Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Ode to DRS

Started by Daveb · · Last activity · 16 posts · 1,304 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
10 July 2004
Last activity
11 July 2004
Original author
Daveb
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,304
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Actually quote for DRS is probably more accurate but ode
    sounded better.

    Just read this in a Bryce Courtney book (Tandia) and it
    seemed so perfect I figured I should post it.

    "We will endeavour to teach you to be right but not
    righteous, to be accurate but not dull; truth-seeking
    without being a pedant, accepting always that some other
    truth may equally exist"

    DaveB (whose 39T chainring just arrived but not enough time
    to fit it before tomorrow's ride, doh!)

  2. Or a extract from "Desiderata" by Max Ehrmann

    As far as possible, without surrender, be on good terms with all persons. Speak your truth quietly and clearly; and listen to others, even to the dull and the ignorant, they too have their story. Avoid loud and aggressive persons, they are vexations to the spirit.

    (with much grinding of teeth)

  3. "DaveB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    Actually quote for DRS is probably more accurate but ode
    sounded better.

    Just read this in a Bryce Courtney book (Tandia) and it
    seemed so perfect I figured I should post it.

    "We will endeavour to teach you to be right but not
    righteous, to be accurate but not dull; truth-seeking
    without being a pedant, accepting always that some other
    truth may equally exist"

    It's a shame it's completely inapplicable here. You either
    post properly or you don't. Top-posting is always wrong on
    Usenet. There is no New Age airy-fairy brain damaged "happy
    medium" here.

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    B: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  4. DRS said:

    "DaveB" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    Actually quote for DRS is probably more accurate but ode
    sounded better.

    Just read this in a Bryce Courtney book (Tandia) and it
    seemed so perfect I figured I should post it.

    "We will endeavour to teach you to be right but not
    righteous, to be accurate but not dull; truth-seeking
    without being a pedant, accepting always that some other
    truth may equally exist"

    It's a shame it's completely inapplicable here. You either
    post properly or you don't. Top-posting is always wrong on
    Usenet. There is no New Age airy-fairy brain damaged
    "happy medium" here.

    I'm pretty sure there was no reference to top posting in
    the original post. The post was all about accepting that
    not everyone will share you point of view and accepting
    that. But as usual, you just don't get it (no surprise
    there really).

    DaveB (who won't be posting again on this thread, post away
    DRS as you seem to believe that if you have the last post it
    proves you were right)

  5. "DaveB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:
    DRS said:

    "DaveB" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]

    [...]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "We will endeavour to teach you to be right but not
    righteous, to be accurate but not dull; truth-seeking
    without being a pedant, accepting always that some other
    truth may equally exist"

    It's a shame it's completely inapplicable here. You
    either post properly or you don't. Top-posting is always
    wrong on Usenet. There is no New Age airy-fairy brain
    damaged "happy medium" here.

    I'm pretty sure there was no reference to top posting in
    the original post. The post was all about accepting that
    not everyone will share you point of view and accepting
    that. But as usual, you just don't get it (no surprise
    there really).

    Oh, I get it. What I also get but you and some others don't
    is that there are some things on which you cannot simply
    agree to disagree. Top-posting is one such.

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    B: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  6. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Daveb
    Actually quote for DRS is probably more accurate but ode
    sounded better.

    Just read this in a Bryce Courtney book (Tandia) and it
    seemed so perfect I figured I should post it.

    "We will endeavour to teach you to be right but not
    righteous, to be accurate but not dull; truth-seeking
    without being a pedant, accepting always that some other
    truth may equally exist"

    DaveB (whose 39T chainring just arrived but not enough time
    to fit it before tomorrow's ride, doh!)

  7. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by mfhor

    Ooops, what happened there?

