General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Caffeine

Started by Alan · · Last activity · 7 posts · 525 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
30 May 2004
Last activity
30 May 2004
Original author
Alan
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
525
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In browsing through the abstracts of the 63rd ADA Scientific
    sessions, I came across this one.

    "Abstract Title Coffee Consumption and Risk of Type 2
    Diabetes in Men and Women

    Abstract Information Presented during: Emerging Research in
    Clinical Nutrition -
    06/17/2003 (08:00 - 10:00 AM) Abstract Number: 307-OR
    Authors: EDUARDO SALAZAR-MARTINEZ, WALTER WILLETT,
    ALBERTO ASCHERIO, MICHAEL LEITZMANN, JOANN MANSON,
    FRANK B. HU Institution: Boston, MA Results: In small
    short-term studies, acute administration of caffeine
    decreases insulin sensitivity and impairs glucose
    tolerance. Because tolerance to the humoral and
    hemodynamic effects of caffeine typically develops
    with chronic use, it is difficult to extrapolate
    findings from short-term studies to chronic use of
    coffee and other caffeinated beverages. We followed
    42,888 men from 1986 to 1998 and 85,056 women from
    1980 to 1998; these participants were free of
    diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular disease at
    baseline. Coffee consumption was assessed every 2-4
    years through validated questionnaires. We documented
    1,333 new cases of type 2 diabetes in men during 12
    years of follow-up and 4,085 new cases of type 2
    diabetes in women during 18 years of follow-up. We
    found an inverse association between coffee intake and
    type 2 diabetes after adjustment for age, body mass
    index, smoking, and others diabetes risk factors in
    both men and women. In men, the multivariate relative
    risks of diabetes according to coffee consumption
    categories (0, <1, 1-3, 4-5, [ge]6 cups/day) were
    1.00, 0.98, 0.93, .71, 0.46 (95%CI 0.26-0.82; P for
    trend=0.002), and the corresponding RRs were 1.00,
    1.16, 0.99, 0.70, 0.71 (95%CI 0.56-0.89; P for
    trend<0.0001) in women. Total caffeine intake from
    coffee and other sources was associated with a
    significantly lower risk of diabetes in both men and
    women (Multivariate RRs comparing extreme quintiles of
    caffeine intake were 0.78 (95% CI 0.65-0.95, p for
    trend=0.003) for men and 0.70 (95% CI 0.63-0.79, p for
    trend < 0.0001) for women).

    These data suggest that long-term coffee consumption is
    associated with a significantly lower risk of type 2
    diabetes in both men and women. Category: Nutrition"

    Back to my java :-)

    Maybe I should have drunk more of it when I was younger; but
    I suspect I'd still be here.

    Cheers, Alan, T2 d&e, Australia. Remove weight and
    carbs to email.
    --
    Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

  2. YAY!!!!

    c

    "Alan" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In browsing through the abstracts of the 63rd ADA
    Scientific sessions, I came across this one.

    "Abstract Title Coffee Consumption and Risk of Type 2
    Diabetes in Men and Women

    Abstract Information Presented during: Emerging Research
    in Clinical Nutrition -
    06/17/2003 (08:00 - 10:00 AM) Abstract Number: 307-OR
    Authors: EDUARDO SALAZAR-MARTINEZ, WALTER WILLETT,
    ALBERTO ASCHERIO, MICHAEL LEITZMANN, JOANN MANSON,
    FRANK B. HU Institution: Boston, MA Results: In
    small short-term studies, acute administration of
    caffeine decreases insulin sensitivity and impairs
    glucose tolerance. Because tolerance to the humoral
    and hemodynamic effects of caffeine typically
    develops with chronic use, it is difficult to
    extrapolate findings from short-term studies to
    chronic use of coffee and other caffeinated
    beverages. We followed 42,888 men from 1986 to 1998
    and 85,056 women from 1980 to 1998; these
    participants were free of diabetes, cancer, and
    cardiovascular disease at baseline. Coffee
    consumption was assessed every 2-4 years through
    validated questionnaires. We documented 1,333 new
    cases of type 2 diabetes in men during 12 years of
    follow-up and 4,085 new cases of type 2 diabetes in
    women during 18 years of follow-up. We found an
    inverse association between coffee intake and type 2
    diabetes after adjustment for age, body mass index,
    smoking, and others diabetes risk factors in both
    men and women. In men, the multivariate relative
    risks of diabetes according to coffee consumption
    categories (0, <1, 1-3, 4-5, [ge]6 cups/day) were
    1.00, 0.98, 0.93, .71, 0.46 (95%CI 0.26-0.82; P for
    trend=0.002), and the corresponding RRs were 1.00,
    1.16, 0.99, 0.70, 0.71 (95%CI 0.56-0.89; P for
    trend<0.0001) in women. Total caffeine intake from
    coffee and other sources was associated with a
    significantly lower risk of diabetes in both men and
    women (Multivariate RRs comparing extreme quintiles
    of caffeine intake were 0.78 (95% CI 0.65-0.95, p
    for trend=0.003) for men and 0.70 (95% CI 0.63-0.79,
    p for trend < 0.0001) for women).

