This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_045E_01C4613C.13D1B8E0 Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
HOWEVER YOU LEFTIST HAVE NO PROBLEMS KILLING MILLIONS OF
BABY'S IN THE = WOMB WITHOUT CONSULTING THEM. DURING THE
BLACK PLAGUE THAT DEVASTATED = EUROPE THE JEWS WERE HARDLY
AFFECTED. THIS IS DUE TO THE PRACTICE OF = CIRCUMCISION.
SO ALL YOU LEFTIST WACKOS CAN GO TO LIVE IN SYRIA WITH =
YOUR LOVERS.
--=20 PETER
If the Arabs put down their weapons today, there would be no
more = violence. If the Jews put down their weapons today,
there would be no more Israel.
"answers_here" <[email hidden]> wrote in message =
"]news:[email hidden]...
Circumcision is non-consensual body modification, i.e.
mutilation.*
If it's okay to mutilate someone against their will or
without their consent, then it must be okay to kill
someone (how about removing their heart?) If you think
it's okay for you to murder people, then you must admit
that it's okay for others to murder you.
A far better philosophy is one of unalienable rights. All
beings have an unalienable right to life and freedom, and
that includes freedom from mutilation. Unalienable rights
are not owed to you by anybody, but they should not be
violated. The philosophy of unalienable rights is a closer
representation of the truth than that of war or murder,
and perhaps as you enter into all truth, you will find
your rights truly unalienable.
If everyone refrains from violating the person and
property of others, the world will remain at peace.
The line must be drawn somewhere, and we hope the state is
not too oppressive in its restrictions. Lest we conclude
there is no guiding light and no philosophy, and that the
state merely imposes itself on others with no regard. In
which case, we must conclude that it is okay for us to do
the same to the state and that the state is as wrong as it
claims us to be. Then we must either choose to suffer
evils while evils are sufferable, or engage the philosophy
of "Give me Liberty, or give me death" and go to war to
free ourselves of oppressive bondage.
*People under 18, and certainly those under 12, cannot
consent to circumcision and a whole host of other
activities.
"Paul Abeles" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
= news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:Routine circumcisions have been found to violate not
only the Golden =
Rule,
Quoted message said:but the first tenet of medical practice, First, Do
No Harm. =
Amazingly,
Quoted message said:circumcision violates all seven Principles of the A.M.A.
Code of =
Ethics.
Quoted message said:=20
Circumcision is not surgery, by definition. Surgical
procedures have =
been
Quoted message said:defined as: repair of wounds, extirpation of diseased
organs or =
tissue,
Quoted message said:reconstructive surgery, and physiologic surgery (i.e. =
sympathectomy).
Quoted message said:Routine circumcision does not fall into any of these
categories. =
Therefore,
Quoted message said:routine infant male circumcision is not a valid surgical
procedure. =
Doctors'
Quoted message said:licenses do not permit them to cut people unless they
are performing surgery, nor may they harm their
patients.
=20
America has the highest rate of AIDS in the
industrialized world, =
and is the
Quoted message said:only major country which circumcises a majority of its
males. Is =
there a
Quoted message said:connection? We do not know. Before a doctor performs a
circumcision, =
must he
Quoted message said:not have the answer to this question: might this baby
have an =
increased risk
Quoted message said:of AIDS - as the result of circumcision?
=20
American men are now documenting the harm that has been
done to them =
by
Quoted message said:doctors who operated on them without their consent. The
bizarre =
practice of
Quoted message said:having parents tell a doctor whether and when to operate
occurs =
nowhere else
Quoted message said:in medicine. According to modern medical ethics, parents
do not have =
the
Quoted message said:right to consent to a procedure that is not in their
son's best =
interests.
not in
Quoted message said:their son's best interests
=20 20 20
Read more on
faculty.washington.eduend.htmlOpen ↗
------=_NextPart_000_045E_01C4613C.13D1B8E0 Content-Type:
text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0
Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-
Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META
content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><STRONG>HOWEVER YOU LEFTIST HAVE NO PROBLEMS KILLING
MILLIONS OF = BABY'S IN=20 THE WOMB WITHOUT
CONSULTING THEM. DURING THE BLACK PLAGUE THAT =
DEVASTATED EUROPE=20 THE JEWS WERE HARDLY AFFECTED.
