Road Cycling · Public discussion

Crank arm length question

Started by David Kerber · · Last activity · 14 posts · 732 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
17 May 2004
Last activity
20 May 2004
Original author
David Kerber
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
732
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The root question:

    How do I determine the appropriate starting-point for crank-
    arm length?

    The background:

    I have posted in the past about a minor soreness across the
    top of my kneecap which shows up several miles into a ride,
    and which always goes away by the next day. I have raised my
    seat as much as I can without rocking my hips, and the last
    adjustment of 3mm or so a month ago helped significantly,
    but not completely. Some other reading I've done has
    indicated that a too-long crank arm can contribute to knee
    soreness, which of course brings up the question of how to
    determine the correct length. My current ones are 175mm, and
    I wear pants with a 32 inch inseam (I haven't measured my
    crotch-to-ground height yet). Is it likely that a shorter
    crank might help? If so, how short?

    --
    Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in
    the newsgroups if possible).

  2. On Mon, 17 May 2004 10:06:31 -0400, David Kerber

    ns_dkerber@ns_ids.net said:

    The root question:

    How do I determine the appropriate starting-point for
    crank-arm length?

    Find a helpful bike shop that will let you try different
    lengths? 🙂

    Quoted message said:

    The background:

    I have posted in the past about a minor soreness across the
    top of my kneecap which shows up several miles into a ride,
    and which always goes away by the next day. I have raised
    my seat as much as I can without rocking my hips, and the
    last adjustment of 3mm or so a month ago helped
    significantly, but not completely. Some other reading I've
    done has indicated that a too-long crank arm can contribute
    to knee soreness, which of course brings up the question of
    how to determine the correct length. My current ones are
    175mm, and I wear pants with a 32 inch inseam (I haven't
    measured my crotch-to-ground height yet). Is it likely that
    a shorter crank might help? If so, how short?

    Have you tried moving the seat forward? That took away my
    upper kneecap aches. I've even lowered the saddle down a
    bit, having raised it again and again while the seat was
    back, and things are fine.

    A discussion of crank length, with links to other articles-

    myra-simon.comcranks.html

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    On Mon, 17 May 2004 10:06:31 -0400, David Kerber

    ns_dkerber@ns_ids.net said:

    The root question:

    How do I determine the appropriate starting-point for
    crank-arm length?

    Find a helpful bike shop that will let you try different
    lengths? 🙂

    Quoted message said:

    The background:

    I have posted in the past about a minor soreness across
    the top of my kneecap which shows up several miles into a
    ride, and which always goes away by the next day. I have
    raised my seat as much as I can without rocking my hips,
    and the last adjustment of 3mm or so a month ago helped
    significantly, but not completely. Some other reading
    I've done has indicated that a too-long crank arm can
    contribute to knee soreness, which of course brings up
    the question of how to determine the correct length. My
    current ones are 175mm, and I wear pants with a 32 inch
    inseam (I haven't measured my crotch-to-ground height
    yet). Is it likely that a shorter crank might help? If
    so, how short?

    Have you tried moving the seat forward? That took away my
    upper kneecap aches. I've even lowered the saddle down a
    bit, having raised it again and again while the seat was
    back, and things are fine.

    The seat's already close to as far forward as it can go, but
    I'll see if I've got any room left at all.

    Quoted message said:

    A discussion of crank length, with links to other articles-

    myra-simon.comcranks.html

    Thanks for that.

    --
    Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in
    the newsgroups if possible).

  4. David Kerber said:

    The root question:

    How do I determine the appropriate starting-point for
    crank-arm length?


    <snip>

    Seems to be a rather hearty investigation of the
    subject here:

    cranklength.infoindex.htm

    - khill

  5. On Mon, 17 May 2004 13:50:13 -0400, David Kerber

    ns_dkerber@ns_ids.net said:

    The seat's already close to as far forward as it can go,
    but I'll see if I've got any room left at all.