    These data suggest that long-term coffee consumption is
    associated with a significantly lower risk of type 2
    diabetes in both men and women. Category: Nutrition"

    Back to my java :-)

    Maybe I should have drunk more of it when I was younger;
    but I suspect I'd still be here.

    Cheers, Alan, T2 d&e, Australia. Remove weight and carbs
    to email.
    --
    Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Alan said:

    In browsing through the abstracts of the 63rd ADA
    Scientific sessions, I came across this one.

    Because of the length, I am top posting.

    According to the data, there does not seem to be much of an
    effect until the 4-5 cups/day level is reached. It is
    practical significance, not statistical significance, which
    needs to be looked at.

    Also, are you sure that ALL the diabetes risk factors were
    taken into account? I can think of several more. In fact,
    there is even one potential argument which would invalidate
    the study completely, and there is no way it can be ruled
    out. That is that caffeine use could increase the early
    onset of type 2 diabetes, which would exclude from the
    study those who were most sensitive to the effects of
    caffeine already.

    This is always a problem in studies of this type; there can
    be one or more confounding factors. That is one reason why
    much is done with experimental animals; one can control
    most of what they are doing from birth. Even there,
    problems arise.

    Now I am a statistician; if I can think of several factors
    that might be ignored, I would expect medical researchers to
    think of far more. It may be that they do not know how to
    analyze the data if that is collected, and it might be that
    nobody can do a good job, but some of us can do fair jobs
    with the full models available. Even when we cannot, we
    might be able to suggest the way to do further
    experimentation.

    Quoted message said:

    "Abstract Title Coffee Consumption and Risk of Type 2
    Diabetes in Men and Women

    Quoted message said:

    Abstract Information Presented during: Emerging Research in
    Clinical Nutrition -
    06/17/2003 (08:00 - 10:00 AM) Abstract Number: 307-OR
    Authors: EDUARDO SALAZAR-MARTINEZ, WALTER WILLETT,
    ALBERTO ASCHERIO, MICHAEL LEITZMANN, JOANN MANSON,
    FRANK B. HU Institution: Boston, MA Results: In small
    short-term studies, acute administration of caffeine
    decreases insulin sensitivity and impairs glucose
    tolerance. Because tolerance to the humoral and
    hemodynamic effects of caffeine typically develops
    with chronic use, it is difficult to extrapolate
    findings from short-term studies to chronic use of
    coffee and other caffeinated beverages. We followed
    42,888 men from 1986 to 1998 and 85,056 women from
    1980 to 1998; these participants were free of
    diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular disease at
    baseline. Coffee consumption was assessed every 2-4
    years through validated questionnaires. We documented
    1,333 new cases of type 2 diabetes in men during 12
    years of follow-up and 4,085 new cases of type 2
    diabetes in women during 18 years of follow-up. We
    found an inverse association between coffee intake
    and type 2 diabetes after adjustment for age, body
    mass index, smoking, and others diabetes risk factors
    in both men and women. In men, the multivariate
    relative risks of diabetes according to coffee
    consumption categories (0, <1, 1-3, 4-5, [ge]6
    cups/day) were 1.00, 0.98, 0.93, .71, 0.46 (95%CI 0.26-
    0.82; P for trend=0.002), and the corresponding RRs
    were 1.00, 1.16, 0.99, 0.70, 0.71 (95%CI 0.56-0.89; P
    for trend<0.0001) in women. Total caffeine intake
    from coffee and other sources was associated with a
    significantly lower risk of diabetes in both men and
    women (Multivariate RRs comparing extreme quintiles
    of caffeine intake were 0.78 (95% CI 0.65-0.95, p for
    trend=0.003) for men and 0.70 (95% CI 0.63-0.79, p
    for trend < 0.0001) for women).

