OT: It has begun!

"Slacker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

No turning back now.

--
Slacker

I didn't hear Bush mention the world's children. And their children. Which must be a first.

Andy Chequer, freedom and peace mentioned lots though.

"Andy Chequer" <andy@(youdontwantthisbitinit)thisisasparagus.com> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Slacker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

No turning back now.

--
Slacker

I didn't hear Bush mention the world's children. And their children. Which must be a first.

Andy Chequer, freedom and peace mentioned lots though.

That's because we give a rat's [censored] bout some children or their mommy!
--
Slacker

"Slacker" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

No turning back now.

--

Not quite yet. Check back tomorrow night.

Pete

"Pete" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Slacker" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

No turning back now.

--

Not quite yet. Check back tomorrow night.

Pete

Yeah...just heard the same thing on BBC. A planned assassination attempt...I thought those
were illegal??
--
Slacker

"Slacker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Andy Chequer" <andy@(youdontwantthisbitinit)thisisasparagus.com> wrote in

message

Quoted message said:

"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Slacker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

No turning back now.

--
Slacker

I didn't hear Bush mention the world's children. And their children.

Which

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

must be a first.

Andy Chequer, freedom and peace mentioned lots though.

That's because we give a rat's [censored] bout some children or their mommy!

A couple of quotes I have heard (directly) from a few Americas as of late:

women and children."

Pretty pathetic in reality when you hear it live.

darsh

Quoted message said:

Slacker

"Slacker" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

Yeah...just heard the same thing on BBC. A planned assassination

attempt...I thought those were illegal??

Quoted message said:

--

A fine semantic line. "Assassination" is supposedly illegal. Removing an enemy command and control
structure is merely prudent in warfare. So...if you send in an army and blow him/them up, it's ok.
If you send in one guy with a rifle and shoot him, it's not ok.

And then there's 'regime change'. As brought into play by ex-President Clinton.

Pete

"Pete" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Slacker" <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

Yeah...just heard the same thing on BBC. A planned assassination

attempt...I thought those were illegal??

Quoted message said:

--

A fine semantic line. "Assassination" is supposedly illegal. Removing an enemy command and control
structure is merely prudent in warfare. So...if you send in an army and blow him/them up, it's ok.
If you send in one guy with a rifle and shoot him, it's not ok.

And then there's 'regime change'. As brought into play by ex-President Clinton.

Pete

Well that's messed up! We should nullify that law so we can save some frig'n money!
--
Slacker

"Darsh" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Slacker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Andy Chequer" <andy@(youdontwantthisbitinit)thisisasparagus.com> wrote

in

Quoted message said:

message

Quoted message said:

"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Slacker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
> No turning back now.
>
> --
> Slacker

I didn't hear Bush mention the world's children. And their children.

Which

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

must be a first.

Andy Chequer, freedom and peace mentioned lots though.

That's because we give a rat's [censored] bout some children or their mommy!

A couple of quotes I have heard (directly) from a few Americas as of late:

Quoted message said:

women and children."

the

Quoted message said:

Pretty pathetic in reality when you hear it live.

darsh

Quoted message said:

Slacker

Is this pathetic drivel supposed to be representative of America? You need to keep better company.

Marty

"Martees" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Darsh" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Slacker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

"Andy Chequer" <andy@(youdontwantthisbitinit)thisisasparagus.com>

wrote

Quoted message said:

in

Quoted message said:

message

Quoted message said:

"]news:[email hidden]...
>
> "Slacker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> "]news:[email hidden]...
> > No turning back now.
> >
> > --
> > Slacker
>
> I didn't hear Bush mention the world's children. And their children.

Which

Quoted message said:

> must be a first.
>
> Andy Chequer, freedom and peace mentioned lots though.

That's because we give a rat's [censored] bout some children or their mommy!

A couple of quotes I have heard (directly) from a few Americas as of

late:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

about

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

women and children."

Quoted message said:

the

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Pretty pathetic in reality when you hear it live.

darsh

Quoted message said:

Slacker

Is this pathetic drivel supposed to be representative of America? You need to keep better company.

I am not sure, but it is an example. It could be more of an example of America than you might think.
Those type of people don't protest, they don't participate in polls. They grumble. They watch
sports. I mean like all sports. I mean like high-school girls basketball in really small towns. When
the sporting season is low, they are sort of [censored].

This sporting idea is of course, by no mean, a direct trait that one can use alone to stereotype
these racists. There are many other traits and actions, but the message remains the same. Pure
ignorance. I think it makes them a bit nervous, and scared.

And by the way, I am happy with my cross-sectioned company thank you very little.

darsh

Quoted message said:

Marty

"Darsh" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

I am not sure, but it is an example. It could be more of an example of America than you might
think. Those type of people don't protest, they don't participate in polls. They grumble. They
watch sports. I mean like all sports. I mean like high-school girls basketball in really small
towns. When the sporting season is low, they are sort of [censored].

This sporting idea is of course, by no mean, a direct trait that one can use alone to stereotype
these racists. There are many other traits and actions, but the message remains the same. Pure
ignorance. I think it makes them a bit nervous, and scared.

It's the same caliber of people who do [censored] like this:
@.ef9e1e3"]http:[email hidden]@.ef9e1e3

There are stupid [censored] everywhere though, not just in the US.

JD