Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Chain Maintenance

Started by angotja · · Last activity · 46 posts · 3,019 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
7 June 2004
Last activity
20 June 2004
Original author
angotja
Posts
46
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,019
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 46
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Ideas & Best Results for getting hi performance out of your chain...

  2. anagotja-<< Ideas & Best Results for getting hi performance
    out of your chain... >><BR><BR>

    Keep it and the cogs, rings, pulleys clean. Connect the
    chain with a snap link, take all above off regularly to
    clean, lube, ride the next day.

    Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St.
    Boulder, CO, 80302
    (303)440-3535 vecchios.comvecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali
    costruite eccezionalmente bene"

  3. On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 07:30:07 GMT, angotja

    may have said:

    Ideas & Best Results for getting hi performance out of
    your chain...

    Performance is in the rider, not the chain.

    Did you mean to ask about durability? Then follow the
    manufacturer's recommendations.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via
    e-mail. Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature. Words
    processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  4. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Werehatrack
    On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 07:30:07 GMT, angotja
    <[email hidden]> may have said:

    Performance is in the rider, not the chain.

    Did you mean to ask about durability? Then follow the
    manufacturer's recommendations.

    W/respect, of course I mean durability (I wasn't aware that 'performance' had such a specific connotation). I know there are a couple of schools of thought on this issue, and I thought it might be interesting/beneficial to see a discussion on this subject.

    I generally just wipe it clean and re-lube. If it is heavily soiled, I will use a solvent and some q-tips to clean it up as best I can, then re-lube & ride. I lube on a weekly/75 mi schedule, and clean as needed.

    I am interested to learn the techniques of others...

  5. If you're riding a 9 speed rear end, I WOULD NOT be removing
    that chain unless you put a high strength replacement pin in
    to replace the one you removed. Existing pins have a peaned
    end and removing and replacing will weaken the end of the
    pin and may cause you to break the chain. I speak from
    experience. By using a thinner or petrol solvent bath, you
    are washing away all the existing internal lubricant from
    the chain rollers and can cause rust to start and thusly
    also weakening the chain..

    Just go to Academy Sports or Nashbar and get a Finish Line
    chain cleaner gizmo ($20). Their bio cleaner works well
    without completely stripping the chain. You don't need to
    be cleaning it that much!!! Then generously recoat the
    chain with chain lube, wipe excess off, clean and oil the
    jockey wheels and you're done!! Shouldn't take more than
    10 minutes.

    Chris 2200 Trek

  6. On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 11:47:30 GMT, angotja

    may have said:

    I generally just wipe it clean and re-lube. If it is
    heavily soiled, I will use a solvent and some q-tips to
    clean it up as best I can, then re-lube & ride. I lube on a
    weekly/75 mi schedule, and clean as needed.

    I am interested to learn the techniques of others...

    As noted in another thread just a few topics above this one
    (and in countless others over the years), chain lube rituals
    are as varied as the people performing them. Results seem to
    be just as varied. The recommendation from SRAM for their
    chains is a wipe/relube regimen using no solvents or
    degreasers. Shimano's recommendations for their 9-speed HG53
    chain only advise that detergents used must be neutral;
    Shimano sells a chain lube product, which SRAM does not.
    Campy recommends that chains be cleaned on the bike using a
    brush or cloth saturated with a suitable detergent or
    degreaser prior to relubrication with their chain lube
    product. I don't know what KMC recommends. From what I can
    see, though, none of the chain makers advise removal of the
    chain for cleaning. There is a school of thought which holds
    that the makers are providing only a minimum and not an
    absolute spec in their recommendations, but as with
    everything else about chain lubrication, opinions vary.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via
    e-mail. Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature. Words
    processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  7. Which is your school of thought?

  8. angotja said:

    Which is your school of thought?

    Our Lady of Perpetual Amazement.

    Bill "at certain posters, that is" S.

  9. Chris H said:

    If you're riding a 9 speed rear end, I WOULD NOT be
    removing that chain unless you put a high strength
    replacement pin in to replace the one you removed.

    Either that, or get a master link from Craig, SRAM, or KMC.
    The KMC one is like $2.50 -- well worth it. You won't have
    to deal with this issue again.

    Quoted message said:

    Existing pins have a peaned end and removing and replacing
    will weaken the end of the pin and may cause you to break
    the chain. I speak from experience.

    Yup. You could go for months or years with no problems, but
    then one day...

    Quoted message said:

    By using a thinner or petrol solvent bath, you are washing
    away all the existing internal lubricant from the chain
    rollers and can cause rust to start and thusly also
    weakening the chain..

    You can't wash away the dirt without washing away the lube.
    But that's why you relube.

    Quoted message said:

    Just go to Academy Sports or Nashbar and get a Finish Line
    chain cleaner gizmo ($20). Their bio cleaner works well
    without completely stripping the chain. You don't need to
    be cleaning it that much!!!