    Quoted message said:

    These data suggest that long-term coffee consumption is
    associated with a significantly lower risk of type 2
    diabetes in both men and women. Category: Nutrition"

    Quoted message said:

    Back to my java :-)

    Quoted message said:

    Maybe I should have drunk more of it when I was younger;
    but I suspect I'd still be here.

    --
    This address is for information only. I do not claim that
    these views are those of the Statistics Department or of
    Purdue University. Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics,
    Purdue University [email hidden] Phone: (765)494-
    6054 FAX: (765)494-0558

  4. On 28 May 2004 12:22:00 -0500, [email hidden] (Herman

    Rubin) said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Alan said:

    In browsing through the abstracts of the 63rd ADA
    Scientific sessions, I came across this one.

    Because of the length, I am top posting.

    According to the data, there does not seem to be much of an
    effect until the 4-5 cups/day level is reached. It is
    practical significance, not statistical significance, which
    needs to be looked at.

    Also, are you sure that ALL the diabetes risk factors were
    taken into account? I can think of several more. In fact,
    there is even one potential argument which would invalidate
    the study completely, and there is no way it can be ruled
    out. That is that caffeine use could increase the early
    onset of type 2 diabetes, which would exclude from the
    study those who were most sensitive to the effects of
    caffeine already.

    This is always a problem in studies of this type; there can
    be one or more confounding factors. That is one reason why
    much is done with experimental animals; one can control
    most of what they are doing from birth. Even there,
    problems arise.

    Now I am a statistician; if I can think of several factors
    that might be ignored, I would expect medical researchers
    to think of far more. It may be that they do not know how
    to analyze the data if that is collected, and it might be
    that nobody can do a good job, but some of us can do fair
    jobs with the full models available. Even when we cannot,
    we might be able to suggest the way to do further
    experimentation.

    Hi Herman

    Can't argue with you; but you may want to have a look at the
    forum it was presented to, where I'm sure such questions
    were asked from the floor - or maybe over a cup of coffee
    afterwards:-)

    I had a passing interest in the subject when I first arrived
    here and posted queries on coffee and caffeine a couple of
    times. I got almost no responses, so I did some searching on
    medscape and google.

    The surprising thing, from memory, was the lack of
    conclusive evidence on the subject and the confusing
    conclusions. It seemed to me that the evils of coffee,
    consumed in normal quantities, were somewhat of an urban
    myth. Anything consumed to excess is, IMO, dangerous, so I
    discount any study based on excessive consumption.

    So, until I see a credible study from a reputable source,
    I'll drink my two to four strong mugs a day, made from the
    grounds, some with cinnamon bark and some with whole cream.

    JMO

    Cheers, Alan, T2 d&e, Australia. Remove weight and
    carbs to email.
    --
    Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

  5. On 28 May 2004 12:22:00 -0500, [email hidden] (Herman

    Rubin) said:

    Now I am a statistician; if I can think of several factors
    that might be ignored, I would expect medical researchers
    to think of far more. It may be that they do not know how
    to analyze the data if that is collected, and it might be
    that nobody can do a good job, but some of us can do fair
    jobs with the full models available. Even when we cannot,
    we might be able to suggest the way to do further
    experimentation.

    I'll bet you they don't care. I noticed that with a lot of
    "reports" done since the mid-90's. The first were ones
    claiming diabetes was caused by dairy milk.

    That one report had 42 people tested, and they tested only
    for proteins. Wel lduh, almost al lfood is broken down into
    component parts, so just cause you find it in the
    bloodstream doesn't mean it came fro mmilk. Second, no
    causation ws listed or tested for. Nuthin'!

    This isn't a report. It's propaganda for coffee
    manufacturers.

  6. Caffeine Can Decrease Insulin Sensitivity in Humans
    care.diabetesjournals.org364

    Caffeine ingestion elevates plasma insulin response in
    humans during an oral glucose tolerance test pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.carp2 abst e
    026_79_ns_nf_cjpp7-01

    "Alan" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 28 May 2004 12:22:00 -0500, [email hidden]

    (Herman Rubin) said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Alan said:

    In browsing through the abstracts of the 63rd ADA
    Scientific sessions, I came across this one.

    Because of the length, I am top posting.

    According to the data, there does not seem to be much of
    an effect until the 4-5 cups/day level is reached. It is
    practical significance, not statistical significance,
    which needs to be looked at.

