Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the
expesive bikes?
Kerry kjkerr at cvty.com
Mountain Bikes · Public discussion
treks
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Mountain Bikes
- Published
- 29 June 2004
- Last activity
- 30 June 2004
- Original author
- Kjkerr
- Posts
- 13
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 841
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
kjkerr said:
Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the
expesive bikes?Kerry kjkerr at cvty.com
No they are not suitable. You need even cheaper bikes in
order to mountain bike. Check out the Huffy's at Walmart.
Only $99 bikes are mountain bikes. -
On 2004-06-29, kjkerr penned:
Quoted message said:
Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the
expesive bikes?Is $4800 expensive enough for you? If so, you could look at
a Trek Fuel
100.Treks come in a variety of prices, from really cheap to
really expensive. What *model* of Trek were you looking at?--
monique -
"kjkerr" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the
expesive bikes?I hope you're wearing your flame retardent suit...
- CA-G
Can-Am Girls Kick Ass!
-
kjkerr said:
Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the
expesive bikes?Kerry kjkerr at cvty.com
Yes and no, depending on what Trek and what "expensive" bike
it's being compared to.Matt
-
kjkerr said:
Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the
expesive bikes?<sarcasm>No, they've just managed to be one of the top-
selling mountain bike brands just because of their cool
name.</sarcasm>That question is so open-ended and flame-prone that its hard
to tell if you're even serious in asking it.--
-BB- To reply to me, drop the attitude (from my e-mail
address, at least) -
kjkerr said:
Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the
expesive bikes?Did you see last year's Tour?
Bill "meaning unsure" S.
-
kjkerr said:
Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the
expesive bikes?Kerry kjkerr at cvty.com
Drum roll for JD! 🙂
--
- Zilla Cary, NC (Remove XSPAM) -
kjkerr said:
Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to the
expesive bikes?Kerry kjkerr at cvty.com
Seems like the Trek Fuel 100 I just read a review of was
about $4900 and yes, Treks great. Even cheaper ones,
like mine. -
Shawn Curry said:
Carla A-G said:
"kjkerr" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to
the expesive bikes?I hope you're wearing your flame retardent suit...
Damn, I hate dyslexia. I first read that as "I hope you're
wearing your flame suit [censored]." ;-)Shawn
I think the message is the same either way.
-
"Shawn Curry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Damn, I hate dyslexia. I first read that as "I hope you're
wearing your flame suit [censored]." ;-)I usually don't insult people unless I know them well
enough :-)- CA-G
Can-Am Girls Kick Ass!
-
jem <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
kjkerr said:
Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to
the expesive bikes?Kerry kjkerr at cvty.com
Seems like the Trek Fuel 100 I just read a review of was
about $4900 and yes, Treks great. Even cheaper ones,
like mine.This is funny. The bottom line is that it all starts at the
frame. You could put XTR on a walgoose and it would still
be a walgoose, albeit a $4900 walgoose. There's one born
every minute...JD
-
JD said:
jem <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<GhqEc.-
[email hidden]>...Quoted message said:
kjkerr said:
Are treks suitable for mountain biking as compared to
the expesive bikes?Kerry kjkerr at cvty.com
Seems like the Trek Fuel 100 I just read a review of was
about $4900 and yes, Treks great. Even cheaper ones,
like mine.This is funny. The bottom line is that it all starts at
the frame. You could put XTR on a walgoose and it would
still be a walgoose, albeit a $4900 walgoose. There's one
born every minute...JD
<cymbalcrash.wav>
--
- Zilla Cary, NC (Remove XSPAM)
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.