    Some (most?) seatposts have the clamp slightly offset
    instead of centered over the tube; turn the seatpost around,
    remount the saddle, and make sure there's still enough tilt
    available (not always).
    --
    Rick Onanian

  6. On Mon, 17 May 2004 10:06:31 -0400, David Kerber

    ns_dkerber@ns_ids.net said:

    My current ones are 175mm, and I wear pants with a 32 inch
    inseam (I haven't measured my crotch-to-ground height
    yet). Is it likely that a shorter crank might help? If so,
    how short?

    175 is pretty long. I used 172.5 with my 30 inch inseam, but
    went down to 165 and am surprisingly happy; I expected not
    to like them.
    --
    Rick Onanian

  7. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    On Mon, 17 May 2004 13:50:13 -0400, David Kerber

    ns_dkerber@ns_ids.net said:

    The seat's already close to as far forward as it can go,
    but I'll see if I've got any room left at all.

    Some (most?) seatposts have the clamp slightly offset
    instead of centered over the tube; turn the seatpost
    around, remount the saddle, and make sure there's still
    enough tilt available (not always).

    Yeah, I'm still playing with things as I get more miles
    in. I tweaked the tilt by 1/2 a turn last night, so I'll
    wait a bit before adjusting anything else, but I've still
    got about .5 cm of room left to go forward with it if I
    decide to do so.

    --
    Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in
    the newsgroups if possible).

  8. Quoted message said:

    On Mon, 17 May 2004 10:06:31 -0400, David Kerber

    ns_dkerber@ns_ids.net said:

    My current ones are 175mm, and I wear pants with a 32 inch
    inseam (I haven't measured my crotch-to-ground height
    yet). Is it likely that a shorter crank might help? If so,
    how short?

    175 is pretty long. I used 172.5 with my 30 inch inseam,
    but went down to 165 and am surprisingly happy; I expected
    not to like them.

    I'm not so sure about that.

    My Levi's are a 32 inch inseam and I run 175's on my
    mountain bike and tandem, and 172.5's on my road bike.

    My wife has a 28 inch inseam and rides 165's.

    YMMV.

    Chris Neary [email hidden]

    "Science, freedom, beauty, adventure: what more could you
    ask of life? Bicycling combined all the elements I loved" -
    Adapted from a quotation by Charles Lindbergh

  9. I said:
    Quoted message said:

    175 is pretty long. I used 172.5 with my 30 inch inseam,
    but went down to 165 and am surprisingly happy; I expected
    not to like them.


    On Wed, 19 May 2004 01:23:52 GMT, Chris Neary

    Quoted message said:

    I'm not so sure about that.

    My Levi's are a 32 inch inseam and I run 175's on my
    mountain bike and tandem, and 172.5's on my road bike.

    Mountain bikes have very different requirements for crank
    length. I don't know anything about tandems.

    Quoted message said:

    My wife has a 28 inch inseam and rides 165's.

    Make sure you're measuring both your inseams accurately; for
    biking purposes, it's not which pants are comfortable, but
    rather the exact height from the floor to your crotch. One
    method I read somewhere is to stand with your feet flat and
    your back (and legs) against a wall, and hold a book with
    one edge against the wall and one edge up to your leg joint
    (as high as it can), and measure from the book's crotch edge
    to the floor.

    Of course, having said that, I don't remember if my inseam
    was 30 inches when I measured that way. 😉

    Quoted message said:

    YMMV.

    Agreed...In fact, that's the most important rule about
    crank length.
    --
    Rick Onanian

  10. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    My Levi's are a 32 inch inseam and I run 175's on my
    mountain bike and tandem, and 172.5's on my road bike.

    Mountain bikes have very different requirements for crank
    length. I don't know anything about tandems.

    Mountain bikes, tandems, and time trial bikes tend to have
    slightly longer cranks since cadence on these bikes is
    usually lower but torque is somewhat higher.