    Also, are you sure that ALL the diabetes risk factors
    were taken into account? I can think of several more. In
    fact, there is even one potential argument which would
    invalidate the study completely, and there is no way it
    can be ruled out. That is that caffeine use could
    increase the early onset of type 2 diabetes, which would
    exclude from the study those who were most sensitive to
    the effects of caffeine already.

    This is always a problem in studies of this type; there
    can be one or more confounding factors. That is one
    reason why much is done with experimental animals; one
    can control most of what they are doing from birth. Even
    there, problems arise.

    Now I am a statistician; if I can think of several
    factors that might be ignored, I would expect medical
    researchers to think of far more. It may be that they do
    not know how to analyze the data if that is collected,
    and it might be that nobody can do a good job, but some
    of us can do fair jobs with the full models available.
    Even when we cannot, we might be able to suggest the way
    to do further experimentation.

    Hi Herman

    Can't argue with you; but you may want to have a look at
    the forum it was presented to, where I'm sure such
    questions were asked from the floor - or maybe over a cup
    of coffee afterwards:-)

    I had a passing interest in the subject when I first
    arrived here and posted queries on coffee and caffeine a
    couple of times. I got almost no responses, so I did some
    searching on medscape and google.

    The surprising thing, from memory, was the lack of
    conclusive evidence on the subject and the confusing
    conclusions. It seemed to me that the evils of coffee,
    consumed in normal quantities, were somewhat of an urban
    myth. Anything consumed to excess is, IMO, dangerous, so I
    discount any study based on excessive consumption.

    So, until I see a credible study from a reputable
    source, I'll drink my two to four strong mugs a day,
    made from the grounds, some with cinnamon bark and some
    with whole cream.

    JMO

    Cheers, Alan, T2 d&e, Australia. Remove weight and carbs
    to email.
    --
    Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-
    virus system (grisoft.comgrisoft.com). Version: 6.0.692 /
    Virus Database: 453 - Release Date: 5/28/2004

  7. On Sat, 29 May 2004 18:11:09 -0400, "David Smith"

    Quoted message said:


    Caffeine Can Decrease Insulin Sensitivity in Humans http:/-
    /care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/25/2/364

    Caffeine ingestion elevates plasma insulin response in
    humans during an oral glucose tolerance test pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.carp2 abst e
    026_79_ns_nf_cjpp7-01

    Apart from liking a cup of coffee, my interest here is
    academic; I don't own a plantation or coffee shop.

    The cites given are interesting, although small, studies.
    The first was 12 subjects, the second not clear.

    One of the difficulties I have with studies like that is
    that they use IV caffeine in lieu of a cup of coffee. To
    make it relevant to drinking a beverage there are many other
    factors, including the speed of conversion of that drink to
    caffeine in the bloodstream. A cup of coffee, sipped over
    several minutes, combined with possibly cream, sugar or
    sweetener, is a different situation to a caffeine IV. To me,
    that's no more relevant than injecting alcohol into the
    bloodstream to evaluate the effects of wine.

    Maybe these studies were in the author's mind when they said
    in the opening sentence from the study quoted in my initial
    post: " In small short-term studies, acute administration of
    caffeine decreases insulin sensitivity and impairs glucose
    tolerance. Because tolerance to the humoral and hemodynamic
    effects of caffeine typically develops with chronic use, it
    is difficult to extrapolate findings from short-term studies
    to chronic use of coffee and other caffeinated beverages. We
    followed 42,888 men from 1986 to 1998 and 85,056 women from
    1980 to 1998;"

    and their conclusion:

    " Total caffeine intake from coffee and other sources was
    associated with a significantly lower risk of diabetes in
    both men and women (Multivariate RRs comparing extreme
    quintiles of caffeine intake were .78 (95% CI 0.65-0.95, p
    for trend=0.003) for men and 0.70 (95% CI .63-0.79, p for
    trend < 0.0001) for women). "

    I'm sure one could find faults in this study too, but to me
    it is more credible, using a statistically significant
    sample over a long term drinking real coffee. One wonders
    why the researchers in those small studies didn't just give
    the subjects cups of carefully analysed coffee, and measure
    the levels of resulting caffeine to relate to their other
    measurements. Too obvious and simplistic? Maybe I think like
    a Vulcan too much.

    Cheers, Alan, T2 d&e, Australia. Remove weight and
    carbs to email.
    --
    Everything in Moderation - Except Laughter.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.