"Jon Isaacs" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Cadence is really unimportant, especially for a beginner.
There is are no
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:special techniques to pedaling, just ride frequently and
you'll get stronger.
Quoted message said:
I agree with Peter. My guess is that your cadence is
probably higher than
Quoted message said:45rpm but it may not be, no big deal, just ride your bike
and as you become
Quoted message said:more comfortable you will find a comfortable cadence.
Trying to model yourself after a successful rider like
Lance Armstrong is a
Quoted message said:mistake, rather you need to discover what works best for
you, your body type,
Quoted message said:your bicycle fit, what you are trying to do etc....
For some people low cadences work just fine. I find that
often I ride along at
Quoted message said:45 or 50 rpm and for me this conserves my energy better
than riding at 90 or
Quoted message said:100 rpm. If I want to produce some real power then I
might spin it up to 140
Quoted message said:rpm for short burst or just playing around I might top 200
for a few seconds.
Quoted message said:I can do a 20km time trial at 95-100 rpm but I will go
faster if I am down
Quoted message said:around 75 rpm.
This is not to say that you should do what I do, rather
simply that this is
Quoted message said:what I have discovered about myself and that you need to
cycle enough to
Quoted message said:discover what works for you.
When Lance won his first tour de France riding at high
cadences it was all the
Quoted message said:talk.
Soon after the world Time Trial championship was won at a
cadence of around
Quoted message said:70rpm and that was all the talk.
Fashion comes and goes, what is important to discover what
works for you, not
Quoted message said:some other fellow.
I read that a big part of Lance's training had to do with improving his power and efficiency over a
wider range of cadences -- making him just as efficient at 60 RPM as 100 RPM, for example. Many
riders have a narrow PRM range at which they're efficient, or at which they like to pedal. So
developing some flexibility with respect to this can be a big advantage. Like with racing cars, it's
not always the maximum horspower that makes the difference, but the "area under the curve."
This is why a fixed gear bike has long been considered a good training device.
Quoted message said:As Jobst says: "RIDE BIKE"
That's the bottom line. I don't think it pays to get hung up on this stuff, even if you're at a very
high level. Ride what you got, and ride it a lot.
Matt O.