General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Trans Fats

Started by Dave · · Last activity · 18 posts · 1,968 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
25 June 2004
Last activity
5 July 2004
Original author
Dave
Posts
18
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,968
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–18 of 18
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I introduced my parents to concerns about trans fats with an
    email link to a Harvard analysis. So, at dinner Sunday my
    dad showed me his new margarine and pointed out that it had
    no trans fats. When I looked at the label I immediately saw
    HYDROGENATED Soybean Oil. However, under fats, Transfats
    were specifically listed as zero. The tub has over 30
    servings, so I'm guessing the tiny serving had less than .5
    grams of transfat. I have read that items less than .5 grams
    are listed as zero. Doing this with transfats seems like
    cheating. The total fat was 5 grams per serving, so I figure
    the transfats could be 10%.

    Is my interpretation right? Anything hydrogenated should be
    a transfat. I had read that trans fat labeling was not
    required until 2006. I don't buy margarine, so I was
    surprised by all this.

    I started to try to explain about serving sizes to my 74
    year old dad, but he is certain that there are no transfats
    in the tub.

    Dave
    health.groups.yahoo.comlinks

    health.groups.yahoo.comLowCarbHighFat

    [email hidden]

  2. Dave said:


    I introduced my parents to concerns about trans fats with
    an email link to a Harvard analysis. So, at dinner Sunday
    my dad showed me his new margarine and pointed out that it
    had no trans fats. When I looked at the label I
    immediately saw HYDROGENATED Soybean Oil. However, under
    fats, Transfats were specifically listed as zero. The tub
    has over 30 servings, so I'm guessing the tiny serving had
    less than .5 grams of transfat. I have read that items
    less than .5 grams are listed as zero. Doing this with
    transfats seems like cheating. The total fat was 5 grams
    per serving, so I figure the transfats could be 10%.

    Is my interpretation right? Anything hydrogenated should
    be a transfat. I had read that trans fat labeling was not
    required until 2006. I don't buy margarine, so I was
    surprised by all this.

    I started to try to explain about serving sizes to my 74
    year old dad, but he is certain that there are no
    transfats in the tub.

    Note that trans fatty acids are unsaturated fatty acids that
    have gone through the hydrogenation process without getting
    hydrogenated. Strictly speaking only "partially hydrogenated
    oils" should have trans fats. Fully hydrogenated fats/oils
    should have no trans fats as they have no unsaturated fat at
    all. Whether the food labelling legal directives allow some
    loopholes I don't know.

    MattLB

  3. "Dave" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I introduced my parents to concerns about trans fats with
    an email link to


    a

    Quoted message said:

    Harvard analysis. So, at dinner Sunday my dad showed me
    his new margarine and pointed out that it had no trans
    fats. When I looked at the label I immediately saw
    HYDROGENATED Soybean Oil. However, under fats, Transfats
    were specifically listed as zero. The tub has over 30
    servings, so I'm guessing the tiny serving had less than
    .5 grams of transfat. I have read that items less than .5
    grams are listed as zero. Doing this with


    transfats

    Quoted message said:

    seems like cheating. The total fat was 5 grams per
    serving, so I figure the transfats could be 10%.

    Is my interpretation right? Anything hydrogenated should
    be a transfat.


    I

    Quoted message said:

    had read that trans fat labeling was not required
    until 2006. I don't buy margarine, so I was surprised
    by all this.

    I started to try to explain about serving sizes to my 74
    year old dad, but he is certain that there are no
    transfats in the tub.

    Dave
    health.groups.yahoo.comlinks

    health.groups.yahoo.comLowCarbHighFat

    [email hidden]

    I don't know about the exact details on this item but it's
    true in general that if the amount of X in a product falls
    below a threshold level, the producer is allowed to claim
    it's zero.

    About the 2006 schedule it's amazing what the companies can
    pull out. Every time the FTC comes up with something to
    prohibit false advertising, the companies claim they need
    time to get it on the label. But it has made my head spin
    how fast they have come out with labeling on carbs and
    transfats even though I know it has to do with $$$$$.

