treks

kjkerr said:

Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the expesive
bikes?

Kerry
kjkerr at cvty.com

No they are not suitable. You need even cheaper bikes in order to mountain
bike. Check out the Huffy's at Walmart. Only $99 bikes are mountain bikes.

On 2004-06-29, kjkerr penned:

Quoted message said:

Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the expesive
bikes?

Is $4800 expensive enough for you? If so, you could look at a Trek Fuel
100.

Treks come in a variety of prices, from really cheap to really
expensive. What *model* of Trek were you looking at?

--
monique

"kjkerr" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the expesive bikes?

I hope you're wearing your flame retardent suit...

- CA-G

Can-Am Girls Kick Ass!

kjkerr said:

Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the expesive
bikes?

Kerry
kjkerr at cvty.com

Yes and no, depending on what Trek and what "expensive" bike it's being
compared to.

Matt

kjkerr said:

Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the expesive bikes?

<sarcasm>No, they've just managed to be one of the top-selling mountain
bike brands just because of their cool name.</sarcasm>

That question is so open-ended and flame-prone that its hard to tell if
you're even serious in asking it.

--
-BB-
To reply to me, drop the attitude (from my e-mail address, at least)

kjkerr said:

Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the expesive
bikes?

Did you see last year's Tour?

Bill "meaning unsure" S.

kjkerr said:

Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the expesive
bikes?

Kerry
kjkerr at cvty.com

Drum roll for JD! 🙂

--
- Zilla
Cary, NC
(Remove XSPAM)

kjkerr said:

Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the expesive bikes?

Kerry
kjkerr at cvty.com

Seems like the Trek Fuel 100 I just read a review of was about $4900 and
yes, Treks great. Even cheaper ones, like mine.

Shawn Curry said:

Carla A-G said:

"kjkerr" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the expesive
bikes?

I hope you're wearing your flame retardent suit...

Damn, I hate dyslexia. I first read that as "I hope you're wearing
your flame suit [censored]." ;-)

Shawn

I think the message is the same either way.

"Shawn Curry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Damn, I hate dyslexia. I first read that as "I hope you're wearing your
flame suit [censored]." ;-)

I usually don't insult people unless I know them well enough :-)

- CA-G

Can-Am Girls Kick Ass!

jem <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

kjkerr said:

Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the expesive bikes?

Kerry
kjkerr at cvty.com

Seems like the Trek Fuel 100 I just read a review of was about $4900 and
yes, Treks great. Even cheaper ones, like mine.

This is funny. The bottom line is that it all starts at the frame.
You could put XTR on a walgoose and it would still be a walgoose,
albeit a $4900 walgoose. There's one born every minute...

JD

JD said:

jem <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

kjkerr said:

Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the expesive
bikes?

Kerry
kjkerr at cvty.com

Seems like the Trek Fuel 100 I just read a review of was about $4900
and yes, Treks great. Even cheaper ones, like mine.

This is funny. The bottom line is that it all starts at the frame.
You could put XTR on a walgoose and it would still be a walgoose,
albeit a $4900 walgoose. There's one born every minute...

JD

<cymbalcrash.wav>

--
- Zilla
Cary, NC
(Remove XSPAM)

Zilla says:

Quoted message said:

<cymbalcrash.wav>

About frikkin time! I was getting bored listening to the drumroll... ;-)

Steve