Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Helmet Comparison Articles ??

Started by Churchill · · Last activity · 29 posts · 3,981 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
7 July 2004
Last activity
12 July 2004
Original author
Churchill
Posts
29
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,981
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 29
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hello,

    Do you know where there are any good Helmet reviews for high
    quality helmets ?

    Perhaps, a comparison ?!

    Thank you

  2. What is a 'high quality helmet'? How is helmet quality
    measured?

    "Churchill" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    | Hello,
    |
    | Do you know where there are any good Helmet reviews for
    | high quality
    helmets
    | ?
    |
    | Perhaps, a comparison ?!
    |
    | Thank you
    |
    |

  3. "Churchill" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hello,

    Do you know where there are any good Helmet reviews for
    high quality


    helmets

    Quoted message said:

    ?

    Perhaps, a comparison ?!

    The helmets marketed by the major manufacturers all have the
    same certifications, which is the only guidance you'll find
    as to their potential effectiveness in protecting your head.
    Whether this is worth anything or not is a matter of
    opinion, but it has little bearing on helmet choice, since
    in this regard they're all the same.

    Which leaves fit, style, and comfort. Factors that don't
    stand up to objective comparisons.

    That's why the helmet market is all about image and
    subjectivity, and why price and "quality" have no
    relationship.

    If you want a helmet, you go try on a bunch until you find
    one that fits your head and has a retention system that will
    keep it in place without discomfort, and that you like the
    looks of. If you care about your place in the fashion
    pantheon, you buy one with lots of big holes that costs more
    than $100. If you don't, you buy one with lots of medium
    sized holes that costs $30.

    RichC

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    "Churchill" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hello,

    Do you know where there are any good Helmet reviews for
    high quality


    helmets

    Quoted message said:

    ?

    Perhaps, a comparison ?!

    The helmets marketed by the major manufacturers all have
    the same certifications, which is the only guidance you'll
    find as to their potential

    Mostly, but not completely true: several of Specialized's
    helmet models meet the Snell standards in addition to the
    CPSC and ANSI standards. Most others do not.

    ....

    --
    Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in
    the newsgroups if possible).

  5. Rich Clark said:


    The helmets marketed by the major manufacturers all have
    the same certifications, which is the only guidance you'll
    find as to their potential effectiveness in protecting
    your head. Whether this is worth anything or not is a
    matter of opinion, but it has little bearing on helmet
    choice, since in this regard they're all the same.

    Which leaves fit, style, and comfort. Factors that don't
    stand up to objective comparisons.

    That's why the helmet market is all about image and
    subjectivity, and why price and "quality" have no
    relationship.

    If you want a helmet, you go try on a bunch until you find
    one that fits your head and has a retention system that
    will keep it in place without discomfort, and that you
    like the looks of. If you care about your place in the
    fashion pantheon, you buy one with lots of big holes that
    costs more than $100. If you don't, you buy one with lots
    of medium sized holes that costs $30.

    What Rich says is basically true, but he's omitted one
    thing:

    While all helmets in the USA have to pass the same standard,
    the expensive helmets - those with maximum ventilation,
    minimum weight, up-to-the-minute styling - tend to pass the
    impact standard with lower margins of safety. IOW, when you
    buy a $20 *-Mart helmet, you get more crash protection than
    when you spend $140 to look just like your racing hero.

    Consumer reports occasionally tests helmets, and I believe
    the current issue has such a test.

    --
    --------------------+ Frank Krygowski [To reply, remove
    rodent and vegetable dot com, replace with cc.ysu dot edu]

  6. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    What is a 'high quality helmet'? How is helmet quality
    measured?

    By the amount of money they take from your wallet. 🙂
    Seriously ask any helmet maker if their super expensive
    model protects your head any better than their bargain
    basement model and see what they say.
    --------------
    Alex

  7. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    What is a 'high quality helmet'? How is helmet quality
    measured?

    By the amount of money they take from your wallet. 🙂
    Seriously ask any helmet maker if their super expensive
    model protects your head any better than their bargain
    basement model and see what they say.