    Chain cleaners work fine, but take a long time to do a good
    job. You really have to keep changing the fluid until it
    runs clear -- otherwise you're not doing any good. This
    takes many fluid changes, and a lot of time, and it's a
    pain. Also, if you're using bio degreaser, make sure you
    wash it all off with water afterward.

    BTDT.

    Chain cleaners are an OK idea, but they really need a much
    larger fluid reservior. As yet, no one has marketed a really
    good design.

    Quoted message said:

    Then generously recoat the chain with chain lube, wipe
    excess off, clean and oil the jockey wheels and you're
    done!! Shouldn't take more than 10 minutes.

    It shouldn't take that long, total.

    My method, these days:

    Use parts cleaner can, available in any auto parts store,
    for under $10. This is like a large paint can, filled with
    solvent, with a parts washer basket inside.

    When cleaning the bike, first remove the chain and drop it
    in the parts cleaner. Swish it around in the fluid with a
    big screwdriver. Proceed to clean the rest of the bike.
    Every so often, give the chain another swish, and lift the
    basket to let the fluid and dirt drain away. Continue
    cleaning the bike. When you're done, remove the chain from
    the parts cleaner, rinse it out with water, and put it back
    on the bike. Relube when it's dry. Total time spent handling
    the chain -- about 2 minutes. The dirt, oil, and cleaning
    fluid remains in the can, which can be reused for years,
    without polluting anything.

    Again, the best method is probably an ultrasonic parts
    cleaner. I've seen suitable ones selling on eBay for under
    $100 -- well worth it for a lifetime cyclist. It would pay
    for itself in 2-3 years.

    Matt O.

  10. Werehatrack said:

    On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 11:47:30 GMT, angotja <usenet-

    may have said:

    I generally just wipe it clean and re-lube. If it is
    heavily soiled, I will use a solvent and some q-tips to
    clean it up as best I can, then re-lube & ride. I lube on
    a weekly/75 mi schedule, and clean as needed.

    I am interested to learn the techniques of others...

    As noted in another thread just a few topics above this
    one (and in countless others over the years), chain lube
    rituals are as varied as the people performing them.
    Results seem to be just as varied. The recommendation from
    SRAM for their chains is a wipe/relube regimen using no
    solvents or degreasers. Shimano's recommendations for
    their 9-speed HG53 chain only advise that detergents used
    must be neutral; Shimano sells a chain lube product, which
    SRAM does not. Campy recommends that chains be cleaned on
    the bike using a brush or cloth saturated with a suitable
    detergent or degreaser prior to relubrication with their
    chain lube product. I don't know what KMC recommends. From
    what I can see, though, none of the chain makers advise
    removal of the chain for cleaning. There is a school of
    thought which holds that the makers are providing only a
    minimum and not an absolute spec in their recommendations,
    but as with everything else about chain lubrication,
    opinions vary.

    Forget all this "schools of thought" [censored]. This is basic
    mechanics and mechanical practice. There is no mystical
    knowledge to be had from chain manufacturers, who, remember,
    are in the business of selling chains (at an overpriced
    rate, too).

    Matt O.

  11. Matt O'Toole said:

    Again, the best method [of cleaning a chain] is probably
    an ultrasonic parts cleaner.

    I can't argue with that.

    Quoted message said:

    I've seen suitable ones selling on eBay for under $100 --
    well worth it for a lifetime cyclist. It would pay for
    itself in 2-3 years.

    How do you figure? What costs will be saved by using a
    chain cleaner?

    I like to spend $$$ on tools as much as the next tech-nerd.
    And I think an ultrasonic cleaner would be handy on many
    occaions. But I can't see the justification for an
    ultrasonic cleaner.

    --
    Dave dvt at psu dot edu

  12. dvt said:

    Matt O'Toole wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Again, the best method [of cleaning a chain] is probably
    an ultrasonic parts
    cleaner.

    I can't argue with that.

    Quoted message said:

    I've seen
    suitable ones selling on eBay for under $100 -- well
    worth it for a lifetime cyclist. It would pay for itself
    in 2-3 years.

    How do you figure? What costs will be saved by using a
    chain cleaner?

    I like to spend $$$ on tools as much as the next tech-
    nerd. And I think an ultrasonic cleaner would be handy on
    many occaions. But I can't see the justification for an
    ultrasonic cleaner.

    Well, if you go through 3-4 $20 chains a year like I do --
    you can cut this chain consumption by 2/3, in addition to
    the convenience and time savings. You can also use it for
    other stuff, and share with your bike-riding neighbors.

    Matt O.

  13. I'd like a ultrasonic cleaner but my 15,000 mile (~3 years)
    per 240-link chain hardly justifies it then.

    "Matt O'Toole" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:2ip6drFpq9hdU1@uni-
    berlin.de...
    | dvt wrote:
    |
    | >|
    | Well, if you go through 3-4 $20 chains a year like I do --
    | you can cut
    this
    | chain consumption by 2/3, in addition to the convenience
    | and time savings.
    You
    | can also use it for other stuff, and share with your
    | bike-riding
    neighbors.
    |
    | Matt O.
    |
    |

  14. Doug Huffman said:

    I'd like a ultrasonic cleaner but my 15,000 mile (~3
    years) per 240-link chain hardly justifies it then.