THIS IS DUE TO THE PRACTICE OF = CIRCUMCISION. SO=20
ALL YOU LEFTIST WACKOS CAN GO TO LIVE IN SYRIA WITH
YOUR = LOVERS.</STRONG></DIV>
<DV><BR>-- <BR>PETER</DIV>
<DVI> </DIV>
<DVII>If the Arabs put down their weapons today, there
would be no more=20 violence.<BR>If the Jews put down
their weapons today, there would be no = more=20
Israel.</DIV>
<DVIII> </DIV>
<DIX> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT:
0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-
LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DX>"answers_here" <<A=20 href=3D"mailto:answers1007@l-
ycos.com">[email hidden]</A>> = wrote in=20
message <A=20
=
href=3D"-"]news:[email hidden]-
">news:860a2c8= [email hidden]</A>-
...</DIV>Circumcision=20 is non-consensual body
modification, i.e. mutilation.*<BR><BR><BR>If = it's okay=20
to mutilate someone against their will or without
their<BR>consent, = then it=20 must be okay to kill someone
(how about removing<BR>their = heart?) If you=20 think
it's okay for you to murder people, then<BR>you must admit
that = it's=20 okay for others to murder you.<BR><BR>A far
better philosophy is one = of=20 unalienable rights.
All beings have<BR>an unalienable right to = life and=20
freedom, and that includes freedom<BR>from mutilation.
= Unalienable=20 rights are not owed to you by
anybody,<BR>but they should not be=20 violated. The
philosophy of unalienable rights<BR>is a closer=20
representation of the truth than that of war or
murder,<BR>and perhaps = as you=20 enter into all truth, you
will find your rights<BR>truly=20 unalienable.<BR><BR>If
everyone refrains from violating the person and =
property of others,<BR>the world will remain at
peace.<BR><BR>The line = must be=20 drawn somewhere, and
we hope the state is not too<BR>oppressive in its =
restrictions. Lest we conclude there is no
guiding<BR>light and = no=20 philosophy, and that the
state merely imposes itself on<BR>others with = no=20
regard. In which case, we must conclude that it
is<BR>okay for = us to do=20 the same to the state and
that the state is as wrong<BR>as it claims = us to=20
be. Then we must either choose to suffer
evils<BR>while evils = are=20 sufferable, or engage the
philosophy of "Give me<BR>Liberty, or give = me death"=20
and go to war to free ourselves of<BR>oppressive =
bondage.<BR><BR><BR>*People=20 under 18, and certainly
those under 12, cannot consent = to<BR>circumcision and=20
a whole host of other activities.<BR><BR><BR><BR>"Paul
Abeles" <<A=20
=
href=3D""][email hidden]">[email hidden]-
nospam</A>>= wrote=20 in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:<3thyc.4028$sj4.3727@news-
server.bigpond.net.au">news:<3t= hyc.4028$sj4.3727@news-
server.bigpond.net.au</A>>...<BR>>=20 Routine
circumcisions have been found to violate not only the
Golden=20 Rule,<BR>> but the first tenet of medical
practice, First, Do No = Harm.=20 Amazingly,<BR>>
circumcision violates all seven Principles of the =
A.M.A.=20 Code of Ethics.<BR>> <BR>> Circumcision is
not surgery, by = definition.=20 Surgical procedures
have been<BR>> defined as: repair of wounds,=20
extirpation of diseased organs or tissue,<BR>>
reconstructive = surgery, and=20 physiologic surgery
(i.e. sympathectomy).<BR>> Routine circumcision =
does=20 not fall into any of these categories.
Therefore,<BR>> routine = infant male=20
circumcision is not a valid surgical procedure.
Doctors'<BR>> = licenses do=20 not permit them to
cut people unless they are performing<BR>> =
surgery, nor=20 may they harm their patients.<BR>>
<BR>> America has the highest = rate of=20 AIDS in
the industrialized world, and is the<BR>> only
major = country which=20 circumcises a majority of its
males. Is there a<BR>> connection? We = do not=20
know. Before a doctor performs a circumcision, must
he<BR>> not = have the=20 answer to this question:
might this baby have an increased = risk<BR>> of=20
AIDS - as the result of circumcision?<BR>> <BR>>
American men = are now=20 documenting the harm that
has been done to them by<BR>> doctors who =
operated on them without their consent. The bizarre
practice = of<BR>> having=20 parents tell a doctor
whether and when to operate occurs nowhere =
else<BR>>=20 in medicine. According to modern medical
ethics, parents do not have=20 the<BR>> right to
consent to a procedure that is not in their son's =
best=20 interests.<BR>> The removal of a healthy,
normal part of the male =
organ is not in<BR>> their son's best interests<BR>>
<BR>> = <BR>>=20 <BR>> Read more on <A=20
=
href=3D"faculty.washington.eduend.htmlOpen ↗">htt-
p://faculty.wa= shington.edu/gcd/DOC/end.html</A></BLOCKQUO-
TE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_045E_01C4613C.13D1B8E0--