    They'll say they don't! They'll be perfectly willing to
    admit that their top-line helmets are no safer than their
    less-expensive models. Once you get to the level of helmet
    where fit issues have been addressed (which occurs around
    $40), you don't buy a safer helmet when you go up the
    ladder. What you do (hopefully) get are-

    #1: Better ventilation. High-end helmets are often subject
    # to wind-tunnel
    tests in a quest to improve aerodynamics and measure
    cooling.

    #2: Better graphics & appearance. Higher-end helmets are
    # screened better,
    and the expanded polystyrene material is molded
    directly into the plastic shell, rather than being
    glued & taped to it.

    #3: Lighter weight. It takes a lot of work to get helmet
    # weight down,
    while retaining the same crash protection.

    What you generally won't see is a manufacturer saying that
    one of their helmets is safer than another, as the admission
    that something isn't as safe as it could be is an invitation
    to lawsuits. However, it's entirely possible (perhaps even
    likely) that a less-expensive model may offer greater crash
    protection than a high-end one. Why? Because the
    manufacturer is going to work at shaving as much weight as
    possible from a high-end helmet until it can just pass the
    standards (tests) they're looking for. A lower-end helmet,
    on the other hand, isn't going to go through such scrutiny.
    If it passes the standard test, they're not going to go to
    the time & expense of finding out how much tougher a test it
    will pass, nor will they find out what they can remove or
    redesign and still have it pass.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

  8. Quoted message said:

    While all helmets in the USA have to pass the same
    standard, the expensive helmets - those with maximum
    ventilation, minimum weight, up-to-the-minute styling -
    tend to pass the impact standard with lower margins of
    safety. IOW, when you buy a $20 *-Mart helmet, you get
    more crash protection than when you spend $140 to look
    just like your racing hero.

    Not quite- the very cheapest helmets tend not to fit very
    well, and if the helmet's moving around on your head or
    incorrectly fastened, it's not likely to protect as well.
    The sweet spot- the place where you get the superior
    fit/retension systems- is around $40.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

  9. On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 10:09:58 -0400, David Kerber
    <ns_dkerber@ns_ids.net> wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The helmets marketed by the major manufacturers all have
    the same certifications, which is the only guidance
    you'll find as to their potential

    Quoted message said:

    Mostly, but not completely true: several of Specialized's
    helmet models meet the Snell standards in addition to the
    CPSC and ANSI standards. Most others do not.

    Endorsed. I was told by the guy who tests helemts to
    standards in the UK that Specialized is the only major brand
    he will recommend.

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after
    posting. chapmancentral.co.ukchapmancentral.co.uk

    88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at
    Washington University

  10. Frank Krygowski said:

    While all helmets in the USA have to pass the same
    standard, the expensive helmets - those with maximum
    ventilation, minimum weight, up-to-the-minute styling -
    tend to pass the impact standard with lower margins of
    safety. IOW, when you buy a $20 *-Mart helmet, you get more
    crash protection than when you spend $140 to look just like
    your racing hero.

    There may well be a lot of truth in this. Look at the list
    of manufacturers certified to Snell standards:

    AGV SpA Arai Helmet, Ltd. Hong Kong Sports Helmet Mfg., Ltd.
    Limar Mien Yow Industry Co., Ltd. OGK Hanbai Co., Ltd.
    ProRider, Inc. Qranc Specialized Bicycle Components
    Strategic Sports Ltd. Tong Ho Hsing Industrial Co., Ltd.
    Tung Kuang I Light Industry Co., Ltd. Zhu Hai Safety Helmet
    Manufacture Co. Ltd Zhuhai Golex Helmet-Making Co., Ltd.
    Zhuhai Star Safety Helmets Co., Ltd.

    I don't think I've missed any out.

