Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Trail mapping GPS?

Started by Kantspel · · Last activity · 12 posts · 953 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
10 May 2004
Last activity
12 May 2004
Original author
Kantspel
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
953
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'm in the market for a cheap gps unit that I only need for
    one application, making trail maps. Can anyone help me out
    with this? Googling got me so far, but I'm having a tough
    time wading through all the different
    brands/models/features.

    I want to make a map of my favorite local trail which is
    very compact (lots of trail on not a lot of land) so the
    unit will need to take frequent map points and be reasonably
    accurate. My budget is under $200 and that will need to
    cover the GPS, software, and hopefully a bar mount.

    The part I'm most worried about is the ability to take very
    frequent map points. The first trail that I want to map is
    extremely dense and so I figure there will need to be map
    points every few yards. If the unit can't take points that
    often then I guess I'll have to re ride it over and over to
    get the density of points needed, basicly a running average.
    In the latter case it will need to be accurate enough that
    each ride will line up and not be too far offset from
    previouse trips.

    1. Any recommendations or anti reccomendations for
    the GPS unit?
    2. Is there a particular feature(s) that I should be
    keeping an eye on?
    3. Will I need to get additional software to make my life
    easier or will the GPS come bundled with what I need
    (the end goal is to print a map)?

  2. Garmin has come out with new models so the Legend should be
    fairly cheap. Bought it new for $150 about a year ago. I
    like national geographic map software to make maps and
    Garmin Mapsource Topo to load into unit.

    gpsinformation.netgpsinformation.net

    gps-practice-and-fun.comindex.html

    maps.nationalgeographic.comtopo

    "kantspel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm in the market for a cheap gps unit that I only need
    for one application, making trail maps. Can anyone help me
    out with this? Googling got me so far, but I'm having a
    tough time wading through all the different
    brands/models/features.

    I want to make a map of my favorite local trail which is
    very compact (lots of trail on not a lot of land) so the
    unit will need to take frequent map points and be
    reasonably accurate. My budget is under $200 and that
    will need to cover the GPS, software, and hopefully a
    bar mount.

    The part I'm most worried about is the ability to take
    very frequent map points. The first trail that I want to
    map is extremely dense and so I figure there will need to
    be map points every few yards. If the unit can't take
    points that often then I guess I'll have to re ride it
    over and over to get the density of points needed, basicly
    a running average. In the latter case it will need to be
    accurate enough that each ride will line up and not be too
    far offset from previouse trips.

    1. Any recommendations or anti reccomendations for the
    GPS unit?
    2. Is there a particular feature(s) that I should be
    keeping an eye on?
    3. Will I need to get additional software to make my life
    easier or will the GPS come bundled with what I need
    (the end goal is to print a


    map)?

  3. "kantspel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm in the market for a cheap gps unit that I only need
    for one application, making trail maps. Can anyone help me
    out with this? Googling got me so far, but I'm having a
    tough time wading through all the different
    brands/models/features.

    I want to make a map of my favorite local trail which is
    very compact (lots of trail on not a lot of land) so the
    unit will need to take frequent map points and be
    reasonably accurate. My budget is under $200 and that
    will need to cover the GPS, software, and hopefully a
    bar mount.

    The part I'm most worried about is the ability to take
    very frequent map points. The first trail that I want to
    map is extremely dense and so I figure there will need to
    be map points every few yards. If the unit can't take
    points that often then I guess I'll have to re ride it
    over and over to get the density of points needed, basicly
    a running average. In the latter case it will need to be
    accurate enough that each ride will line up and not be too
    far offset from previouse trips.

    1. Any recommendations or anti reccomendations for the
    GPS unit?
    2. Is there a particular feature(s) that I should be
    keeping an eye on?
    3. Will I need to get additional software to make my life
    easier or will the GPS come bundled with what I need
    (the end goal is to print a


    map)?

    Garmin Geko 201
    --
    Pete Rissler web1.greatbasin.net~rissler
    tccycling.comtccycling.com

  4. kantspel <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I want to make a map of my favorite local trail which is
    very compact


    (lots of trail on not a lot of land) so the unit will need
    to take frequent map points and be reasonably accurate. My
    budget is under $200 and that will need to cover the GPS,
    software, and hopefully a bar mount.