  4. Quoted message said:

    Note that trans fatty acids are unsaturated fatty acids
    that have gone through the hydrogenation process without
    getting hydrogenated. Strictly speaking only "partially
    hydrogenated oils" should have trans fats. Fully
    hydrogenated fats/oils should have no trans fats as they
    have no unsaturated fat at all. Whether the food labelling
    legal directives allow some loopholes I don't know.

    MattLB

    Hmmm.

    If I understand you, saturated fats cannot be made in trans
    fats. Soybean oil is 14% saturated fat, so I figure the
    other 86% is unsaturated fat. When you say that a fully
    hydrogenated fat or oil would have no trans fats because
    they have no unsaturated fat, you imply that our example,
    hydrogenated soybean oil has no transfats. However, if the
    soybean oil is 86% unsaturated fat, the result of
    hydrogenation should produce trans fats. No?

    Your first sentence seems to say that unsaturated fatty
    acids can go through the hydrogenation process without
    getting hydrogenated. This seems self contradictory.
    Can a house go through the painting process without
    getting painted?

    Either I am seriously failing to understand you, or you are
    yanking my chain. The later would not be unusual on USENET.

    Dave
    health.groups.yahoo.comlinks

    health.groups.yahoo.comLowCarbHighFat

    [email hidden]

  5. In sci.med.nutrition Dave said:

    However, if the soybean oil is 86% unsaturated fat, the
    result of hydrogenation should produce trans fats.

    Hydrogenation produces saturates, partial hydrogenation
    produces trans-fatty acids.

    --
    Cliff Stamp [email hidden]
    physics.mun.ca~sstamp

    The one unforgivable sin, the offence against one's own
    integrity, is to accept anything at all simply on authority
    -- Maureen Johnson Long

    Anyone can hold the helm when the sea is calm. --
    Publilius Syrus

  6. The term hydrogenation stems from the chemical structure of
    lipids. Every lipid molecule is simple a carbon chain with
    varying numbers of hydrogen atoms attatched and varying
    numbers of double bonds. "saturation" is the degree to which
    the maximum number of hydrogen bonds are attatched....so
    unsaturated fats have fewer H atoms while saturated fats are
    fully loaded with the maximum H atoms possible per carbon
    atom. Saturated fat has no double bonds to the structure is
    flatter and the molecules pack together....hence its solid
    at room temperature. Unsaturated fats have some double bonds
    between carbon atoms and so don't have the maximal amount of
    H atoms. This results in a less linear structure so the
    lipids don't pack together as well....thus liquid at room
    temperature. Mono-unsaturated fat has one double bond while
    polyunsaturated can have three (the omega-3's), six (the
    omega 6's) and on up.

    so, trans-fat is produced commercially by forcing normally
    unsaturated fats (vegetable oils) to give up some of their
    double bonds and accept more H atoms. Hence the fat is now
    partially hydrogenated...still has some double bonds, but
    less than it naturally should. Food companies do this
    because the partially hydrogenated oils have different
    melting points and other properties that they find
    desirable to make their food last longer on the
    shelf.....oh and impair our health. These trans-fats have
    conformations unlike naturally saturated or naturally
    unsaturated fats and, as I understand it, when the body
    trys to encorporate these weird shapes into membranes, etc.
    things don't work as well.

    Hopefully this helps, I'm going off what I remember from
    nutritional biochem so some details may be less than exact,
    but the general gist is right.

    Cheers! Lisa

    "Dave" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Note that trans fatty acids are unsaturated fatty acids
    that have gone through the hydrogenation process
    without getting hydrogenated. Strictly speaking only
    "partially hydrogenated oils" should have trans fats.
    Fully hydrogenated fats/oils should have no trans fats
    as they have no unsaturated fat at all. Whether the
    food labelling legal directives allow some loopholes I
    don't know.

    MattLB

    Hmmm.

