PING: Levelwave - the website

in article [email hidden], jmcquown at
[email hidden] wrote on 4/25/04 6:47 AM:

Quoted message said:

Okay, now that the collective 'we' have preserved the
domain name, how does one go about getting info on the
site updated? Is that you or the other John? Please
email me 🙂

Jill

Will you be moving your blog over there? I

Quoted message said:

Sheryl Rosen writes:

jmcquown said:

Okay, now that the collective 'we' have preserved the
domain name, how does one go about getting info on the
site updated? Is that you or the other John? Please
email me 🙂

Will you be moving your blog over there?

What's a "blog"?

---= BOYCOTT FRENCH--GERMAN (belgium) =--- ---= Move UNITED
NATIONS To Paris =--- Sheldon ```````````` "Life would be
devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."

PENMART01 said:

Quoted message said:

Sheryl Rosen writes:

jmcquown said:

Okay, now that the collective 'we' have preserved the
domain name, how does one go about getting info on the
site updated? Is that you or the other John? Please
email me 🙂

Will you be moving your blog over there?

What's a "blog"?

I doubt she even knows what she typed. Blog = a Weblog - "a
website that contains periodic reverse, chronologically
ordered posts on a common web page. Individual posts (which
taken together are the weblog) either share a particular
theme, or a single small group of authors."

She has no idea about the rfc website. It's not a blog.

I still have to wonder why she picks on my posts. It's not
like I direct them to her.

Jill

in article [email hidden], PENMART01 at
[email hidden] wrote on 4/25/04 12:11 PM:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Sheryl Rosen writes:

jmcquown said:

Okay, now that the collective 'we' have preserved the
domain name, how does one go about getting info on the
site updated? Is that you or the other John? Please
email me 🙂

Will you be moving your blog over there?

What's a "blog"?

Forgive me. I meant to type "diary".

in article [email hidden], jmcquown at
[email hidden] wrote on 4/25/04 12:41 PM:

Quoted message said:

PENMART01 said:

Quoted message said:

Sheryl Rosen writes:

jmcquown wrote:

> Okay, now that the collective 'we' have preserved the
> domain name, how does one go about getting info on the
> site updated? Is that you or the other John? Please
> email me 🙂

Will you be moving your blog over there?

What's a "blog"?

I doubt she even knows what she typed. Blog = a Weblog -
"a website that contains periodic reverse, chronologically
ordered posts on a common web page. Individual posts
(which taken together are the weblog) either share a
particular theme, or a single small group of authors."

She has no idea about the rfc website. It's not a blog.

I still have to wonder why she picks on my posts. It's not
like I direct them to her.

Jill

I know all about the RFC website. It's not a blog, and it
wasn't intended to be one. Neither is RFC itself.

But that never stopped you from posting every random thought
you ever had, food-related or not.

I was just hoping you'd move your web-journal over there,
and spare those of us who aren't interested in your latest
stud all of the gory details.

Sheryl Rosen said:

in article [email hidden],
jmcquown at [email hidden] wrote on 4/25/04
12:41 PM:

Quoted message said:

PENMART01 said:

> Sheryl Rosen writes:
>
> jmcquown wrote:
>
>> Okay, now that the collective 'we' have preserved the
>> domain name, how does one go about getting info on the
>> site updated? Is that you or the other John? Please
>> email me 🙂
>
> Will you be moving your blog over there?

What's a "blog"?

She has no idea about the rfc website. It's not a blog.

I still have to wonder why she picks on my posts. It's
not like I direct them to her.

Jill

I know all about the RFC website. It's not a blog, and it
wasn't intended to be one.

So why did you suggest I move my "blog" over there, eh? It's
not a posting site you nitwit.

Quoted message said:

Neither is RFC itself.

Funny, anyone else can post whatever and you don't slam
them for it.

Quoted message said:

But that never stopped you from posting every random
thought you ever had, food-related or not.

