Road Cycling · Public discussion

Museeuw vs. PVP

Started by Tom Kunich · · Last activity · 10 posts · 666 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
12 April 2004
Last activity
13 April 2004
Original author
Tom Kunich
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
666
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. It is pretty funny that those who say "Damn! Musseuw would
    have won again without that flat" don't take into account
    that PVP would certainly have beaten Museeuw in a two up
    sprint save for that flat.

  2. Tom Kunich said:

    It is pretty funny that those who say "Damn! Musseuw would
    have won again without that flat" don't take into account
    that PVP would certainly have beaten Museeuw in a two up
    sprint save for that flat.

    Huh? Museeuw flatted out of the lead group, which allowed
    him to be caught by Van Petegem. PVP couldn't have caught
    the lead group on his own. Or at least, he didn't, even with
    Museeuw to work with.

    The race-aftermath commentary on this group is even more
    omnisciently incoherent than usual today. It's good to
    see you gang have been training hard and are in fine
    form for July.

    Where's Henry anyway? He would have liked this, but he
    disappeared over a month ago and www.lhchang.com is gone.
    SDSteve? Anybody? Bueller?

  3. Benjamin Weiner said:


    Tom Kunich said:

    It is pretty funny that those who say "Damn! Musseuw
    would have won again without that flat" don't take into
    account that PVP would certainly have beaten Museeuw in
    a two up sprint save for that flat.

    Huh? Museeuw flatted out of the lead group, which allowed
    him to be caught by Van Petegem. PVP couldn't have caught
    the lead group on his own. Or at least, he didn't, even
    with Museeuw to work with.

    The race-aftermath commentary on this group is even more
    omnisciently incoherent than usual today. It's good to
    see you gang have been training hard and are in fine form
    for July.

    tom sometimes will say things to get a certain response he
    wants. pvp had his own flat while off the front on an
    attack and yet managed to get back to the group on his own,
    drop them, catch museeuw (what happened to wesseman btw?).
    who knows what he would have done without his own bad luck
    flat? maybe he's looking for something like that? if you
    spend too much time trying to guess what he wants you'll go
    batty, though.

    hh

  4. "h squared" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Benjamin Weiner said:


    Tom Kunich said:

    It is pretty funny that those who say "Damn! Musseuw
    would have won


    again

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    without that flat" don't take into account that PVP
    would certainly


    have

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    beaten Museeuw in a two up sprint save for that flat.

    Huh? Museeuw flatted out of the lead group, which
    allowed him to be caught by Van Petegem. PVP couldn't
    have caught the lead group on his own. Or at least, he
    didn't, even with Museeuw to work with.

    The race-aftermath commentary on this group is even more
    omnisciently incoherent than usual today. It's good to
    see you gang have been training hard and are in fine
    form for July.

    tom sometimes will say things to get a certain response he
    wants. pvp had his own flat while off the front on an
    attack and yet managed to get back to the group on his
    own, drop them, catch museeuw (what happened to wesseman
    btw?). who knows what he would have done without his own
    bad luck flat? maybe he's looking for something like that?
    if you spend too much time trying to guess what he wants
    you'll go batty, though.

    hh

    Tom would often think things had happened that had not. Very
    frustrating.

  5. "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    It is pretty funny that those who say "Damn! Musseuw would
    have won again without that flat" don't take into account
    that PVP would certainly have beaten Museeuw in a two up
    sprint save for that flat.

    There no "certainly" in cycling, otherwise Museeuw
    wouldn't have flatted in the last 100s meters of the last
    pavee section.

  6. "Elizabeth Ann" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Tom would often think things had happened that had not.
    Very frustrating.

    It's all in the drugs Brian. Everyone that rides a bike
    except you of course, is on drugs. That's why you have to
    settle for riding wth 12 year olds in order to find someone
    you can beat every once in awhile.

  7. h squared <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    tom sometimes will say things to get a certain response he
    wants. pvp had his own flat while off the front on an
    attack and yet managed to get back to the group on his
    own, drop them, catch museeuw (what happened to wesseman
    btw?). who knows what he would have done without his own
    bad luck flat? maybe he's looking for something like that?
    if you spend too much time trying to guess what he wants
    you'll go batty, though.

    I think he wants to convince people he is smart and persuade
    them to his point of view. However, if he succeeds on either
    count, then the reader is surely batty to start with.

    But I must be batty since I spent time trying to
    figure that out.

    NS

  8. "Tom Kunich" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Elizabeth Ann" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:Fcv-
    [email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Tom would often think things had happened that had
    not. Very


    frustrating.

    Quoted message said:


    It's all in the drugs Brian. Everyone that rides a bike
    except you of course, is on drugs. That's why you have to
    settle for riding wth 12 year olds in order to find
    someone you can beat every once in awhile.

    That is funny coming from the best known cat 5 for lifer.

  9. "Chris" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    That is funny coming from the best known cat 5 for lifer.

    You must have learned a lot about bicycle racing in your
    long pro career. Oh, wait, you're just some flunky
    amatuer bicycle racer who needs to believe that somehow a
    Cat 3 knows more than a Cat 4. Does it hurt to have a
    brain that puny?

  10. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Tom Kunich
    "Chris" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    That is funny coming from the best known cat 5 for lifer.



    You must have learned a lot about bicycle racing in your
    long pro career. Oh, wait, you're just some flunky
    amatuer bicycle racer who needs to believe that somehow a
    Cat 3 knows more than a Cat 4. Does it hurt to have a
    brain that puny?

    Now now girls...handbags at dawn. ..

    From what I could see PvP was miles stronger than JM and in fact he looked stronger than anyone else in the race. Like last year he just rode through the other riders like an adult in a kids race. There is no doubt in my mind that if he had not flatted that he would have won again.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.