    The part I'm most worried about is the ability to take
    very frequent map points. The first trail that I want to
    map is extremely dense and so I figure there will need to
    be map points every few yards. If the unit can't take
    points that often then I guess I'll have to re ride it
    over and over to get the density of points needed, basicly
    a running average. In the latter case it will need to be
    accurate enough that each ride will line up and not be too
    far offset from previouse trips.

    I have a basic yellow eTrex ($100) with a handlebar mount
    ($15), homemade serial-GPS connection cable (free), and I
    plan to buy the Topofusion software ($40
    www.topofusion.com). So far I'm just using the Demo which is
    functional, but overlays "DEMO" on the maps and aerial
    photos. I use it for exactly what you planned to- plotting
    the trail and making a map/picture of the route. The eTrex
    takes a reading every second, so there are plenty of points
    along the way unless you are going really fast. If you don't
    get enough points to give a good map, you can re-ride the
    trail or walk it to get more points. The Topofusion software
    can merge multiple routes into one and can also create a
    trail network if you want to connect intersecting routes in
    one file. GPS is a neat gadget- I tell people that the max
    speed on mine (560 mph) is from the downhill section under
    the powerlines.

  5. Patrick C. said:

    kantspel <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I want to make a map of my favorite local trail which is
    very compact

    (lots of trail on not a lot of land) so the unit will need
    to take frequent map points and be reasonably accurate. My
    budget is under $200 and that will need to cover the GPS,
    software, and hopefully a bar mount.

    The part I'm most worried about is the ability to take
    very frequent map points. The first trail that I want to
    map is extremely dense and so I figure there will need to
    be map points every few yards. If the unit can't take
    points that often then I guess I'll have to re ride it
    over and over to get the density of points needed, basicly
    a running average. In the latter case it will need to be
    accurate enough that each ride will line up and not be too
    far offset from previouse trips.

    I have a basic yellow eTrex ($100) with a handlebar mount
    ($15), homemade serial-GPS connection cable (free), and I
    plan to buy the Topofusion software ($40
    www.topofusion.com). So far I'm just using the Demo which
    is functional, but overlays "DEMO" on the maps and aerial
    photos. I use it for exactly what you planned to- plotting
    the trail and making a map/picture of the route. The eTrex
    takes a reading every second, so there are plenty of
    points along the way unless you are going really fast. If
    you don't get enough points to give a good map, you can
    re-ride the trail or walk it to get more points. The
    Topofusion software can merge multiple routes into one and
    can also create a trail network if you want to connect
    intersecting routes in one file. GPS is a neat gadget- I
    tell people that the max speed on mine (560 mph) is from
    the downhill section under the powerlines.

    Thanks a bunch. Once per second would be ideal, and the
    software sounds like it can do what I need.

  6. kantspel said:
    Patrick C. said:

    kantspel <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    >I want to make a map of my favorite local trail which is
    >very compact

    (lots of trail on not a lot of land) so the unit will
    need to take frequent map points and be reasonably
    accurate. My budget is under $200 and that will need to
    cover the GPS, software, and hopefully a bar mount.

    The part I'm most worried about is the ability to take
    very frequent map points. The first trail that I want to
    map is extremely dense and so I figure there will need to
    be map points every few yards. If the unit can't take
    points that often then I guess I'll have to re ride it
    over and over to get the density of points needed,
    basicly a running average. In the latter case it will
    need to be accurate enough that each ride will line up
    and not be too far offset from previouse trips.

    I have a basic yellow eTrex ($100) with a handlebar mount
    ($15), homemade serial-GPS connection cable (free), and I
    plan to buy the Topofusion software ($40
    www.topofusion.com). So far I'm just using the Demo which
    is functional, but overlays "DEMO" on the maps and aerial
    photos. I use it for exactly what you planned to-
    plotting the trail and making a map/picture of the route.
    The eTrex takes a reading every second, so there are
    plenty of points along the way unless you are going
    really fast. If you don't get enough points to give a
    good map, you can re-ride the trail or walk it to get
    more points. The Topofusion software can merge multiple
    routes into one and can also create a trail network if
    you want to connect intersecting routes in one file. GPS
    is a neat gadget- I tell people that the max speed on
    mine (560 mph) is from the downhill section under the
    powerlines.

