bicyle dynamos etc...

net said:

I'm interested to know what is the latest in dynamos/electric power generators for bicycles. I
dont mean the subject of mains power replacement, I mean to power bicycle lights or recharge
batteries while on the move. I've searched around a bit using google and viewed a few online cycle
shops but can find little info on this. I've got a bicycle headlight that doubles as a battery
charger for the 4xAA's inside it but naturally it needs a 6v DC supply to do the re-charging. Has
a dynamo been developed yet that supplies a constant 6V? I'm also surprised not to find a solar
panel model anywhere. There are solar powered calculators so surely one could also use the same
priciple to make a trickle charger. The possibilities are numerous. Even a small fan mounted
mounted on the handlebar could drive a little dynamo that could trickle charge. I wish I was
brainier with electronics...

The extra weight and resistance added make it far from worth it - thats why expensive bike lights
have seperate, long life rechargable batteries that recharge OFF the bike.

Solar panels wouldn't work too well, unless you plan on running those lights during the day, or
leaving your bike with solar panels out sunning all day long and then power your LED light for a
few hours 😉

Jon Bond

net said:

I'm interested to know what is the latest in dynamos/electric power generators for bicycles. I
dont mean the subject of mains power replacement, I mean to power bicycle lights or recharge
batteries while on the move. I've searched around a bit using google and viewed a few online cycle
shops but can find little info on this.

See myra-simon.comdynotest.htmlOpen ↗

Also see sheldonbrown.comdynohubs.htmlOpen ↗

Quoted message said:

I've got a bicycle headlight that doubles as a battery charger for the 4xAA's inside it but
naturally it needs a 6v DC supply to do the re-charging. Has a dynamo been developed yet that
supplies a constant 6V?

As close as you need, yes. But understand, bike dyanamos are AC devices. You'd need recification, as
mentioned in the second article above. That entails some losses in efficiency.

Quoted message said:

I'm also surprised not to find a solar panel model anywhere. There are solar powered calculators
so surely one could also use the same priciple to make a trickle charger.

I was looking at solar yard lights the other day. A three-inch-square solar cell will charge two AA
rechargeable batteries and run one dim LED for perhaps 8 hours. Based on that, I assume it will run
two dim LEDs for about four hours, or four dim LEDs for two hours. Those dim LEDs won't light the
road very well at all.

What it comes down to is, solar isn't going to be worth the money. You could, of course, go with a
more efficient solar panel (crystalline vs. amorphous), you could go with a bigger solar panel and
bigger batteries, but to get enough solar electricity to run an adequate bike light (or anything
else), solar will be too costly and cumbersome.

Part of the problem is the energy losses involved in battery charging. I haven't been able to find
the efficiency (and haven't troubled to measure it yet) but you definitely get less out of a battery
than what you put in.

Quoted message said:

The possibilities are numerous. Even a small fan mounted mounted on the handlebar could drive a
little dynamo that could trickle charge.

Keep in mind that YOU make the energy that spins the dynamo (unless your bike is parked in a breezy
area). This is true whether it's driven by the relative wind you create, or by the spinning of your
tire against a roller, or by the rotation of your hub directly driving the rotor in the dynamo.

What matters, then, is how much energy is lost in the transfer. A propellor drive would be much less
efficient than a roller on your tire, I think. The most efficient method is to have a direct drive
mechanism without gears, like the Schmidt (or SON) dynamo mentioned in that first article.

Also, to keep efficiency up, you'd NOT want to lose any power in storage. That means you generate
the power as you need it, and feed it directly into a well-matched load. I don't think you're going
to do better than the Schmidt.

Quoted message said:

I wish I was brainier with electronics...

Study! ;-)

--
Frank Krygowski [email hidden]

net <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

I'm interested to know what is the latest in dynamos/electric power generators for bicycles. I
dont mean the subject of mains power replacement, I mean to power bicycle lights or recharge
batteries while on the move.

<snip>

Quoted message said:

I wish I was brainier with electronics...

A good place to ask these questions is the bikecurrent list:
topica.comreadOpen ↗

These people are brainy.

Jeff

Frank Krygowski said:

net said:

I'm interested to know what is the latest in dynamos/electric power generators for bicycles. I
dont mean the subject of mains power replacement, I mean to power bicycle lights or recharge
batteries while on the move. I've searched around a bit using google and viewed a few online
cycle shops but can find little info on this.

See myra-simon.comdynotest.htmlOpen ↗

That's interesting. Unfortunately, what seems to be a very good new dynamo is not included in this
test: the LightSpin.