I was just hoping you'd move your web-journal over there,
and spare those of us who aren't interested in your latest
stud all of the gory details.

Don't know why you think I'm posting gory details... I
posted about restaurants in Addison/North Dallas. Shared
food and restaurant info. If some of the details were a bit
like Buffy Liar's ridiculous travel posts, so be it.

I haven't mentioned anything about my "stud" (by the way,
you're afraid of a man in his 50's aren't you? Silly woman)
other than to ask for wine recommendations for a trip next
month. You are the one who was so insistant to determine it
wasn't Ray I met in Dallas. I can only think you must be
terribly jealous.

mine.

Jill

in article [email hidden], jmcquown at
[email hidden] wrote on 4/25/04 1:55 PM:

Quoted message said:

I haven't mentioned anything about my "stud" (by the
way, you're afraid of a man in his 50's aren't you?
Silly woman)

Well, yeah, you have, but whatever. And I don't discuss the
men I date here, so where do you get any basis for that
statement? I'm not afraid of any man. And I'm CERTAINLY not
jealous of you.

in article [email hidden], jmcquown at
[email hidden] wrote on 4/25/04 1:55 PM:

Quoted message said:

You are the one who was so insistant to determine it
wasn't Ray I met in Dallas.

Insistent? I merely mentioned that I noticed you didn't say
it was Ray. How is that insistent? Insistent implies I asked
several times. That's not true. And I think someone else
inquired as well.

I DON'T CARE WHO YOU SCREW! Or even if you do or not. I
don't care about you. I don't like reading about you. And
even if I killfile you, I STILL have to read all about it,
because it's quoted.

That's all. No one else posts OT with the frequency you do.
No one posts such intimate details of your life like you do.

Sheryl Rosen said:

in article [email hidden],
PENMART01 at [email hidden] wrote on 4/25/04 12:11 PM:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Sheryl Rosen writes:

jmcquown wrote:

> Okay, now that the collective 'we' have preserved the
> domain name, how does one go about getting info on the
> site updated? Is that you or the other John? Please
> email me 🙂

Will you be moving your blog over there?

What's a "blog"?

Forgive me. I meant to type "diary".

And while we're at it, please explain why you felt the need
to respond to a post that was not directed towards you in
any way? You've proven my point.

Jill

Sheryl Rosen said:

in article
[email hidden], jmcquown
at [email hidden] wrote on 4/25/04 1:55 PM:

Quoted message said:

You are the one who was so insistant to determine it
wasn't Ray I met in Dallas.

Insistent? I merely mentioned that I noticed you didn't
say it was Ray. How is that insistent? Insistent implies I
asked several times. That's not true. And I think someone
else inquired as well.

Quoted message said:

I DON'T CARE WHO YOU SCREW! Or even if you do or not. I
don't care about you. I don't like reading about you. And
even if I killfile you, I STILL have to read all about it,
because it's quoted.

That's all. No one else posts OT with the frequency you
do. No one posts such intimate details of your life
like you do.

Hmmmm.... No one posts such intimate details? Fantasizing
here about a baseball player; about meeting his parents,
making him cookies in the hopes of interesting the *parents*
and by symbiosis you.... heh. NADS? Need I remind you of
that?! Talk about personal and totally unnecessary
information!

And yes, you did several times mention in posts about my
trip to Dallas gee, doesn't sound like she's talking about
Ray. Why that would matter to you, I don't know.

Funny, you do seem to be rather obsessed with what I'm doing
and posting.

Jill

jmcquown said:

Okay, now that the collective 'we' have preserved the
domain name, how does one go about getting info on the
site updated? Is that you or the other John? Please
email me 🙂

Children, please play together nicely (reference to the
other subthread).

I am the maintainer of the web site itself. If you want to
change something or put something new on it, please contact
me via email. Attachments are welcome if you zip them first.