    Anyway, here's an ode

    Post on, my man, post on, I say
    No dolts nor morons bar your way.
    Let not their consciences subtract
    from your great joy, their faults t'enact
    upon the printed page, nor let
    an ill-deserved epithet
    escape your keyboard, mar your page
    with spat-out dregs of Usenet-rage.
    When you've troubled all your foils
    with calumnies and plagues of boils
    then let at last your fingers rest,
    cos Sonny Jim, you've failed the test.

    "What test? you ask indignantly
    "This Usenet, it was made for me!
    To carp and criticise, to boast
    that herein, me, I know the most!"
    No it wasn't, here I dissent
    To talk to people was it meant.
    By shouting and invoking rules
    you keep from knowing, liking "fools"
    who may not have your large IQ
    but wiser are, to "fools" like you.

    M "too much Dr Seuss as a child" H

  8. I agree , I am a sinner & will burn in the fires of eternal hell,
    probably caused by burning bike tyres Whereas you will be in bottom
    posting heaven, surrounded by all the bottoms you desire. Let's all
    pray it happens soon in your case:-)

    John L.

    Sat, 10 Jul 2004 22:14:42 +1000, "DRS"

    Quoted message said:

    Oh, I get it. What I also get but you and some others don't
    is that there are some things on which you cannot simply
    agree to disagree. Top-posting is one such.

  9. "John L" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    I agree , I am a sinner & will burn in the fires of
    eternal hell, probably caused by burning bike tyres
    Whereas you will be in bottom posting heaven, surrounded
    by all the bottoms you desire. Let's all pray it happens
    soon in your case:-)

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    B: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  10. "mfhor" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]

    [...]

    Quoted message said:

    "What test? you ask indignantly "This Usenet, it was
    made for me!

    I never said, suggested or implied any such thing. I'm
    merely arguing that people should adhere to Usenet standards
    and guidelines. I'm the one arguing for consideration for
    others. I'm the one arguing against selfishness, laziness
    and stupidity.

    Bottom vs. top posting and quotation style on Usenet
    cs.tut.fibrox.html

    Why is Bottom-posting better than Top-posting
    caliburn.nltopposting.html

    blakjak.demon.co.ukgey stv0.htm

    fscked.co.uktop posting cuss.html

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    B: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  11. Try stamping your feet & wetting your pants, that just might work :-)

    John L.

    Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:19:18 +1000, "DRS"

    Quoted message said:

    I never said, suggested or implied any such thing. I'm
    merely arguing that people should adhere to Usenet
    standards and guidelines. I'm the one arguing for
    consideration for others. I'm the one arguing against
    selfishness, laziness and stupidity.

    Bottom vs. top posting and quotation style on Usenet
    cs.tut.fibrox.html

    Why is Bottom-posting better than Top-posting
    caliburn.nltopposting.html

    blakjak.demon.co.ukgey stv0.htm

    fscked.co.uktop posting cuss.html

  12. "John L" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    Try stamping your feet & wetting your pants, that just
    might work :-)

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    B: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  13. Funnily enough, neither does abuse :-)

    But if it makes you feel better, go right ahead.

    Bye now, Ive had enough fun, now I'll go back to reality,
    feel free to keep bottom posting to yourself.

    John L.

    Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:43:57 +1000, "DRS"

    Quoted message said:

    "John L" <[email hidden]> wrote
    in message "]news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    Try stamping your feet & wetting your pants, that just
    might work :-)

  14. "John L" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    Funnily enough, neither does abuse :-)

    Well, if reason and logic don't work with you then I might
    as well get something out of it.

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    B: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

  15. John L said:

    Try stamping your feet & wetting your pants, that just
    might work :-)

    ^K

    YKIMS

    --
    Regards. Richard.

  16. Yes, that would make one person getting something out of
    your posts...

    "DRS" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "John L" <[email hidden]> wrote
    in message "]news:[email hidden]

    Quoted message said:

    Funnily enough, neither does abuse :-)

    Well, if reason and logic don't work with you then I might
    as well get something out of it.

    --

    A: Top-posters.
    Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.