You know, I actually originally thought that Mike Vandeman was trying to
change our minds about mountain biking. I just caught on that he is
just trying to make people mad. I don't think I would try to convince
someone of something by acting the way he does.
Mountain Bikes · Public discussion
Wrong On Vandeman
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Mountain Bikes
- Published
- 18 June 2004
- Last activity
- 21 June 2004
- Original author
- Muskie
- Posts
- 20
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 591
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
"Muskie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
You know, I actually originally thought that Mike Vandeman was trying to
change our minds about mountain biking. I just caught on that he is
just trying to make people mad. I don't think I would try to convince
someone of something by acting the way he does.Many years ago I used to argue with him on rbor, he hasn't changed a bit.
Nowadays I just killfile these kinds of nimrods.The key thing is that he in no way represents any environmental movement,
interest or sentiment.
He only represents himself.MTBing does no significant harm to the environment, in fact it benefits the
environment and all who participate in it. Do we need to be sensitive about
trail usage and good environmental stewardship? Yes. Do we need to be
neurotic about it? No.Sniffinvinyl
----------------
Remain sane, cycle your brains out . . . -
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:47:27 -0400, Muskie <[email hidden]> wrote:
..You know, I actually originally thought that Mike Vandeman was trying to
.. change our minds about mountain biking. I just caught on that he is
..just trying to make people mad. I don't think I would try to convince
..someone of something by acting the way he does.You forgot that mountain bikers don't listen to anyone criticising mountain
biking. DUH!
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) -
Mike Vandeman said:
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:47:27 -0400, Muskie <[email hidden]>
wrote:.You know, I actually originally thought that Mike Vandeman was
trying to . change our minds about mountain biking. I just caught on
that he is .just trying to make people mad. I don't think I would try
to convince .someone of something by acting the way he does.You forgot that mountain bikers don't listen to anyone criticising
mountain biking. DUH!
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)Did somebody say sumfin'?
-
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Did somebody say sumfin'?
Sorry, it was me, I farted. -
FRed FRagger says:
Quoted message said:
Sorry, it was me, I farted.
I knew it had to be you....
-
"SniffinVinyl" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Muskie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
You know, I actually originally thought that Mike Vandeman was trying to
change our minds about mountain biking. I just caught on that he is
just trying to make people mad. I don't think I would try to convince
someone of something by acting the way he does.Many years ago I used to argue with him on rbor, he hasn't changed a bit.
Nowadays I just killfile these kinds of nimrods.The key thing is that he in no way represents any environmental movement,
interest or sentiment.
He only represents himself.MTBing does no significant harm to the environment, in fact it benefits the
environment and all who participate in it. Do we need to be sensitive about
trail usage and good environmental stewardship? Yes. Do we need to be
neurotic about it? No.Sniffinvinyl
----------------
Remain sane, cycle your brains out . . .You're correct, on all counts...
--
Cameron -
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 20:38:44 GMT, Mike Vandeman <[email hidden]>
scribbled:Quoted message said:
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:47:27 -0400, Muskie <[email hidden]> wrote:
.You know, I actually originally thought that Mike Vandeman was trying to
. change our minds about mountain biking. I just caught on that he is
.just trying to make people mad. I don't think I would try to convince
.someone of something by acting the way he does.You forgot that mountain bikers don't listen to anyone criticising mountain
biking. DUH!But then what would be the point of continuing to post?
<bends mind>
-Slash
--
"Ebert Victorious"
-The Onion -
!
Quoted message said:
But then what would be the point of continuing to post?Because he has such a sad life, he has nothing else to do.
-
Fred Fragger said...
Quoted message said:
Sorry, it was me, I farted.
Your ass, Vandeman's face, what's the difference? They both have a hole
that spews kaka. -
"SuperSlinky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Fred Fragger said...
Quoted message said:
Sorry, it was me, I farted.
Your ass, Vandeman's face, what's the difference? They both have a hole
that spews kaka.I don't care who yar... that thar's funny.
-
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 23:20:08 -0800, Slash <[email hidden]> wrote:
..On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 20:38:44 GMT, Mike Vandeman <[email hidden]>
..scribbled:
..
..>On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:47:27 -0400, Muskie <[email hidden]> wrote:
..>
..>.You know, I actually originally thought that Mike Vandeman was trying to
..>. change our minds about mountain biking. I just caught on that he is
..>.just trying to make people mad. I don't think I would try to convince
..>.someone of something by acting the way he does.
..>
..>You forgot that mountain bikers don't listen to anyone criticising mountain
..>biking. DUH!
..
..But then what would be the point of continuing to post?Because you aren't the only one who read this. DUH!
..<bends mind>
..
..-Slash===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) -
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 05:50:55 -0500, "di" <[email hidden]> wrote:
..
..!
..>
..> But then what would be the point of continuing to post?
..
..Because he has such a sad life, he has nothing else to do.More like shooting fish in a barrel. 🙂 You guys are so easy!
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) -
Quoted message said:
More like shooting fish in a barrel. 🙂 You guys are so easy!
Mike, you feckin' evil [censored]!
-
"
Quoted message said:
More like shooting fish in a barrel. 🙂 You guys are so easy!
===Whoa, "shooting fish", this contradicts your opinions of not harming any
kind of wildlife. You are slipping a little aren't you? DUH!! -
Mike Vandeman <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 05:50:55 -0500, "di" <[email hidden]> wrote:
.
.!
.>
.> But then what would be the point of continuing to post?
.
.Because he has such a sad life, he has nothing else to do.More like shooting fish in a barrel. 🙂 You guys are so easy!
Easy like Mrs. Vandeman or some other easy?
-
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:55:28 +0100, "Tetsuo Shima" <[email hidden]>
wrote:..> More like shooting fish in a barrel. 🙂 You guys are so easy!
..
..Mike, you feckin' evil [censored]!See what I mean? All I have to do is open my mouth, and you guys show your true
colors, inducing normal humans to retch.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) -
"Marty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"SuperSlinky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Fred Fragger said...
Quoted message said:
Sorry, it was me, I farted.
Your ass, Vandeman's face, what's the difference? They both have a hole
that spews kaka.I don't care who yar... that thar's funny.
Hehe, go Larry. Err, Marty. Sorry. ;-)
--
Cameron -
Mike Vandeman <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:55:28 +0100, "Tetsuo Shima" <[email hidden]>
wrote:.> More like shooting fish in a barrel. 🙂 You guys are so easy!
.
.Mike, you feckin' evil [censored]!See what I mean? All I have to do is open my mouth, and you guys show your true
colors, inducing normal humans to retch.
===Notice he didn't deny the Mrs. was easy. She had to have been to
hook up with the kook. -
R.White said:
Mike Vandeman <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...Quoted message said:
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:55:28 +0100, "Tetsuo Shima"
<[email hidden]> wrote:.> More like shooting fish in a barrel. 🙂 You guys are so easy!
.
.Mike, you feckin' evil [censored]!See what I mean? All I have to do is open my mouth, and you guys
show your true colors, inducing normal humans to retch.
===Notice he didn't deny the Mrs. was easy. She had to have been to
hook up with the kook.The very fact that he assumes that *anyone* on usenet can be described as
'normal' proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that he's not the sharpest tool
in the shed. A tool yes, but not the sharpest one.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.