    If I understand you, saturated fats cannot be made in
    trans fats. Soybean oil is 14% saturated fat, so I figure
    the other 86% is unsaturated fat. When you say that a
    fully hydrogenated fat or oil would have no trans fats
    because they have no unsaturated fat, you imply that our
    example, hydrogenated soybean oil has no transfats.
    However, if the soybean oil is 86% unsaturated fat, the
    result of hydrogenation should produce trans fats. No?

    Your first sentence seems to say that unsaturated fatty
    acids can go through the hydrogenation process without
    getting hydrogenated. This seems self contradictory. Can a
    house go through the painting process without getting
    painted?

    Either I am seriously failing to understand you, or
    you are yanking my chain. The later would not be
    unusual on USENET.

    Dave
    health.groups.yahoo.comlinks

    health.groups.yahoo.comLowCarbHighFat

    [email hidden]

  7. Dave said:


    Quoted message said:

    Note that trans fatty acids are unsaturated fatty acids
    that have gone through the hydrogenation process
    without getting hydrogenated. Strictly speaking only
    "partially hydrogenated oils" should have trans fats.
    Fully hydrogenated fats/oils should have no trans fats
    as they have no unsaturated fat at all. Whether the
    food labelling legal directives allow some loopholes I
    don't know.

    MattLB

    Hmmm.

    If I understand you, saturated fats cannot be made in
    trans fats. Soybean oil is 14% saturated fat, so I figure
    the other 86% is unsaturated fat. When you say that a
    fully hydrogenated fat or oil would have no trans fats
    because they have no unsaturated fat, you imply that our
    example, hydrogenated soybean oil has no transfats.
    However, if the soybean oil is 86% unsaturated fat, the
    result of hydrogenation should produce trans fats. No?

    Your first sentence seems to say that unsaturated fatty
    acids can go through the hydrogenation process without
    getting hydrogenated.

    That's true.

    Quoted message said:

    This seems self contradictory. Can a house go through the
    painting process without getting painted?

    If you don't have enough paint, yes.

    Quoted message said:

    Either I am seriously failing to understand you, or
    you are yanking my chain. The later would not be
    unusual on USENET.

    No chain yanking, I promise. A bit of background: Saturated
    fats have straight fatty acids, whereas unsaturated fats
    have kinked fatty acids. This leads to saturated fat being
    solid a room temperature, whereas unsaturated fat is liquid
    (oil). To make margarine, which is solid, requires
    converting some of the unsaturated (with hydrogen) oil to
    saturated fat. This is done by pumping hydrogen gas through
    the oil in the presence of a catalyst.

    The catalyst binds and distorts the unsaturated fatty acid
    making it vunerable to attack by the hydrogen. If the
    hydrogen attacks and binds the fatty acid it will no longer
    be unsaturated, it will have become saturated (with
    hydrogen). If there is enough hydrogen and the process is
    done for long enough you should end up with all the fatty
    acids fully hydrogenated (saturated). If the hydrogenation
    is only partial - just enough to make the oil more solid -
    not all of the unsaturated will be turned into saturated.

    If the unsaturated fatty acid is released from the catalyst
    without
    picking up any hydrogen it will spring back to its original
    shape, OR,
    it will spring back in a trans shape. The key thing is that
    this trans
    shape, while still unsaturated is straight instead of
    kinked. This means
    it appears to be a saturated fat and behaves like one
    physically, but as
    soon as the body tries to burn it like saturated fat it
    finds it can't.

    The result is that trans fats hang around in the body and
    are difficult to get rid of without free radicals. Any
    unsaturated fats + free radicals = damage to the body, so
    all in all trans fats are bad news.

    MattLB

  8. Thanks Cliff, So, if I'm getting this, saturated fat created
    in an oil by hydrogenation is not considered a trans fat;
    and trans-fatty acids produced in an oil by partial
    hydrogenation are trans fats. Am I close?

    If so, the studies showing that trans fats caused more CHD
    than saturated fat were studying trans-fatty acids. (?)

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In sci.med.nutrition Dave <LowCarbHighFat-
    [email hidden]>


    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    However, if the soybean oil is 86% unsaturated fat, the
    result of hydrogenation should produce trans fats.