According to VeloPlus' current data, the LightSpin is the most efficient dynamo on the market today,
even better than Schmidt's dynamo hub, as can be seen in their test results (in german, but the
table is easily understood):

veloplus.chinfo beleuchtung.htmlOpen ↗

There was an article in the first issue of VeloVision (velovision.co.ukvelovision.co.ukOpen ↗) about the
LightSpin, which is available as a PDF file there (in english):

eland.uklinux.netissue1lightspin.pdfOpen ↗

Finally, the maker of the dynamo has a web site which includes some information about its product:

dynosys-ag.chdynosys-ag.chOpen ↗

(Disclaimer: I have no relationship with them, I'm not even a customer, but I read several good
reviews of this dynamo).

Michel.

"Michel Schinz" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Frank Krygowski said:

net said:

I'm interested to know what is the latest in dynamos/electric power generators for bicycles. I
dont mean the subject of mains power replacement, I mean to power bicycle lights or recharge
batteries while on the move. I've searched around a bit using google and viewed a few online
cycle shops but can find little info on this.

See myra-simon.comdynotest.htmlOpen ↗

That's interesting. Unfortunately, what seems to be a very good new dynamo is not included in this
test: the LightSpin.

If I remember correctly, the article is a few years old, and compares, amongst other things, an old
version of the Shimano Nexus Dynohub. There is some data available on Peter White Cycle's website.
See peterwhitecycles.competerwhitecycles.comOpen ↗ and check for products/lights. Peter White sells the SON -- an
expensive but great no-friction hub (well, almost) -- and the Shimano Nexus, which is also very
good, although a bit notchy _when_ the light is turned on, but not when the light is turned off. If
I compare both, I would say that if you plan to cyle mostly in daytime, the Shimano is a very good
altermative, as it is much cheaper and probably doesn't add too much resistance (in real life: add 5
psi to your tires and you'll break even). On Peter White's site, the technical page on dynamo lights
is a good factual one, which should be read. Apart from the graphics (lifted from SON's website),
all the text is in English.

Alas, the LIghtSpin is not covered. However, I tried to buy one for a few months and it was always
back-order, and I heard of a few reliability problems (on iBOB and Bike Current lists). IOW: buyer
beware, but I would be more cautious, especially if you don't buy locally.

In terms of recharging, there have been a few homebrew projects like that, but it adds weight,
reliability problems, cost... for not too much gain. I would see an advantage for off-road riding,
but then battery-operated lights are likely to be a better and cheaper alternative for such
situations. For on-road riding, the SON and Shimano Nexus with a good headlight (the Lumotec I have
or the BiSi) offer plenty of lighting, except maybe when riding over 20 km/h. Then, a dual-headlight
system as explained on Peter White's site solves the problem. The only real limitation of a
generator-based light is that it shuts down when you stop. It is possible to buy a headlight and a
taillight with a standlight feature that allows 3-5 minutes sitting. Alternatively, it's possible to
use a battery taillight (good autonomy with LEDs) and a generator-based headlight.

BTW, if you want to practice at building wheels, then a lighting system based on a Shimano Nexus
cost about $110-120.

Regards,

Michel Gagnon

Michel Schinz said:

According to VeloPlus' current data, the LightSpin is the most efficient dynamo on the market
today, even better than Schmidt's dynamo hub, as can be seen in their test results (in german, but
the table is easily understood):

However that calculation omits losses in driving the generator with the tire. There are no such
losses with the Schmidt.

Steve Palincsar said:

Michel Schinz said:

According to VeloPlus' current data, the LightSpin is the most efficient dynamo on the market
today, even better than Schmidt's dynamo hub, as can be seen in their test results (in german, but
the table is easily understood):

However that calculation omits losses in driving the generator with the tire. There are no such
losses with the Schmidt.

?? I didn't see any calculations at the referenced website - just some test results reportedly from
the computerized facilities of the Schmidt company in Tubingen. They didn't give any details of the
test setup, but I'd think the most straight-forward way to test dynamos would be to mount them on a
bike frame and see how much input power is required to spin the bike tire and compare to the amount
of electrical produced. There was a footnote on the test for one of the Union models that the medium
level of applied force was chosen for the test, which suggests that the test did involve driving the
dynamo with a bike tire.

On what basis do you conclude that energy losses associated with the bicycle tire were not included?

BTW, does the LightSpin dynamo actually exist as a consumer product (as opposed to prototypes)? If
so are there any dealers who carry it in the US?

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

net wrote:
> I'm interested to know what is the latest in dynamos/electric power generators for bicycles.
> I dont mean the subject of mains power replacement, I mean to power bicycle lights or
> recharge batteries

while

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> on the move. I've searched around a bit using google and viewed a few online cycle shops but
> can find little info on this.

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Frank Krygowski said:

See myra-simon.comdynotest.htmlOpen ↗

Quoted message said:

"Michel Schinz" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

That's interesting. Unfortunately, what seems to be a very good new dynamo is not included in
this test: the LightSpin.