    Thanks a bunch. Once per second would be ideal, and the
    software sounds like it can do what I need.

    Once per second will give you too many points for a trail.
    Some units have a capacity of 1000 points which will last
    for only 20 minutes. If you set the track log to automatic
    the gps will detect itself if the trail has many windings
    and will record more points per minute. But when you ride a
    longer straight part the gps will only record a few points.

    For a better accuracy put the gps in your back pack or in
    your back pocket of your shirt. The gps needs a unobstructed
    view of the sky (satellites).

    I'm talking from experiences with a Garmin Geko 301. A
    cheaper Geko will do it as well.

    Greetings, Urs

    --
    +-------------------------
    | Urs Weder N 47°23'23" E 9°39'47"
    +------------------------- ( modify address for return email
    )

  7. On Mon, 10 May 2004 21:31:26 +0200, Urs Weder

    UrsWeder__a_t__hotmail__d_o_t__com said:

    Once per second will give you too many points for a trail.

    Not on a bicycle it won't.

    Barry

  8. Garmin eTrex
    garmin.cometrex

    Delorme Topo USA delorme.comtopousa

    and I HIGHLY reccomend a NiMH rechargable batteries and
    charger thomasdistributing.commh c204f
    4aa220dc.htm#combo Combo Kit #2 is the best deal

  9. kantspel said:

    I'm in the market for a cheap gps unit that I only need
    for one application, making trail maps. Can anyone help me
    out with this? Googling got me so far, but I'm having a
    tough time wading through all the different
    brands/models/features.

    I want to make a map of my favorite local trail which is
    very compact (lots of trail on not a lot of land) so the
    unit will need to take frequent map points and be
    reasonably accurate. My budget is under $200 and that
    will need to cover the GPS, software, and hopefully a
    bar mount.

    The part I'm most worried about is the ability to take
    very frequent map points. The first trail that I want to
    map is extremely dense and so I figure there will need to
    be map points every few yards. If the unit can't take
    points that often then I guess I'll have to re ride it
    over and over to get the density of points needed, basicly
    a running average. In the latter case it will need to be
    accurate enough that each ride will line up and not be too
    far offset from previouse trips.

    1. Any recommendations or anti reccomendations for the
    GPS unit?
    2. Is there a particular feature(s) that I should be
    keeping an eye on?
    3. Will I need to get additional software to make my life
    easier or will the GPS come bundled with what I need
    (the end goal is to print a map)?


    I gonna start messing with this on my ride today
    cru.frGPilotS runs through Palm OS.
    Buy a cheap GPS on ebay.

    Shawn

  10. There is a $30 rebate now on the Legend & Vista. It will do
    a 1,000 waypoints, saves up to 10 tracklogs of up to 750
    points each with 10,000 pts available. It runs $200 typical
    street price. We sell factory refurbished units for $159.
    Being a "Mapping unit" it comes with computer cable. Should
    be mounted close to horizontal for best reception.

    For a program to print/display, DeLorme TOPO 5 works great
    ($100)! Available on CDs or DVD and also regional editions
    for $50. Comes with free $50 download of Satellite/Aerial
    imgaery downloads. You can download,modify,upload
    Routes,Waypoints,Tracks unlike National Geographic. My
    dislike is that it does handle waypoint icons and comments.

    The Garmin MapSource products do not allow you to transfer
    single routes or tracklogs.

    For backup, screen prints etc I love GPStrackmaker
    www.gpstm.com it is free and another version is available as
    shareware.

    I personally use a Garmin GPS76 (same price as Legend).
    It's saved tracklogs are reduced to 250 points. If possible
    download to PC from active tracklog to have up to 3,000
    points. It does not allow you to turn off the tracklog so
    you have to clear at start of track and turn off at end.
    (If you forget you need to edit the tracklog to remove the
    extra points.)

