UK and Europe · Public discussion

Goretex Shoes

Started by John Barry · · Last activity · 15 posts · 1,017 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
21 June 2004
Last activity
24 June 2004
Original author
John Barry
Posts
15
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,017
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–15 of 15
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. After getting saturated on a charity ride yesterday, it
    occurred to me to ask why nobody seems to make Goretex
    cycling shoes. After all, plenty of lightweight Goretex-
    lined walking boots are available and they do a good job.
    Surely a cycling equivalent would be better than overshoes
    and other things?

  2. John Barry said:

    After getting saturated on a charity ride yesterday, it
    occurred to me to ask why nobody seems to make Goretex
    cycling shoes. After all, plenty of lightweight Goretex-
    lined walking boots are available and they do a good job.

    Your definition of "good job" is my definition of bleedin'
    'orrible sweatboxes I much prefer to avoid...

    Quoted message said:

    Surely a cycling equivalent would be better than
    overshoes and other things?

    Thing about overshoes is you can take them off when you
    don't want your feet boiled alive. Many cycling shoes are
    designed with ventilation quite high on the feature list,
    and you throw that straight out the window if you put a
    goretex liner in.

    Also the case that it won't stop the water that goes in
    through the holes, and without the holes you won't get your
    feet inside! So if you get water draining down your legs
    (which you probably will unless you're in full overtrousers
    going over the top of an extended cuff or you're wearing
    gaiters) then you'll still get wet feet, /and/ they'll take
    much longer to dry thanks to your miracle membrane. I've
    never been convinced that sewing goretex into footwear
    represents a good piece of design, to be honest. You're
    stuck with it unless you carry spare shoes, and if it holes
    then you have all the disadvantages of a sweaty membrane
    coupled with them leaking anyway. There's a good reason why
    cyclists don't ride in Goretex 100% of the time and that's
    because it's less comfortable than alternatives if it isn't
    sheeting it down. I don't see that shoes are any different,
    but they don't pack up into a pocket so well.

    For a wet summer ride I much prefer Shimano SD-60
    cycling sandals. Your feet get wet straight away, but it
    doesn't matter much and they dry straight out as soon as
    the rain stops.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111
    ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382
    640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net
    [email hidden] dundee.ac.uk~pjclinch

  3. John Barry <[email hidden]> wrote:
    : After getting saturated on a charity ride yesterday, it
    : occurred to me to ask why nobody seems to make Goretex
    : cycling shoes. After all, plenty of lightweight Goretex-
    : lined walking boots are available and they do a good job.
    : Surely a cycling equivalent would be better than overshoes
    : and other things?

    Shimano W101 winter boots are pretty much waterproof.

    In spring/summer/autumn, goretex is too hot for cycling.

    --
    Arthur Clune clune.orgclune.org "Technolibertarians make a
    philosophy out of a personality defect"
    - Paulina Borsook

  4. John Barry said:

    After getting saturated on a charity ride yesterday, it
    occurred to me to ask why nobody seems to make Goretex
    cycling shoes.

    Because feet dry quicker and SPD sandals already exist? Just
    guessing...

    --
    Guy
    --
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after
    posting. chapmancentral.co.ukchapmancentral.co.uk

  5. Noooooo!

    I bought a pair once. One developed the tiniest hole, and
    by the time I got to work my left foot was immersed in a
    bag of water.

    IMHO Overshoes are a much better idea, though they're a
    bugger to get on.

    TB

    John Barry said:

    After getting saturated on a charity ride yesterday, it
    occurred to me to ask why nobody seems to make Goretex
    cycling shoes. After all, plenty of lightweight Goretex-
    lined walking boots are available and they do a good job.
    Surely a cycling equivalent would be better than overshoes
    and other things?

  6. [email hidden] schreef ...

    Quoted message said:

    Noooooo!

    I bought a pair once. One developed the tiniest hole, and
    by the time I got to work my left foot was immersed in a
    bag of water.

    IMHO Overshoes are a much better idea, though they're a
    bugger to get on.

    Try Vaude's (if you can get hold of them in the UK). They're
    really easy to slip on. BTW: these are not neoprene
    overshoes, but made from the same material as raintrouser,
    only thicker.

    --
    Regards, Marten

  7. tom bender said:

    Noooooo!

    I bought a pair once. One developed the tiniest hole, and
    by the time I got to work my left foot was immersed in a
    bag of water.

    IMHO Overshoes are a much better idea, though they're a
    bugger to get on.

    TB

    John Barry said:

    After getting saturated on a charity ride yesterday, it
    occurred to me to ask why nobody seems to make Goretex
    cycling shoes. After all, plenty of lightweight Goretex-
    lined walking boots are available and they do a good job.
    Surely a cycling equivalent would be better than
    overshoes and other things?