    Fixed gear bikes, OTOH, tend to run shorter cranks for the
    opposite reason, as well to avoid pedal strikes in some
    instances. My fixie has 170mm cranks.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    My wife has a 28 inch inseam and rides 165's.

    Make sure you're measuring both your inseams accurately;
    for biking purposes, it's not which pants are comfortable,
    but rather the exact height from the floor to your crotch.
    One method I read somewhere is to stand with your feet flat
    and your back (and legs) against a wall, and hold a book
    with one edge against the wall and one edge up to your leg
    joint (as high as it can), and measure from the book's
    crotch edge to the floor.

    Of course, having said that, I don't remember if my inseam
    was 30 inches when I measured that way. 😉

    I answered the question as I did since the original poster
    only supplied his pants inseam. What size pants do you wear?

    Chris Neary [email hidden]

    "Science, freedom, beauty, adventure: what more could you
    ask of life? Bicycling combined all the elements I loved" -
    Adapted from a quotation by Charles Lindbergh

  11. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Chris Neary said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    My Levi's are a 32 inch inseam and I run 175's on my
    mountain bike and tandem, and 172.5's on my road bike.

    Mountain bikes have very different requirements for crank
    length. I don't know anything about tandems.

    Mountain bikes, tandems, and time trial bikes tend to have
    slightly longer cranks since cadence on these bikes is
    usually lower but torque is somewhat higher.

    Why do mountain bikes run long cranks? Torque can be
    adjusted with lower gearing to make the gain ratio
    <http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gain.html> come out the same,
    and pedal strikes are a huge problem for mountain bikes even
    on straight stretches.

    I intend to put this theory to the test as soon as I find
    some 165 mm cranks that fit within my budget.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden]
    sfu.cawiredcola President, Fabrizio
    Mazzoleni Fan Club

  12. I said:
    Quoted message said:

    Of course, having said that, I don't remember if my inseam
    was 30 inches when I measured that way. 😉


    On Wed, 19 May 2004 23:50:51 GMT, Chris Neary

    Quoted message said:

    I answered the question as I did since the original
    poster only supplied his pants inseam. What size pants do
    you wear?

    Inseam 30, or 29 if I can find it, but my pants don't relate
    particularly well to my actual physical inseam. It seems the
    only choices in pants are to have the belt up around your
    neck, or to have the crotch near your knees (and the legs
    way too long) (like that silly urban style seen among
    today's youths).

    If I created a new line of jeans, they'd be made at least
    partially out of coolmax, and the belt-to-crotch height
    would be very short, allowing guys with aerobellies to be
    comfortable both at the waist AND at the crotch.

    Then, my inseam would probably be 30 or maybe even a little
    more, without having to struggle with the damned hem...and I
    wouldn't have to alternate between looking like an old fart
    and looking like a young fool.
    --
    Rick Onanian

  13. On Wed, 19 May 2004 18:14:06 -0700, Ryan Cousineau <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Why do mountain bikes run long cranks? Torque can be
    adjusted with lower gearing to make the gain ratio
    <http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gain.html> come out the same,
    and pedal strikes are a huge problem for mountain bikes
    even on straight stretches.

    While pedal strikes are a big issue, a few millimeters won't
    help. Off roading includes very random quick bits of
    different grades and unexpected slowdowns from terrain. Gear
    choice is neither an art nor a science, and often it is a
    terrible time to change gears right when you need to. As a
    result, it's helpful to have whatever leverage you can
    available to shove a buttload of torque into whatever gear
    you happen to be in.

    This, of course, has been pulled entirely from the MYASS
    system: xs4all.nlmillenia.html
    --
    Rick Onanian

  14. Rick Onanian said:

    Inseam 30, or 29 if I can find it

    tail.php?imagename=littlepecker.jpg&category=Toys&date=2004-
    05-20

    Bill "sorry, Rick -- too easy to pass up 🙂 " S.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.