    Hydrogenation produces saturates, partial hydrogenation
    produces


    trans-fatty

    Quoted message said:

    acids.

    --
    Cliff Stamp [email hidden]
    physics.mun.ca~sstamp

    The one unforgivable sin, the offence against one's own
    integrity, is to accept anything at all simply on
    authority -- Maureen Johnson Long

    Anyone can hold the helm when the sea is calm. --
    Publilius Syrus

  9. Wow. Thank you so much.

    So, in a sense it is the catalyst that triggers the problem.
    What do they use as a catalyst?

    If one take an anti-oxidant, will this make it harder for
    the body to remove transfats?

    (I'm thinking of making a webpage out of your explanation.)

    Dave
    health.groups.yahoo.comlinks

    health.groups.yahoo.comLowCarbHighFat

    [email hidden]

    "MattLB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Dave said:


    Quoted message said:

    Note that trans fatty acids are unsaturated fatty
    acids that have gone through the hydrogenation process
    without getting hydrogenated.


    Strictly

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    speaking only "partially hydrogenated oils" should
    have trans fats. Fully hydrogenated fats/oils should
    have no trans fats as they have no unsaturated fat at
    all. Whether the food labelling legal directives allow
    some loopholes I don't know.

    MattLB

    Hmmm.

    If I understand you, saturated fats cannot be made in
    trans fats.


    Soybean

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    oil is 14% saturated fat, so I figure the other 86% is
    unsaturated fat. When you say that a fully hydrogenated
    fat or oil would have no trans


    fats

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    because they have no unsaturated fat, you imply that our
    example, hydrogenated soybean oil has no transfats.
    However, if the soybean oil


    is

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    86% unsaturated fat, the result of hydrogenation should
    produce trans


    fats.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    No?

    Your first sentence seems to say that unsaturated fatty
    acids can go


    through

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the hydrogenation process without getting hydrogenated.

    That's true.

    Quoted message said:

    This seems self contradictory. Can a house go through
    the painting process without


    getting

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    painted?

    If you don't have enough paint, yes.

    Quoted message said:

    Either I am seriously failing to understand you, or you
    are yanking my chain. The later would not be unusual on
    USENET.

    No chain yanking, I promise. A bit of background:
    Saturated fats have straight fatty acids, whereas
    unsaturated fats have kinked fatty acids. This leads to
    saturated fat being solid a room temperature, whereas
    unsaturated fat is liquid (oil). To make margarine, which
    is solid, requires converting some of the unsaturated
    (with hydrogen) oil to saturated fat. This is done by
    pumping hydrogen gas through the oil in the presence of a
    catalyst.

    The catalyst binds and distorts the unsaturated fatty
    acid making it vunerable to attack by the hydrogen. If
    the hydrogen attacks and binds the fatty acid it will no
    longer be unsaturated, it will have become saturated
    (with hydrogen). If there is enough hydrogen and the
    process is done for long enough you should end up with
    all the fatty acids fully hydrogenated (saturated). If
    the hydrogenation is only partial - just enough to make
    the oil more solid - not all of the unsaturated will be
    turned into saturated.

    If the unsaturated fatty acid is released from the catalyst
    without
    picking up any hydrogen it will spring back to its original
    shape, OR,
    it will spring back in a trans shape. The key thing is that
    this trans
    shape, while still unsaturated is straight instead of
    kinked. This means
    it appears to be a saturated fat and behaves like one
    physically, but as
    soon as the body tries to burn it like saturated fat it
    finds it can't.

    The result is that trans fats hang around in the body and
    are difficult to get rid of without free radicals. Any
    unsaturated fats + free radicals = damage to the body, so
    all in all trans fats are bad news.

    MattLB

  10. Dave said:


    Wow. Thank you so much.

    So, in a sense it is the catalyst that triggers the
    problem. What do they use as a catalyst?

    Usually nickel, because it's cheap and easy to get hold of.

    Quoted message said:

    If one take an anti-oxidant, will this make it harder for
    the body to remove transfats?