    If you're getting that kind of mileage, you're definately
    doing something right!

    Matt O.

  15. In article <[email hidden]>, angotja

    Quoted message said:

    Ideas & Best Results for getting hi performance out of
    your chain..

    I posted the results of cleaning two halves ot the same
    chain with the two main methods (completely cleaning out by
    trashing the chain in solvent for one and a careful wiping
    of the outside of the chain with a rag with WC-40 and then
    with a dry tooth brush for the other) and then by
    lubricating both in exactly the same way. I measured the
    chain halves after cleaning and kept doing it until one of
    them hit 1/16 elongation. The chain half that was solvent
    thrashed reached 1/16 before the other half. I still have my
    original post if you wish to see it.

    My best guess for why is that there is lubrication that
    remains deep within the chain when one doesn't "solvent
    thrash" the chain.

    I quit "solvent thrashing" my chains.

    Want to buy some used paint thinner?

    Tom Gibb <[email hidden]

  16. On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 06:30:37 GMT, angotja

    may have said:

    Which is your school of thought?

    Why waste time contemplating the inscrutable when you've got
    clear, unambiguous information from the people who made the
    item? If it's not broke, don't fix it; if the manufacturer's
    instructions didn't work for me, I'd have to figure out
    something else. That's not the case, so I don't.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via
    e-mail. Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature. Words
    processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  17. On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 12:02:41 -0400, "Matt O'Toole" <[email hidden]>

    may have said:

    Forget all this "schools of thought" [censored]. This is basic
    mechanics and mechanical practice. There is no mystical
    knowledge to be had from chain manufacturers, who,
    remember, are in the business of selling chains (at an
    overpriced rate, too).

    And the people who sell expensive chain lubes and cleaning
    widgets have no interest in increasing the amount of
    effort and expense invested in a task that ordinarily is
    quick and cheap if the instructions of the item's
    manufacturer are followed?

    Everyone in the supply side can be accused of distortion
    in furtherance of a vested interest, but chasing that
    chimera merely for the sake of paranoia is a fool's errand
    in my opinion.

    --
    My email address is antispammed; pull WEEDS if replying via
    e-mail. Typoes are not a bug, they're a feature. Words
    processed in a facility that contains nuts.

  18. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    If you're riding a 9 speed rear end, I WOULD NOT be
    removing that chain unless you put a high strength
    replacement pin in to replace the one you removed. Existing
    pins have a peaned end and removing and replacing will
    weaken the end of the pin and may cause you to break the
    chain. I speak from experience.

    Many chains now come with a quick disconnect link that makes
    it very easy to take your chain off to clean it.

    Quoted message said:

    By using a thinner or petrol solvent bath, you are washing
    away all the existing internal lubricant from the chain
    rollers and can cause rust to start and thusly also
    weakening the chain..

    I've never had this problem. I rotate through two chains and
    at times one chain will sit solvent for a month with no ill
    effects. No rust ever.

    Quoted message said:

    Just go to Academy Sports or Nashbar and get a Finish Line
    chain cleaner gizmo ($20). Their bio cleaner works well
    without completely stripping the chain. You don't need to
    be cleaning it that much!!! Then generously recoat the
    chain with chain lube, wipe excess off, clean and oil the
    jockey wheels and you're done!! Shouldn't take more than
    10 minutes.

    These devices do an ok job at cleaning the outside of the
    chain. You want to clean the inside of the chain. That is
    where all the wear occurs. The outside of the chain is
    really unimporant. It only matters if you want to keep your
    clothes/leg clean.
    ----------------
    Alex

  19. [email hidden] (TBGibb) wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
    --

    Quoted message said:

    My best guess for why is that there is lubrication that remains deep within the


    chain when one doesn't "solvent thrash" the chain.

    Quoted message said:


    --
    Tom Gibb <[email hidden]>

    Right-O, solvent stay inna chain and further lube is trashed.

    But what the heck, some folks boil their gunky guitar strings too...

    ST

  20. On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:24:47 -0400, Alex Rodriguez <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    If you're riding a 9 speed rear end, I WOULD NOT be
    removing that chain unless you put a high strength
    replacement pin in to replace the one you removed.
    Existing pins have a peaned end and removing and replacing
    will weaken the end of the pin and may cause you to break
    the chain. I speak from experience.


    As someone who unwittingly removed a fairly new Campag C9
    chain from his road bike to clean it and then simply
    replaced it using the existing pin I was concerned to read
    this warning. I took my bike to my LBS quite prepared to
    replace the chain but, after subjecting the drive train to
    some stress, his view was that the chain was safe to use and
    no replacement was necessary. I'd be interested in any
    comments on that opinion.What is the risk of this chain
    breaking under normal riding conditions? While I'm not keen
    to test my teeth against my handlebars or the road, where I
    live, chains, and Campag in particular, are relatively
    expensive items to buy

    Thanks

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.