When I get some time I plan on changing the site's guts to
something like a Wiki. This would allow all of you to update
and change things when necessary.

Information on and an example of Wiki: wiki.orgwiki.orgOpen ↗
wikipedia.orgwikipedia.orgOpen ↗

--
John Gaughan johngaughan.netjohngaughan.netOpen ↗
[email hidden]

in article [email hidden], jmcquown at
[email hidden] wrote on 4/25/04 2:27 PM:

Quoted message said:

Fantasizing here about a baseball player; about meeting
his parents, making him cookies in the hopes of
interesting the *parents* and by symbiosis you.... heh.

What the....? I dare you to go to Google and find the post
where I stated that I was baking cookies for a ballplayer
and meeting his parents. IT NEVER HAPPENED!

You're delusional again, Jill.

I did post about having met a ballplayer who knocked my
socks off. That was in July 2000. Never met his parents.
Never made him cookies. And never posted that I was
fantasizing about him, either. Just that he knocked my
socks off.

I might have posted about meeting a friend's parents, and
them thanking me for some cookies that I made for my friend.
But that was a year later, and he wasn't a ball player. And
we're still good friends 3 years later, in fact, he was here
for dinner tonight. And I posted about that here because I
got the recipe for those particular cookies from several
people here on the ng.

Wow, you used "symbiosis" in a sentence. And the context is
almost right, too! Isn't that a big word for you? Or did
someone give you a word a day calendar for Christmas?

jmcquown said:

I haven't mentioned anything about my "stud" (by the way,
you're afraid of a man in his 50's aren't you? Silly woman)

Now here's a blonde moment:

"I haven't mentioned anything about him (have I told you
he's 50?)"

Ahh, the irony.

-sw

jmcquown said:

And yes, you did several times mention in posts about my
trip to Dallas gee, doesn't sound like she's talking about
Ray. Why that would matter to you, I don't know.

You're the one that made your personal life public with all
this "I'm getting married! Looka at me!" "I'm not getting
married! Look at me again!", "Ray this... Ray That... Ray's
truck, Ray doesn't like this or that".

Sheesh. Of course some of us care (to see you fail).

-sw

In article <[email hidden]>,

(PENMART01) said:

Quoted message said:

Will you be moving your blog over there?

What's a "blog"? Sheldon ```````````` "Life would be
devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."

Shorthand for WebLog. (Do a google on blog and see what
comes up.)
--
-Barb, <www.jamlady.eboard.com> updated 3-29-04.

jmcquown said:

And while we're at it, please explain why you felt the need
to respond to a post that was not directed towards you in
any way? You've proven my point.

It's called Usenet, dimbo. Don't post here unless you're
addressing it to the whole world.

-sw

Steve Wertz said:

On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 13:31:21 -0500, "jmcquown"

Quoted message said:

And while we're at it, please explain why you felt the
need to respond to a post that was not directed towards
you in any way? You've proven my point.

It's called Usenet, dimbo. Don't post here unless you're
addressing it to the whole world.

So, all of us should respond to every thread?

Practice safe eating - always use condiments

sf said:

Steve Wertz said:

On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 13:31:21 -0500, "jmcquown"

Quoted message said:

And while we're at it, please explain why you felt the
need to

respond to a >post that was not directed towards you in
any way? You've proven my point.

It's called Usenet, dimbo. Don't post here unless you're
addressing it to the whole world.

So, all of us should respond to every thread?

Thank you. My point exactly. She makes excuses about not
killfiling me by saying other people will quote me so she
can still read my posts. It still does not require a
response, most of which are critical, [censored] and pointless.

As for Steve Wertz, gotta wonder why a person feels the need
to have different email addys all the time just so his
worthless posts will get through (kinda like that projectile
chick). I see the name and k/f yet another bogus address.
But I read your posts, sf, even if they are tagged onto ones
like his. Last time I checked, Usenet was a free world 🙂

Jill