"M Gagnon" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

If I remember correctly, the article is a few years old, and compares, amongst other things, an
old version of the Shimano Nexus Dynohub. There

is

Quoted message said:

some data available on Peter White Cycle's website. See peterwhitecycles.competerwhitecycles.comOpen ↗ and check
for products/lights. Peter White sells the SON -- an expensive but great no-friction hub (well,
almost) -- and the Shimano Nexus, which is also very good, although a bit notchy _when_ the light
is turned on, but not when the light is turned

off.

Quoted message said:

If I compare both, I would say that if you plan to cyle mostly in daytime, the Shimano is a very
good altermative, as it is much cheaper and probably doesn't add too much resistance (in real
life: add 5 psi to your tires and you'll break even). On Peter White's site, the technical page on
dynamo lights is a good

factual

Quoted message said:

one, which should be read. Apart from the graphics (lifted from SON's website), all the text is in
English.

Alas, the LIghtSpin is not covered. However, I tried to buy one for a few months and it was always
back-order, and I heard of a few reliability problems (on iBOB and Bike Current lists). IOW: buyer
beware, but I would

be

Quoted message said:

more cautious, especially if you don't buy locally.

In terms of recharging, there have been a few homebrew projects like that, but it adds weight,
reliability problems, cost... for not too much gain. I would see an advantage for off-road riding,
but then battery-operated

lights

Quoted message said:

are likely to be a better and cheaper alternative for such situations. For on-road riding, the SON
and Shimano Nexus with a good headlight (the

Lumotec

Quoted message said:

I have or the BiSi) offer plenty of lighting, except maybe when riding

over

Quoted message said:

20 km/h. Then, a dual-headlight system as explained on Peter White's site solves the problem. The
only real limitation of a generator-based light is that it shuts down when you stop. It is
possible to buy a headlight and a taillight with a standlight feature that allows 3-5 minutes
sitting. Alternatively, it's possible to use a battery taillight (good autonomy

with

Quoted message said:

LEDs) and a generator-based headlight.

BTW, if you want to practice at building wheels, then a lighting system based on a Shimano Nexus
cost about $110-120.

Lite Spin Hard to find? We have 'em. These things are amazing compared to other bottle dynamos. When
you spin the thing in your fingertips the pulley stays spinning for several seconds. And of course
when it's off the tire there is zero drag. yellowjersey.orglitespin.htmlOpen ↗

--
Andrew Muzi yellowjersey.orgyellowjersey.orgOpen ↗ Open every day since 1 April 1971

M Gagnon <[email hidden]> wrote: [Shimano vs. SON.]

Quoted message said:

If I compare both, I would say that if you plan to cyle mostly in daytime, the Shimano is a very
good altermative,

I think this is backwards, to be frank. The Shimano's performance is much the same when operating as
the SON; but the Shimano's drag is greater when switched off than the SON; hence if you cycle mostly
in daylight the SON is preferable. In the extreme case where you have such peculiar working hours
that you only ever cycle in the dark, the Shimano would be just as good as the SON.

Quoted message said:

are likely to be a better and cheaper alternative for such situations. For on-road riding, the SON
and Shimano Nexus with a good headlight (the Lumotec I have or the BiSi) offer plenty of lighting,
except maybe when riding over 20 km/h.

I think this speed is overly conservative; I have no difficulty at speeds of 40 km/h, which is about
my peak speed on a journey I make regularly sections of which are completely unlit.
--
David Damerell <[email hidden]> flcl?

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 12:36:02 -0400, M Gagnon:

Quoted message said:

If I remember correctly, the article is a few years old,

It is from 1997 - a lot of the newer dynamos were not available then.

Quoted message said:

and compares, amongst other things, an old version of the Shimano Nexus Dynohub.

A fairly actual test was done by german magazin "aktiv Radfahren". It covers the new models by
Shimano, the new model by Schmidt and also the Lightspin.

See a rough translation at: groups.google.comgroupsOpen ↗
=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=7v9j3d%24oe5%241%40pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk&rnum=1

But keep in mind that a laboratory test did not represent the conditions on the road - like the
slipping Lightspin in the wet or the problems of some sidewall dynamos which are heavily shaken on
suspension forks...

Andreas

Steve Palincsar said:

Michel Schinz said:

According to VeloPlus' current data, the LightSpin is the most efficient dynamo on the market
today, even better than Schmidt's dynamo hub, as can be seen in their test results (in german,
but the table is easily understood):

However that calculation omits losses in driving the generator with the tire. There are no such
losses with the Schmidt.

If I recall correctly, the test setup does measure contact driving losses. It's a flywheel with a
bike wheel & tire (or equivalent) and it records the deceleration of the flywheel to determine
generator drag. Anything that would be felt by the rider would also be felt by the flywheel system.

--
Frank Krygowski [email hidden]