online ordering system accepted my details and charged me the
    right (discounted) price. If it hadn't have been for that chance I'd have
    probably looked elsewhere.

    Colin

  8. Peter Amey said:

    Inspired by this month's CTC Cycle mag I have had a brief look at
    electronic maps. The mag recommended Anquet (www.anquet.co.uk) but I
    couldn't get the demo 3-D imaging to work using any combinations of
    PCs and DirectX drivers that I have access to. I also found Memory
    Map (www.memory-map.co.uk) which does work, has a very nifty route
    profile feature but which seemed less good than Anquet for setting up
    bendy road routes.

    Anyone able to offer practical experience of using these or any other
    equivalent products?

    I have no experience of this stuff but I've been thinking about buying
    a gps gizmo recently and have also been looking at mapping software.

    Nobody has yet (as far as I've noticed) mention fugawi
    (www.fugawi.com). I don't know how it compares with these others, but
    it's something else to consider.

  9. Paul Rudin wrote:
    [snip]

    Quoted message said:


    Nobody has yet (as far as I've noticed) mention fugawi
    (www.fugawi.com). I don't know how it compares with these others, but
    it's something else to consider.

    I am afraid to say I immediately read this company name in the sense of
    "where the fugawi?" and a tea spillage moment as a result :-)

    Peter

  10. Paul Rudin said:

    Nobody has yet (as far as I've noticed) mention fugawi
    (www.fugawi.com). I don't know how it compares with these others, but
    it's something else to consider.

    I have had Fugawi for a few months now; after a spot of research I chose
    this one because it came with the most map for the money. IIRC Anquet
    came with smaller regions and TrackLogs came with little more than
    individual counties; I would have needed about four of them to cover
    just local rides around here, whereas with Fugawi £45 gets you the
    entire width of Britain up to just north of Worcester, which I think is
    excellent.

    The only major downside I've run into is that the route editing features
    are rubbish; to add a new point you have to export the route to a text
    file, copy some points in a text editor, re-import the file and move the
    new points to where you want them.

    It doesn't have a 3D mode, although from what I saw of the Anquet one it
    was little more than a cheap gimmick anyway, it looked very much an
    afterthought. It does have elevation data and route profiles, which is
    useful. A cumulative distance field on routes and tracks would have been
    useful too, but that's a pretty minor thing.

    I haven't tried TrackLogs; the lack of a demo version and small maps
    made me ignore it pretty quickly. I would like to see what TrackLogs is
    like, but right now if I had to choose one over again I think I'd still
    go with Fugawi.

    Phil
    --
    "Cattle Prods solve most of life's little problems."

  11. "Paul Rudin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Peter Amey said:

    Inspired by this month's CTC Cycle mag I have had a brief look at
    electronic maps. The mag recommended Anquet (www.anquet.co.uk) but I
    couldn't get the demo 3-D imaging to work using any combinations of
    PCs and DirectX drivers that I have access to. I also found Memory
    Map (www.memory-map.co.uk) which does work, has a very nifty route
    profile feature but which seemed less good than Anquet for setting up
    bendy road routes.

    Anyone able to offer practical experience of using these or any other
    equivalent products?

    I have no experience of this stuff but I've been thinking about buying
    a gps gizmo recently and have also been looking at mapping software.

    Nobody has yet (as far as I've noticed) mention fugawi
    (www.fugawi.com). I don't know how it compares with these others, but
    it's something else to consider.

    It's been around a lot longer than the others and was something I looked at
    (but discounted) 5 or 6 years ago when I first got into GPS stuff. Was a
    decent enough program then but doesn't appear to have even height data for
    OS maps let alone 3D mapping. I'd go for one of the UK based products with
    the added functionality if it was me.

    Russ

  12. Phil Himsworth said:
    Paul Rudin said:

    Nobody has yet (as far as I've noticed) mention fugawi

    Quoted message said:

    I haven't tried TrackLogs; the lack of a demo version and small maps
    made me ignore it pretty quickly. I would like to see what TrackLogs is
    like, but right now if I had to choose one over again I think I'd still
    go with Fugawi.