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after
    posting. chapmancentral.co.ukchapmancentral.co.uk

    88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at
    Washington University

  11. Frank Krygowski said:
    Rich Clark said:


    The helmets marketed by the major manufacturers all have
    the same certifications, which is the only guidance
    you'll find as to their potential effectiveness in
    protecting your head. Whether this is worth anything or
    not is a matter of opinion, but it has little bearing on
    helmet choice, since in this regard they're all the same.

    Which leaves fit, style, and comfort. Factors that don't
    stand up to objective comparisons.

    That's why the helmet market is all about image and
    subjectivity, and why price and "quality" have no
    relationship.

    If you want a helmet, you go try on a bunch until you
    find one that fits your head and has a retention system
    that will keep it in place without discomfort, and that
    you like the looks of. If you care about your place in
    the fashion pantheon, you buy one with lots of big holes
    that costs more than $100. If you don't, you buy one with
    lots of medium sized holes that costs $30.

    What Rich says is basically true, but he's omitted
    one thing:

    While all helmets in the USA have to pass the same
    standard, the expensive helmets - those with maximum
    ventilation, minimum weight, up-to-the-minute styling -
    tend to pass the impact standard with lower margins of
    safety. IOW, when you buy a $20 *-Mart helmet, you get more
    crash protection than when you spend $140 to look just like
    your racing hero.

    Consumer reports occasionally tests helmets, and I believe
    the current issue has such a test.

    Dear Frank,

    Yes, the July 2004 Consumer Reports tests helmets with the
    ratings on page 45.

    None of 15 adult helmets were rated excellent for impact.
    Two were rated unacceptable because their straps didn't
    hold them on.

    A $45 Louis Garneau leads the pack in impact, followed by a
    $60 Trek, with both rated very good.

    A $140 Giro and a pair of $100 Bell helmets are rated only
    good on impact.

    The only adult helmet rated with a black half circle (fair)
    for impact was a $25 Bell.

    The variety is bewildering.The Nashbar catalogue that
    just arrived lists 37 helmet models, plus another 18 on
    close-out.

    Carl Fogel

  12. Churchill said:

    Hello,

    Do you know where there are any good Helmet reviews for
    high quality helmets ?

    If you accept that none of them are really likely to work in
    a serious accident, you might as well buy the one you like
    the look of. I wear one when I am made to do so (e.g. by
    velodrome owners). I don't expect it to save me: it's just
    there so I am allowed to ride.

  13. "Just zis Guy, you know?" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 10:09:58 -0400, David Kerber
    <ns_dkerber@ns_ids.net> wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The helmets marketed by the major manufacturers all
    have the same certifications, which is the only
    guidance you'll find as to their


    potential

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Mostly, but not completely true: several of Specialized's
    helmet models meet the Snell standards in addition to the
    CPSC and ANSI standards. Most others do not.

    Endorsed. I was told by the guy who tests helemts to
    standards in the UK that Specialized is the only major
    brand he will recommend.

    Not that I think it matters, but note that Specialized
    helmets are certified only to the Snell B-90 standard,
    which is no more demanding than the CPSC standard. That
    Snell did the certification tests and that Specialized paid
    for them (and the additional cost per helmet for the Snell
    sticker) may or may not mean anything to you, beyond the
    higher price.

    Me, I'm willing to accept that companies like Giro/Bell or
    Trek are capable of making sure their helmets meet the
    standards. If a Specialized helmet was a better fit at a
    given price point, that's what I'd buy. Everything else is
    highly theoretical and pretty much improvable.

    RichC

  14. "Just zis Guy, you know?" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 10:17:50 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    While all helmets in the USA have to pass the same
    standard, the expensive helmets - those with maximum
    ventilation, minimum weight, up-to-the-minute styling -
    tend to pass the impact standard with lower margins of
    safety. IOW, when you buy a $20 *-Mart helmet, you get
    more crash protection than when you spend $140 to look
    just like your racing hero.