    SPD sandals are much better - no problems at all. Feet dry
    out in minutes.

    --

    J u l i a n

    __o
    _`\(,_
    (_)/ (_)

  8. Julian Symondson <[email hidden]> wrote:

    : SPD sandals are much better - no problems at all. Feet dry
    : out in minutes.

    They would be, except that you have to wear socks with them
    in all but the hotest of days. This is a very, very, very
    bad thing.

    --
    Arthur Clune clune.orgclune.org "Technolibertarians make a
    philosophy out of a personality defect"
    - Paulina Borsook

  9. Arthur Clune said:
    Julian Symondson said:

    SPD sandals are much better - no problems at all. Feet
    dry out in minutes.

    They would be, except that you have to wear socks with
    them in all but the hotest of days. This is a very, very,
    very bad thing.

    Not for long it won't be. I gather his Beckhamship was
    spotted wearing socks and sandals in Portugal so expect it
    to become the pinnacle of fashion very shortly.

    Tony ;-)

  10. Tony Raven <[email hidden]> wrote:

    : Not for long it won't be. I gather his Beckhamship was
    : spotted wearing socks and sandals in Portugal so expect it
    : to become the pinnacle of fashion very shortly.

    I doubt even Becks can overcome the sheer horror of socks
    and sandals. At least, I hope so.

    --
    Arthur Clune clune.orgclune.org "Technolibertarians make a
    philosophy out of a personality defect"
    - Paulina Borsook

  11. "Arthur Clune" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Tony Raven <[email hidden]> wrote:

    : Not for long it won't be. I gather his Beckhamship was
    : spotted wearing


    socks

    Quoted message said:

    : and sandals in Portugal so expect it to become the
    : pinnacle of fashion very shortly.

    I doubt even Becks can overcome the sheer horror of socks
    and sandals. At


    least,

    Quoted message said:

    I hope so.

    Careful Arthur. Take on the role of fashion police and
    you'll end up as Fabrizio Mazzoleni...:-)
    --
    Mark South: World Citizen, Net Denizen

  12. Arthur Clune said:

    They would be, except that you have to wear socks with
    them in all but the hotest of days. This is a very, very,
    very bad thing.

    I use mine more than my Rockhoppers, and the only socks
    that have ever "graced" them are Sealskinz or Porelles on
    rare occasions (pop them in the pannier in case it gets
    too cold).

    But by working at acclimatising your feet over time they
    get quite a bit hardier. If socks and shoes are only used
    when they need to be, rather than by default (this on day
    to day basis, not just on the bike), feet get quite a bit
    hardier and the sandals (with no socks) work over a much
    longer range. Useful results include less smelly, much
    tougher feet which hurt less when they /do/ get cold, and
    greater relative effect from things like overshoes come the
    real winter.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111
    ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382
    640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net
    [email hidden] dundee.ac.uk~pjclinch

  13. Quoted message said:

    John Barry <[email hidden]> wrote:
    : After getting saturated on a charity ride yesterday, it
    : occurred to me to ask why nobody seems to make Goretex
    : cycling shoes. After all, plenty of lightweight Goretex-
    : lined walking boots are available and they do a good
    : job. Surely a cycling equivalent would be better than
    : overshoes and other things?

    Shimano W101 winter boots are pretty much waterproof.

    In spring/summer/autumn, goretex is too hot for cycling.

    /me looks out of window at blustering wind, gusts up to
    45mph, and the driving rain.

    Apparently, you know, it's summer right now. I just three
    hours with almost my full winter kit on 🙁 the only thing
    missing was the endura waterproof overtrousers (just too
    chunky to ride energetically).

    --
    Callas

  14. John Barry said:

    After getting saturated on a charity ride yesterday, it
    occurred to me to ask why nobody seems to make Goretex
    cycling shoes. After all, plenty of lightweight Goretex-
    lined walking boots are available and they do a good job.
    Surely a cycling equivalent would be better than overshoes
    and other things?

    They do make gore-tex socks. You could wear these in your
    regular shoes. Or you could wear gaiters outside your shoes.

    AC

  15. anonymous coward:

    Quoted message said:

    They do make gore-tex socks. You could wear these in
    your regular shoes. Or you could wear gaiters outside
    your shoes.

    I have been known to wear Goretex hiking socks when out on
    my bike, but only if it's *very* cold and only because I
    don't own a set of neoprene overshoes (that is something
    that will be rectified before the next winter - or sooner if
    this weather keeps up).

    d.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.