    Phil


    Tracklogs do a free fully working demo disk on request, see
    http://www.tracklogs.co.uk/cgi-bin/publ/user.cgi?obj=home&page=softup&id=2000

  13. In message <[email hidden]>, Peter Amey
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    Inspired by this month's CTC Cycle mag I have had a brief look at
    electronic maps. The mag recommended Anquet (www.anquet.co.uk) but I
    couldn't get the demo 3-D imaging to work using any combinations of PCs
    and DirectX drivers that I have access to. I also found Memory Map
    (www.memory-map.co.uk) which does work, has a very nifty route profile
    feature but which seemed less good than Anquet for setting up bendy
    road routes.

    Anyone able to offer practical experience of using these or any other
    equivalent products?

    MM is much better than Anquet for route planning - especially for the
    bendy bits! It is also much easier [unless there have been any very
    recent upgrades to change it] to edit routes in MM. Route profiles are
    better in MM.

    3D mapping is better in Anquet though.

    HTH
    --
    Philip Powell
    Looking north across the Derwent Valley and Northumberland
    to The Cheviot

  14. Paul Rudin said:

    =

    Quoted message said:

    Peter Amey <[email hidden]> writes:

    Quoted message said:

    I have no experience of this stuff but I've been thinking about buying
    a gps gizmo recently and have also been looking at mapping software.
    =

    Quoted message said:

    Nobody has yet (as far as I've noticed) mention fugawi
    (www.fugawi.com). I don't know how it compares with these others, but
    it's something else to consider.

    I bought Fugawi from Dream Direct earlier this year. They were selling th=
    e
    product at =A335 each for the four GB CDs. Having the whole 1:50000
    landranger series electronically for =A3150 was too tempting to ignore.

    To answer Phil Himsaorth's comment

    Quoted message said:

    The only major downside I've run into is that the route editing feature=


    s =

    Quoted message said:

    are rubbish; to add a new point you have to export the route to a text =

    Quoted message said:

    file, copy some points in a text editor, re-import the file and move th=


    e =

    Quoted message said:

    new points to where you want them.


    You can also add points to a route by opening up a new route in the Route=

    tool, and copying and pasting blocks of points from the original route, a=
    nd
    the additional points.
    This is still fiddly, but I don't need to export to text and use a separa=
    te
    editor.

    Russ said:

    It's been around a lot longer than the others and was something I looke=


    d at

    Quoted message said:

    (but discounted) 5 or 6 years ago when I first got into GPS stuff. Was =


    a

    Quoted message said:

    decent enough program then but doesn't appear to have even height data =


    for

    Quoted message said:

    OS maps let alone 3D mapping. I'd go for one of the UK based products w=


    ith

    Quoted message said:

    the added functionality if it was me.

    The elevation data is present on the CDs, but needs to be installed
    separately from the product. It shows elevation profiles, but no 3D.

    I think I have found a bug with the elevation profile display. In track
    view mode, if you display the elevation profile and switch repeatedly
    between feet and metres it converts from feet to metres, but not back
    again. After switching a few times I managed to get the summit of Goat Fe=
    ll
    on Arran up to 10000 feet, thus making my day's walk look more impressive=
    !

    I like the ability to construct my day's route as a track, rather than
    route as my GPS (basic Garmin eTrex) can store several tracks, but only o=
    ne
    route.

    I haven't made much use of the printing facility, so I can't comment on
    that. I mainly work between Fugawi and the GPS.

  15. Mike K Smith said:


    I haven't made much use of the printing facility, so I can't comment on
    that. I mainly work between Fugawi and the GPS.

    I use Fugawi too, and the printing is limited to printing what you can
    fit on a single page (no tiling or anything to spread over multiple
    pages). I think that restriction is placed on Fugawi by the Ord Survey
    as part of the map license.

    I've put a few Reading area routes on http://www.looseend.org/?cat=2 .
    I've made more, but not uploaded them.

    John

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.