    There may well be a lot of truth in this. Look at the list
    of manufacturers certified to Snell standards:

    AGV SpA Arai Helmet, Ltd. Hong Kong Sports Helmet Mfg.,
    Ltd. Limar Mien Yow Industry Co., Ltd. OGK Hanbai Co.,
    Ltd. ProRider, Inc. Qranc Specialized Bicycle Components
    Strategic Sports Ltd. Tong Ho Hsing Industrial Co., Ltd.
    Tung Kuang I Light Industry Co., Ltd. Zhu Hai Safety
    Helmet Manufacture Co. Ltd Zhuhai Golex Helmet-Making Co.,
    Ltd. Zhuhai Star Safety Helmets Co., Ltd.

    I don't think I've missed any out.

    Guy

    Interesting, around the shops in Ottawa, ON., Canada the big
    sellers are Giro, Bell and Louis Garneau and not one is on
    the list -🙂

    Good thing I asked !!

  15. "Zog The Undeniable" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:40ec55fb.0@entanet...

    Quoted message said:
    Churchill said:

    Hello,

    Do you know where there are any good Helmet reviews for
    high quality


    helmets

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    ?

    If you accept that none of them are really likely to work
    in a serious accident, you might as well buy the one you
    like the look of. I wear one when I am made to do so (e.g.
    by velodrome owners). I don't expect it to save me: it's
    just there so I am allowed to ride.

    I disagree, depending on the impact the rider has a barrier
    could save a head injury. However, there are limits !

  16. On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 16:25:13 -0400, "Rich Clark"
    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    Me, I'm willing to accept that companies like Giro/Bell or
    Trek are capable of making sure their helmets meet the
    standards. If a Specialized helmet was a better fit at a
    given price point, that's what I'd buy. Everything else is
    highly theoretical and pretty much improvable.

    But the guy who tests them disagrees. He has had a lot of
    helmets fail the tests, even though they are notionally
    certified (CPSC has no independent testing, we're told). The
    only major brand he'll recommend, based on having hit and
    broken rather a lot of lids over the years, is Specialized.
    You can take that as you will.

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after
    posting. chapmancentral.co.ukchapmancentral.co.uk

    88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at
    Washington University

  17. On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 16:29:29 -0400, "Churchill" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    Interesting, around the shops in Ottawa, ON., Canada the
    big sellers are Giro, Bell and Louis Garneau and not one is
    on the list -🙂

    Maybe Bell is spending so much on funding dodgy
    "research" that they can't afford the certification
    programme any more ;-)

    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after
    posting. chapmancentral.co.ukchapmancentral.co.uk

    88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at
    Washington University

  18. "Badger_South" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    cf.consumerreports.orgindex.cfm
    6&storynumber=1&station=wisn

    Quoted message said:


    Here's an interesting CU report on helmets for those
    helmet fans:


    consumersearch.combicycl
    e_helmets/fullstory.html

    Thanks, that is what I was looking for 🙂

  19. hit a curb with my helmet on, at 20 mph, while wearing Giro
    Pneumo. I was not overly impressed with the results. I was
    knocked out for about 1 minute. Took about 2 hours for my
    thinking to return to normal. There was some cracking and
    broken Styrofoam, but not as much as I expected. Most of the
    torn styro was where the straps connect to the helmet. I
    feel if more of the helmet would have disintegrated, I
    wouldn't have ended up with such a headache.

  20. "Callistus Valerius" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    hit a curb with my helmet on, at 20 mph, while wearing
    Giro Pneumo. I was not overly impressed with the results.
    I was knocked out for about 1 minute. Took about 2 hours
    for my thinking to return to normal. There


    was

    Quoted message said:

    some cracking and broken Styrofoam, but not as much as I
    expected. Most


    of

    Quoted message said:

    the torn styro was where the straps connect to the helmet.
    I feel if more of the helmet would have disintegrated, I
    wouldn't have ended up with such


    a

    Quoted message said:

    headache.

    Sorry, there's nothing in any of the standards about
    protecting the wearer in a 20mph impact. If you have an
    embarrassing clipping-out incident at a stop light, however,
    you can probably rely on it to keep your head from denting
    the SUV waiting next to you.

    RichC

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.