    Tricky one. The attempted removal of trans fats is done
    by white blood cells, which generate free radicals on
    demand (usually to attack bacteria), so it's possible
    there may be a reduction in their effectiveness with high
    levels of antioxidants. On the other hand the places
    trans fats tend to end up, like the fatty deposits in
    arteries, don't have much in the way of antioxidants
    anyway, which is half the problem.

    Quoted message said:

    (I'm thinking of making a webpage out of your
    explanation.)

    Okay, that'll be 1000 dollars a word :-)

    MattLB

  11. Dave said:


    I introduced my parents to concerns about trans fats with
    an email link to a Harvard analysis. So, at dinner Sunday
    my dad showed me his new margarine and pointed out that it
    had no trans fats. When I looked at the label I
    immediately saw HYDROGENATED Soybean Oil. However, under
    fats, Transfats were specifically listed as zero. The tub
    has over 30 servings, so I'm guessing the tiny serving had
    less than .5 grams of transfat. I have read that items
    less than .5 grams are listed as zero. Doing this with
    transfats seems like cheating. The total fat was 5 grams
    per serving, so I figure the transfats could be 10%.

    Is my interpretation right?

    I don't know if it is really right, but that's the worst
    case. Labels get to round 0.5 down to zero, so assume
    anything that claims zero is actually 0.5 unless you have
    carefully inspected the label and can prove otherwise.

    This is much like using the hidden carb formula to find the
    0.5 amounts of carb in stuff claiming zero. It's a
    pessimistic claim, but how often can you go wrong being
    pessimistic when the label has big print making claims about
    zero, medium print that could be rounded down, nd fine print
    giving ingredients that should mean other than zero?

  12. Doug Freyburger said:
    Dave said:


    I introduced my parents to concerns about trans fats
    with an email link to a Harvard analysis. So, at dinner
    Sunday my dad showed me his new margarine and pointed
    out that it had no trans fats. When I looked at the
    label I immediately saw HYDROGENATED Soybean Oil.
    However, under fats, Transfats were specifically listed
    as zero. The tub has over 30 servings, so I'm guessing
    the tiny serving had less than .5 grams of transfat. I
    have read that items less than .5 grams are listed as
    zero. Doing this with transfats seems like cheating. The
    total fat was 5 grams per serving, so I figure the
    transfats could be 10%.

    Is my interpretation right?

    I don't know if it is really right, but that's the worst
    case. Labels get to round 0.5 down to zero, so assume
    anything that claims zero is actually 0.5 unless you have
    carefully inspected the label and can prove otherwise.

    This is much like using the hidden carb formula to find
    the 0.5 amounts of carb in stuff claiming zero. It's a
    pessimistic claim, but how often can you go wrong being
    pessimistic when the label has big print making claims
    about zero, medium print that could be rounded down, nd
    fine print giving ingredients that should mean other
    than zero?

    I think they should do what they do in Europe: Provide facts
    for 100 grams of material. This way, there'd be no way for
    them to make the serving size tiny, as they do now, in order
    to arbitrarily have low values.

    --
    Bob in CT Remove ".x" to reply

  13. [email hidden] (Doug Freyburger) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Dave said:


    I introduced my parents to concerns about trans fats
    with an email link to a Harvard analysis. So, at dinner
    Sunday my dad showed me his new margarine and pointed
    out that it had no trans fats. When I looked at the
    label I immediately saw HYDROGENATED Soybean Oil.
    However, under fats, Transfats were specifically listed
    as zero. The tub has over 30 servings, so I'm guessing
    the tiny serving had less than .5 grams of transfat. I
    have read that items less than .5 grams are listed as
    zero. Doing this with transfats seems like cheating. The
    total fat was 5 grams per serving, so I figure the
    transfats could be 10%.

    Is my interpretation right?

    I don't know if it is really right, but that's the worst
    case. Labels get to round 0.5 down to zero, so assume
    anything that claims zero is actually 0.5 unless you have
    carefully inspected the label and can prove otherwise.

