folding bike

anonymous writes anonymously:

Quoted message said:

I'm considering buying a folding bike. So far I saw a 3-speed $400 Brompton and a 5 or 6-speed
$299 Dahon. I can handle both, as far as the weight is concerned (although I was told that
Brompton is lighter).

Those are probably the best choices. See how much space you will have on the public transport you
plan to use and see if the folded size will fit under the seat or in luggage space offered before
deciding. Light weight is not as important as durability, ease of assembly, and compact size.

Jobst Brandt [email hidden] Palo Alto CA

newsshy said:

I am new here -- please do not peck (too hard). I'm considering buying a folding bike. So far I
saw a 3-speed $400 Brompton and a 5 or 6-speed $299 Dahon. I can handle both, as far as the weight
is concerned (although I was told that Brompton is lighter). What group's consensus would be? Are
there any other brands/models to be considered as an inexpensive first? I plan to fold the bike
for subway and bus transportation and I think (now) that slight difference in weight should not
matter much -- I am not going to carry them for miles. Any suggestions from
grandmasters/professionals are greatly appreciated.

1) Look up the folding society web site. <http://www.foldsoc.co.uk/> 2) The Brompton's very highly
regarded as a fast-folder.

newsshy said:

I'm considering buying a folding bike. So far I saw a 3-speed $400 Brompton and a 5 or 6-speed $299
Dahon. I can handle both, as far as the weight is concerned (although I was told that Brompton is
lighter).

Never seen the Dahon, but there's a lot of Bromptons round here. You can fold one in about 15-20
seconds; there may be applications for which that is so overwhelming an advantage that nothing else
matters much.
--
David Damerell <[email hidden]> flcl?

Jobst, you addressed three issues: ease of assembly is important; as I understand, you mean smoothly
working joints without small removable parts (I mean small nuts and bolts that always get misplaced
:-). As far as compact size: I saw that guy in NYC subway car, his Brompton (probably 20"😉 did not
get on anyone nerves. Mine could be a few inches larger...I don't own a car, so superminiaturization
is not crucial. What do you mean by durability? If my bike will last three years without major
problems, the beer is on me. regards, Newsshy <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

anonymous writes anonymously:

Quoted message said:

I'm considering buying a folding bike. So far I saw a 3-speed $400 Brompton and a 5 or 6-speed
$299 Dahon. I can handle both, as far as the weight is concerned (although I was told that
Brompton is lighter).

Those are probably the best choices. See how much space you will have on the public transport you
plan to use and see if the folded size will fit under the seat or in luggage space offered before
deciding. Light weight is not as important as durability, ease of assembly, and compact size.

Jobst Brandt [email hidden] Palo Alto CA

"newsshy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

I am new here -- please do not peck (too hard). I'm considering buying a folding bike. So far I
saw a 3-speed $400 Brompton and a 5 or 6-speed $299 Dahon.

Bromptons are more consistent in design than Dahons, meaning that while most Bromptons are quite
good, some Dahons are not. Depends on which Dahon. I own a Brompton, have ridden a Dahon Boardwalk
6, and have read a good deal about how horrible some (older) Dahons are. The Brompton folds faster
and smaller than any Dahon, and is lighter than all but one. These things are very important
considering the application, but I have to admit that the Dahon Boardwalk 6 had a much sweeter ride
than I expected. I could even ride it no hands, something I can't pull off for long on the Brommie.
But $400 for a Brompton is a very good price.

<snip> "newsshy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

I'm considering buying a folding bike. ....> .... Any suggestions from grandmasters/professionals
are greatly appreciated.
-----------------------------

Steven Scharf's thoughtful web page on folders is: nordicgroup.usfoldOpen ↗

His page on coffee and bicycling is terrific too.

Regards, Larry "Riding a Raleigh Twenty" Fieman

"newsshy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

I am new here -- please do not peck (too hard). I'm considering buying a folding bike. So far I
saw a 3-speed $400 Brompton and a 5 or 6-speed $299 Dahon. I can handle both, as far as the weight
is concerned (although I was told that Brompton is lighter). What group's consensus would be? Are
there any other brands/models to be considered as an inexpensive first? I plan to fold the bike
for subway and bus transportation and I think (now) that slight difference in weight should not
matter much -- I am not going to carry them for miles. Any suggestions from
grandmasters/professionals are greatly appreciated.
-----------------------------
Newsshy

I am a great fan of Bromptons. The fold very small and very quickly (about 15 seconds to
fold/unfold), are robust, ride well and have good, if expensive, luggage and other options (e.g.
extending seatpost, folding pedals etc). I have had one (3-speed) for 5 years or so which has worked
very well (acquired second hand for £60). There IS more resistance in the drive train due to the
chain tensioner, but the ease of folding and compactness cannot be beaten. Every detail is
engineered to work. Folds easily small enough to be carried as luggage on bus/train.

It is a while since I bought this and other bikes have probably come on a lot since then, but of the
four or five folders I tried this was the only one that was actually a pleasure to ride - the others
ranged from uncomfortable to alarming.

If you opt for a Brompton you won't be disappointed.