Cycling Training · Public discussion

Weight Training

Started by enamore22 · · Last activity · 44 posts · 6,413 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Training
Published
21 June 2004
Last activity
12 March 2005
Original author
enamore22
Posts
44
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
6,413
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 41–44 of 44
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. [QUOTE]Originally posted by steve007
    [B]Forces when hill climbing will vary. There are those who get out of the saddle, those who do high cadence (easy gear), those who do low cadence (hard gear), so forces will surely vary with individual, style and gradient. But Ric is right about only low to moderate forces being present during climbing.
    [/quote]

    the forces do vary. i was demonstrating the forces required at the upper echelon of the sport, and therefore, how little force is required to exceed at the sport.



    Quoted post said:


    However I do think weight training is beneficial, if you follow a plan and keep weight low/moderate and do high reps.



    this sort of weight training, will not generally cause hypertrophy. the gains made here are generally only neuromuscular in nature, and only occur at the joint angle and velocity at which they're trained. thus, this typeof weight training will only help the weight training exercises that you do.


    Quoted post said:


    One of the reasons i weight train is because of the extreme amount of weight/mass i lose during the summer months, but there are many non-performance (although it will affect overall ability) related reasons to weight train.



    there are possibly, many reasons to weight train, none of which i have agrued against. for e.g., some people say that they "look better" when they have greater muscle mass, and that of course would be highly/entirely dependent on the person concerned.

    if you're loosing muscle, where is it coming from and/or is it needed for cycle racing? do you cycle race or do you ride for fun/health reasons?

    Quoted post said:


    Although Ric is right that its VO2 and LT which govern performance. Weight training wont improve this. [/B]



    weights just don't help endurance cycling performance in trained riders!

    ric

  2. Wow! So were in agreement then!

  3. I think the current belief that cycling will lead to calcium deficit may be a lot of hype. I'm prepared to accept problems could arise if the cycle training is extreme with insufficient rest days and endless hours in the saddle. But basically I fail to see how cycling doesn't bone load since many muscles are being used on a bike. The hips and thigh muscles have to drive against varied resistance while the arms still have to pull hard on the bars when climbing. O.K. the back is neglected during riding and some basic hyperextensions or good-mornings should be done to compensate.

    Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by jagrazor
    that is another debate completely though.. so lets not start 😉

    maybe it doesnt effect bone density noticably or at all 🙂

  4. oneradtec said:

    hee heee heee I wonder why Lemond didn't do weights and won the tour three times without drugs?


    Apparently "without drugs"?!🙄
    Paulo

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.