    This is much like using the hidden carb formula to find
    the 0.5 amounts of carb in stuff claiming zero. It's a
    pessimistic claim, but how often can you go wrong being
    pessimistic when the label has big print making claims
    about zero, medium print that could be rounded down, nd
    fine print giving ingredients that should mean other
    than zero?

    what the large print giveth the small print taketh away

  14. MattLB <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Dave said:


    Quoted message said:

    Note that trans fatty acids are unsaturated fatty
    acids that have gone through the hydrogenation process
    without getting hydrogenated. Strictly speaking only
    "partially hydrogenated oils" should have trans fats.
    Fully hydrogenated fats/oils should have no trans fats
    as they have no unsaturated fat at all. Whether the
    food labelling legal directives allow some loopholes I
    don't know.

    MattLB

    Hmmm.

    If I understand you, saturated fats cannot be made in
    trans fats. Soybean oil is 14% saturated fat, so I
    figure the other 86% is unsaturated fat. When you say
    that a fully hydrogenated fat or oil would have no trans
    fats because they have no unsaturated fat, you imply
    that our example, hydrogenated soybean oil has no
    transfats. However, if the soybean oil is 86%
    unsaturated fat, the result of hydrogenation should
    produce trans fats. No?

    Your first sentence seems to say that unsaturated fatty
    acids can go through the hydrogenation process without
    getting hydrogenated.

    That's true.

    Quoted message said:

    This seems self contradictory. Can a house go through
    the painting process without getting painted?

    If you don't have enough paint, yes.

    Quoted message said:

    Either I am seriously failing to understand you, or you
    are yanking my chain. The later would not be unusual on
    USENET.

    No chain yanking, I promise. A bit of background:
    Saturated fats have straight fatty acids, whereas
    unsaturated fats have kinked fatty acids. This leads to
    saturated fat being solid a room temperature, whereas
    unsaturated fat is liquid (oil). To make margarine, which
    is solid, requires converting some of the unsaturated
    (with hydrogen) oil to saturated fat. This is done by
    pumping hydrogen gas through the oil in the presence of a
    catalyst.

    The catalyst binds and distorts the unsaturated fatty
    acid making it vunerable to attack by the hydrogen. If
    the hydrogen attacks and binds the fatty acid it will no
    longer be unsaturated, it will have become saturated
    (with hydrogen). If there is enough hydrogen and the
    process is done for long enough you should end up with
    all the fatty acids fully hydrogenated (saturated). If
    the hydrogenation is only partial - just enough to make
    the oil more solid - not all of the unsaturated will be
    turned into saturated.

    If the unsaturated fatty acid is released from the catalyst
    without
    picking up any hydrogen it will spring back to its original
    shape, OR,
    it will spring back in a trans shape. The key thing is that
    this trans
    shape, while still unsaturated is straight instead of
    kinked. This means
    it appears to be a saturated fat and behaves like one
    physically, but as
    soon as the body tries to burn it like saturated fat it
    finds it can't.

    The result is that trans fats hang around in the body and
    are difficult to get rid of without free radicals. Any
    unsaturated fats + free radicals = damage to the body, so
    all in all trans fats are bad news.

    MattLB

    Matt,

    Another point, just to kind of add to an already thorough
    explanation is that trans-fats aren't just flat. They're
    rigid and flat and thus will increase the melting
    temperature of the fats that they pack with(much the way
    cholesterol increases the rigidity of cell membranes). Thus
    the reason why people believe that trans-fats are believed
    to increase the deposit of arterial plaque(high melting
    fatty gloop).

  15. MattLB <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Dave said:


    Quoted message said:

    Note that trans fatty acids are unsaturated fatty
    acids that have gone through the hydrogenation process
    without getting hydrogenated. Strictly speaking only
    "partially hydrogenated oils" should have trans fats.
    Fully hydrogenated fats/oils should have no trans fats
    as they have no unsaturated fat at all. Whether the
    food labelling legal directives allow some loopholes I
    don't know.

