The engineers at Easton told me the EC90 carbon fork is not to exceed 80mm of spacer length. I thought that was an unusually high number, but they assured me that it was safe to use up to that point. Has anyone used this fork with a spacer height of more than 1" without any issues? I'm using the 1" steerer.
The engineers at Easton told me the EC90 carbon fork is not to exceed 80mm of spacer length. I thought that was an unusually high number, but they assured me that it was safe to use up to that point. Has anyone used this fork with a spacer height of more than 1" without any issues? I'm using the 1" steerer.
Thanks, John
can anyone explain why spacer height is such an issue, and stemlenght or handlebar width can be ignored? -- Marten
can anyone explain why spacer height is such an issue, and stemlenght or handlebar width can be ignored? -- Marten
Good question!!! Basically, it can't. You might want to ask a fork manufacturer that same question and post their answer here.
Personally, I use elementary geometry to determine if the total leverage exceeds what would be the case for the manufacturer's stated max height with a 120mm stem and work back from there.
"M-Gineering import & framebouw" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
can anyone explain why spacer height is such an issue, and stemlenght or handlebar width can be ignored? -- Marten
I suspect the steerer is designed to work with a certain length. A stem may be designed to accept a certain load and may be over-engineered to sustain all foreseeable, normal forces that a rider can produce with the widest bars conceivable. However, with the carbon steerer, they may not have the latitude in dimensions to over-build the part to accept all possible loads. The further the steerer gets out of the upper bearing area, the more cantilevered it is, making it weaker and weaker. The fork designer probably did his math, came up with a number that worked and slapped a label on there relieving them of some liability issues (but not all, conceivably). If they went through the trouble of putting a label on there it's probably worth thinking long and hard about overriding that advice.
mcgyyver-<< The engineers at Easton told me the EC90 carbon fork is not to exceed 80mm of spacer length. I thought that was an unusually high number, but they assured me that it was safe to use up to that point. Has anyone used this fork with a spacer height of more than 1" without any
We use 1.5 inches(4cm) on 1 1/8inch steerers and 1 inch(2.5cm) for 1 inch steerers..
I wouldn't use 8cm(3 inches) on any carbon steerer fork, particularly on a 1 inch carbon steerer.
Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302 (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.comOpen ↗ "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"