General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

USA Today

Started by Kyrodoc · · Last activity · 4 posts · 533 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
19 June 2004
Last activity
19 June 2004
Original author
Kyrodoc
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
533
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Did you read the front page of USA today?

    Dr.'s refusing to treat the employees of plantiff law firms?

    Firing employees whose spouses work at plantiff law firms?
    Refusing to testify on behalf of injured patients....

    Is that ethical?

  2. "KyroDoc" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Did you read the front page of USA today?

    Dr.'s refusing to treat the employees of plantiff law
    firms?

    Docs have the right to choose who to see. If they fear a
    lawsuit from their patients, they won't be effective docs.

    Quoted message said:

    Firing employees whose spouses work at plantiff law firms?

    Unethical. I think there is a definite lawsuit here.

    Quoted message said:

    Refusing to testify on behalf of injured patients....

    Is that ethical?

    Yeah. I don't recall testifying so someone can rip other
    people off and raise libability insurance rates is a
    requirement of medicine.

    Jeff

  3. Quoted message said:

    From: "Jeff"

    Docs have the right to choose who to see. If they fear a
    lawsuit from their patients, they won't be effective docs.

    Why should a doctor fear a law suit from an attorney more
    than the average Joe?

    If the attorney-patient decided to sue for malpractice he
    wouldnt represent himself anyway. (The man who represents
    himself has a fool for a client)

    I'm, afraid "fear" isn't the issue Jeffe.

    These "doctors"...(the same ones who took a hippocratic
    oath) are trying to make a point by rattling their scalpels
    thus bringing public attention to their cause.

    Quoted message said:

    Yeah. I don't recall testifying so someone can rip other
    people off and raise libability insurance rates is a
    requirement of medicine.

    So people who are legitimately injured are rip off artists
    that don't deserve expert testmony?

    Expert testimony is not within the scope of medical
    practice?

  4. Quoted message said:

    From: [email hidden] (KyroDoc)

    Quoted message said:

    Why should a doctor fear a law suit from an attorney more
    than the average Joe?

    The question stands.

    Albeit I believe any response short of "These doctors are
    trying to make a point to bring attention to the cause"
    would be disingenuous.

    Personally I believe the best way to curb malpractice rates
    is to strip the licenses from the worst offenders.

    Case in point there is a local physician who rx'd
    app. 10,000 Oxycontin tabs in a four year period. He
    was busted. Then he was busted for trading Rx's

    He has been prosecuted for molesting patients
    and paid a hefty fine for that.... yet he
    continues practicing with the blessing of our
    state medical board.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.