    MattLB


    Quoted message said:


    The catalyst binds and distorts the unsaturated fatty
    acid making it vunerable to attack by the hydrogen. If
    the hydrogen attacks and binds the fatty acid it will no
    longer be unsaturated, it will have become saturated
    (with hydrogen). If there is enough hydrogen and the
    process is done for long enough you should end up with
    all the fatty acids fully hydrogenated (saturated). If
    the hydrogenation is only partial - just enough to make
    the oil more solid - not all of the unsaturated will be
    turned into saturated.

    It begs the question why companies would expend money to
    convert unsaturated oil to saturated fat if there are
    natural saturated fats
    (e.g. coconut oil) that can be used. Full hydrogenation is
    an asymptotic limit which will never be reached in an
    industrial process constrained by time and money. So
    any hydrogenated oil will have some (small) percentage
    of trans fat.

    Quoted message said:

    If the unsaturated fatty acid is released from the catalyst
    without
    picking up any hydrogen it will spring back to its original
    shape, OR,
    it will spring back in a trans shape. The key thing is that
    this trans
    shape, while still unsaturated is straight instead of
    kinked. This means
    it appears to be a saturated fat and behaves like one
    physically, but as
    soon as the body tries to burn it like saturated fat it
    finds it can't.

    The result is that trans fats hang around in the body and
    are difficult to get rid of without free radicals. Any
    unsaturated fats + free radicals = damage to the body, so
    all in all trans fats are bad news.

    There is a hubris to the food industry where some engineer
    hacks together some "great idea" like hydrogenation with a
    very simple intent and no consideration of the complex
    effects that it has. Genetically modified crops also sit in
    this category of "innovation". For example, there are
    regions where soil aluminum content is too high to allow
    normal crops to grow so some genius decided that all we need
    is modified plants to solve this problem. The obvious fact
    that these crops will have abnormal aluminum content doesn't
    seem to be noticed.

  16. In sci.med.nutrition kvs said:

    It begs the question why companies would expend money to
    convert unsaturated oil to saturated fat if there are
    natural saturated fats
    (e.g. coconut oil) that can be used.

    Because saturated fats are regarded by many as "bad", and
    trans-fats being mono or poly are therefore "good" by
    default. It took awhile for the adverse health effects of
    trans-fats to become known.

    --
    Cliff Stamp [email hidden]
    physics.mun.ca~sstamp

    The one unforgivable sin, the offence against one's own
    integrity, is to accept anything at all simply on authority
    -- Maureen Johnson Long

    Anyone can hold the helm when the sea is calm. --
    Publilius Syrus

  17. Quoted message said:


    In sci.med.nutrition kvs said:

    It begs the question why companies would expend money to
    convert unsaturated oil to saturated fat if there are
    natural saturated fats
    (e.g. coconut oil) that can be used.

    Because saturated fats are regarded by many as "bad", and
    trans-fats being mono or poly are therefore "good" by
    default. It took awhile for the adverse health effects of
    trans-fats to become known.

    Also, because it allows you to fine tune the consistency of
    the the result. Depending on how long you hydrogenate for
    you either get a slightly less runny oil, a gloopy oil, a
    greasy paste or a solid fat. Apparently, pure saturated fat
    is far too solid to spread on bread, so margarines always
    stop short of full hydrogenation. They can also claim their
    margarine contain "healthy" unsaturated fats that way too.

    MattLB

  18. In sci.med.nutrition MattLB said:

    Also, because it allows you to fine tune the consistency
    of the the result.

    You could also get this by altering the amount of the
    saturated fat, taste may be an issue here, though they could
    always use the same thing as they do for the highly
    processed PUFA.

    Expense could also be an issue, as the oils typically used
    for margerines are the cheapest ones, so even if the
    processing is more involved, the low base costs might keep
    totals down.

    --
    Cliff Stamp [email hidden]
    physics.mun.ca~sstamp

    The one unforgivable sin, the offence against one's own
    integrity, is to accept anything at all simply on authority
    -- Maureen Johnson Long

    Anyone can hold the helm when the sea is calm. --
    Publilius Syrus

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.