General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Shoe Quibbles

Started by Virginiaz · · Last activity · 3 posts · 432 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
8 May 2004
Last activity
8 May 2004
Original author
Virginiaz
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
432
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have a shoe quandary and appreciate feedback. Thanks
    in advance!

    Deja-new-runner here; low weekly miles, as I upgrade bones
    and connective tissue; chronic spin-cycler.

    Until recently, I hardly realized the difference/importance
    of various shoes for individual running/runners needs.  So
    alas, when I went to buy my first running shoes to start
    running again, I simply got something off the shelf that
    felt okay. (I typically wear NB crosstrainers).

    Anyway, I got NB 950s for my running needs (starting up
    after long absence).  At first, the shoes felt odd (low
    heel, intense rolling forefoot, but I grew to like the cushy
    feel).  After I broke the 950s in, I felt like they worked
    well for my treadmill running.  After reading more, I
    thought I'd better go get some really good shoes, based on
    my foot needs: fairly neutral, normal weight, do not over
    pronate, but need cushioning and flexibility; due to early
    ballet training, I have something of a "turnout" so my feet
    are not necessarilly parallel.

    So for my 2nd running shoes, I got Asics Gel-Nimbus.  They
    felt good in the store, and logic seemd on their side. But
    now I hate them.  I feel like I am running in boxes or cross-
    trainers:  I don't feel the cushioning and they feel rigid,
    hardly the flexible quality of the NB 950s.  Only now do I
    realized the
    NB 950s are really performance trainers, and so they are
    lighter and geared to speek. And in fact, they seem to
    urge me to shift my weight toward my forefoot, as though
    about to take off in a sprint; while coversely, the
    Nimbus keeps my weight on my heels, which seems
    "grounding" in an unappealing way.

    I really need to find something that works, as the variation
    will wreak more havoc with my injured knee.  Everytime I
    change shows, I feel my whole body trying to recalibrate its
    balance. Is this odd?

    Suggestions, or clues as to how to translate my needs into
    the right choice?  I've been reading shoe reviews but
    everything says the Nimbus is great, and I hate running in
    it, so far.  Perhaps I will grow to love the Nimbus, once I
    accustom myself to the change?

    My priorities are flexible foot, stable foot, and shock
    absorption.  Should I stick with the NB performance
    series, perhaps something in the 800s? The 900s seem to be
    outdated now.

    \\ - - // ( @ @ ) +--------oOOo-(_)--oOOo----
    + +------------------------Oooo----+ oooO
    ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_

  2. In article said:

    NB 950s are really performance trainers, and so they are
    lighter and geared to speek. And in fact, they seem to
    urge me to shift my weight toward my forefoot, as
    though about to take off in a sprint; while coversely,
    the Nimbus keeps my weight on my heels, which seems
    "grounding" in an unappealing way.

    The Nimbus is not a performance shoe, but the aim of a
    typical training run is not to run as fast as you can. If
    you want something lighter for your speed workouts, take a
    look at the Asics Verdict (and I'd recommend half a size up)

    Quoted message said:

    Suggestions, or clues as to how to translate my needs into
    the right choice?  I've been reading shoe reviews but
    everything says the Nimbus is great, and I hate running in
    it, so far.  Perhaps I will grow to love the Nimbus, once
    I accustom myself to the change?

    I'm quite happy with it as a training shoe, despite the fact
    that I'd call myself a "performance runner". But I don't use
    it during speedwork and certainly not racing.

    Quoted message said:

    My priorities are flexible foot, stable foot, and shock
    absorption.  Should I stick with the NB performance
    series, perhaps something in the 800s? The 900s seem to be
    outdated now.

    You could try the Asics Cumulus. But I'd recommend sticking
    with the Nimbus and pairing it with a lighter shoe for
    speedwork and racing.

    Also worth looking at for racing is the Asics Tiger Paw
    (very flexible in the forefoot, but not enough shock
    absorbtion for a general purpose trainer)

    Cheers,
    --
    Donovan Rebbechi pegasus.rutgers.edu~elflord

  3. Donovan said:

    << You could try the Asics Cumulus. But I'd recommend
    sticking with the Nimbus and pairing it with a lighter shoe
    for speedwork and racing.>>

    thanks for your thoughts. perhaps indeed i will come to
    love them!

    \\ - - // ( @ @ ) +--------oOOo-(_)--oOOo----
    + +------------------------Oooo----+ oooO
    ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.