I know this has been discussed before, but in reading past threads, I did not see an explanation of
the difference. I know the razor used to be listed as 400 grams, but velocity now lists them as 450
and the aerohead as 400. Did they increase the weight of the razor to make them stronger? Other than
looks, is there a reason one should prefer one of these over the other? The new off center rear
aerohead should be a preference for some.
Cycling Equipment · Public discussion
aerohead vs razor
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Cycling Equipment
- Published
- 12 April 2003
- Last activity
- 14 April 2003
- Original author
- Belij3
- Posts
- 6
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 673
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
belij-<< I know this has been discussed before, but in reading past threads, I did not see an
explanation of the difference.Aerohead is a delta shaped design, no eyelets, Razor is a more boxy shape, single eyelets. Razor is
the heavier of the two. As you mentioned, the aerohead has an offcenter rear, the razor does not. If
coupled with the proper spoke number and gauge and a good build, both make for great wheelsets.Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
(303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.comOpen ↗ "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene" -
Belij3 said:
I know this has been discussed before, but in reading past threads, I did not see an explanation
of the difference. I know the razor used to be listed as 400 grams, but velocity now lists them as
450 and the aerohead as 400. Did they increase the weight of the razor to make them stronger?
Other than looks, is there a reason one should prefer one of these over the other? The new off
center rear aerohead should be a preference for some.Peter Chisholm replied:
Quoted message said:
Aerohead is a delta shaped design, no eyelets, Razor is a more boxy shape, single eyelets. Razor
is the heavier of the two. As you mentioned, the aerohead has an offcenter rear, the razor does
not. If coupled with the proper spoke number and gauge and a good build, both make for great
wheelsets.What about the original question: Was the Razor redesigned at a heavier weight? Given that caveat
that sample weights can have a larger variation, I weighed some Velocity rims about a year ago, and
my two samples of Razor rims (403g,
413g) were lighter than my one sample of an Aerohead rim
(413h). Is the Razor now heavier than it once was?Mark McMaster [email hidden]
-
Mark-<< Is the Razor now heavier than it once was?
Don't know, don't have any in the shop-
Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302
(303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.comOpen ↗ "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene" -
"Belij3" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
I know this has been discussed before, but in reading past threads, I did
notQuoted message said:
see an explanation of the difference. I know the razor used to be listed
as 400Quoted message said:
grams, but velocity now lists them as 450 and the aerohead as 400. Did
theyQuoted message said:
increase the weight of the razor to make them stronger? Other than looks,
isQuoted message said:
there a reason one should prefer one of these over the other? The new off center rear aerohead
should be a preference for some.Razor has eyelets. yellowjersey.orgvelocity.htmlOpen ↗
--
Andrew Muzi yellowjersey.orgyellowjersey.orgOpen ↗ Open every day since 1 April 1971 -
Quoted message said:
Razor has eyelets.
Didn"t they have eyelets when they were listed as 400gms? B
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.