    You can see some samples on my website at
    home.earthlink.net~gps dr

    Enjoy

    kantspel said:

    I'm in the market for a cheap gps unit that I only need
    for one application, making trail maps. Can anyone help me
    out with this? Googling got me so far, but I'm having a
    tough time wading through all the different
    brands/models/features.

    I want to make a map of my favorite local trail which is
    very compact (lots of trail on not a lot of land) so the
    unit will need to take frequent map points and be
    reasonably accurate. My budget is under $200 and that
    will need to cover the GPS, software, and hopefully a
    bar mount.

    The part I'm most worried about is the ability to take
    very frequent map points. The first trail that I want to
    map is extremely dense and so I figure there will need to
    be map points every few yards. If the unit can't take
    points that often then I guess I'll have to re ride it
    over and over to get the density of points needed, basicly
    a running average. In the latter case it will need to be
    accurate enough that each ride will line up and not be too
    far offset from previouse trips.

    1. Any recommendations or anti reccomendations for the
    GPS unit?
    2. Is there a particular feature(s) that I should be
    keeping an eye on?
    3. Will I need to get additional software to make my life
    easier or will the GPS come bundled with what I need
    (the end goal is to print a map)?

  11. Urs Weder <UrsWeder__a_t__hotmail__d_o_t__com> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    kantspel said:

    Thanks a bunch. Once per second would be ideal, and the
    software sounds like it can do what I need.

    Once per second will give you too many points for a
    trail. Some units have a capacity of 1000 points which
    will last for only 20 minutes. If you set the track log
    to automatic the gps will detect itself if the trail has
    many windings and will record more points per minute. But
    when you ride a longer straight part the gps will only
    record a few points.

    For a better accuracy put the gps in your back pack or in
    your back pocket of your shirt. The gps needs a
    unobstructed view of the sky (satellites).

    I'm talking from experiences with a Garmin Geko 301. A
    cheaper Geko will do it as well.

    Greetings, Urs

    I haven't had a problem with the track log on my basic
    eTrex getting
    full, even in 6+ hours of use. It only adds a point to
    the tracklog
    if you've moved more than 25 m so it doesn't add a point
    every second.
    Like you say, it sort of knows if you're moving straight
    or making a
    lot of turns which really maximizes the tracklog storage.
    I like the
    handle bar mount because it's always in view when you
    want it. Just
    don't try to look at your speed when you're on a
    technical section.

  12. kantspel said:

    I'm in the market for a cheap gps unit that I only need
    for one application, making trail maps. Can anyone help me
    out with this? Googling got me so far, but I'm having a
    tough time wading through all the different
    brands/models/features.

    I want to make a map of my favorite local trail which is
    very compact (lots of trail on not a lot of land) so the
    unit will need to take frequent map points and be
    reasonably accurate. My budget is under $200 and that
    will need to cover the GPS, software, and hopefully a
    bar mount.

    The part I'm most worried about is the ability to take
    very frequent map points. The first trail that I want to
    map is extremely dense and so I figure there will need to
    be map points every few yards. If the unit can't take
    points that often then I guess I'll have to re ride it
    over and over to get the density of points needed, basicly
    a running average. In the latter case it will need to be
    accurate enough that each ride will line up and not be too
    far offset from previouse trips.

    1. Any recommendations or anti reccomendations for the
    GPS unit?
    2. Is there a particular feature(s) that I should be
    keeping an eye on?
    3. Will I need to get additional software to make my life
    easier or will the GPS come bundled with what I need
    (the end goal is to print a map)?


    Thanks for all the advice. Monday night I went to REI with
    my rebate and a gift return in hand and blew it all on a
    Garmin Foretrex 201; only cost me $5 out of pocket! It was a
    little bit more ($170 vs $140) than a seemingly equivelent
    Geko, but it's tiny, has a rechargable battery, and comes
    with the PC cable.

    I've been goofing off with it and so far am quite pleased
    with it's features. I havn't gotten to ride on the trail
    yet, but have had it on for all of my outdoor trips, i even
    wore it as I mowed the lawn🙂 My impression so far is that
    it will do it's intended job quite well.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 1 guest ·0 bots ·1 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.