UK and Europe · Public discussion

XTR sprockets

Started by Erik Lindeberg · · Last activity · 5 posts · 733 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
12 April 2004
Last activity
12 April 2004
Original author
Erik Lindeberg
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
733
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. 1. At the Shimano web site the rear derailleurs (RD-M960)
    are specified to service a 11T minimum and 34T maximum
    sprocket and 22T maximum front difference. All this
    information is clear to me, but I do not understand the
    specification called "Total Capacity" (43T for SGS and
    33T for SG). I understand that SGS (the derailleur with
    super long arm) can take up more slack than the SG (long
    arm) and also can handle a larger rear sprockets, but
    what does the notation 33T and 43T actually refer to?

    2. In all groups from Deore to Deore XT there is always a
    crank and a front derailleur that can be used with a
    maximum 48T front sprocket. On the XTR, however, (M960
    series) there seems to be no option to fit a larger than
    44T sprocket on the crank and the front derailleur FD-
    M961 can only service a 46T sprocket. Is this right or am
    I missing something? Is there a FC-M961 crank around the
    corner? I will build a no-compromise cross/hybrid with
    700C wheels and 11-34 rear sprocket and 26-36-48 crank
    and am considering the XTR group M960. Do I really have
    to stick with XT if I shall get my favorite gear ratios?

    Erik L (antispam: replace "com" with "no" in my e-mail
    address if you want to communicate with me directly, not
    recommended if you communicate about a news topic.)

  2. Erik Lindeberg said:

    1. At the Shimano web site the rear derailleurs (RD-M960)
    are specified to service a 11T minimum and 34T maximum
    sprocket and 22T maximum front difference. All this
    information is clear to me, but I do not understand
    the specification called "Total Capacity" (43T for SGS
    and 33T for SG). I understand that SGS (the derailleur
    with super long arm) can take up more slack than the
    SG (long arm) and also can handle a larger rear
    sprockets, but what does the notation 33T and 43T
    actually refer to?

    total capacity = (largest chainring - smallest chainring) +
    (largest sprocket - smallest sprocket)

    See sheldonbrown.comgloss ca m.html - Capacity

    note: "Competent riders can considerably exceed the
    official rated capacity, since they will not misuse
    the granny ring by running it with the smaller rear
    sprockets, so it doesn't matter if the chain hangs
    slack in those gears"

    ~PB

  3. "Erik Lindeberg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    2. In all groups from Deore to Deore XT there is always a
    crank and a front derailleur that can be used with a
    maximum 48T front sprocket. On the XTR, however, (M960
    series) there seems to be no option to fit a larger
    than 44T sprocket on the crank and the front derailleur
    FD-M961 can only service a 46T sprocket. Is this right
    or am I missing something? Is there a FC-M961 crank
    around the corner? I will build a no-compromise
    cross/hybrid with 700C wheels and 11-34 rear sprocket
    and 26-36-48 crank and am considering the XTR group
    M960. Do I really have to stick with XT if I shall get
    my favorite gear ratios?

    Pete already answered the first question so I'll just
    address your second. The main issue for max chainring size
    AIUI is the radius of the cage of the F Der. You might get
    away with 48T on one rated for 46T, and Sheldon on his site
    describes somewhere reprofiling a cage with a dremel tool.
    Otherwise if XT is rated for 48T you'll either have to use
    that for the FD (obviously you can still put XTR on the
    rear), or consider a road FD. FWIW, I have exactly that on
    my commuter bike - long cage XTR M960 on the rear and 105
    on the front with 52-42-30 chainrings. ATM the rear
    cassette is a 12-23, but I intend replacing it with an 11-
    32 when I go touring, which was the reason for choosing the
    XTR - 21 rear tooth difference + 22 front adds up nicely to
    its 43T max capacity.

    Remember that the M960 is rapid-rise BTW - quickest shifting
    is lower, not higher.

    Rich

  4. "Pete Biggs" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:c5dqcn$fqkc$1@ID-

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    but what does the notation 33T and 43T actually
    refer to?

    total capacity = (largest chainring - smallest chainring)
    + (largest sprocket - smallest sprocket) See sheldonbrown.comgloss ca
    m.html - Capacity
    note: "Competent riders can considerably exceed the
    official rated capacity, since they will not misuse
    the granny ring by running it with the smaller rear
    sprockets, so it doesn't matter if the chain hangs
    slack in those gears"


    Thank you, so I will need a capacity: (48 - 26) + (34 -11) =
    45. Despite I consider myself to be a fairly competent rider
    I will need the extra-long arm (SGS). Erik

  5. "Richard Goodman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Erik Lindeberg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    2. In all groups from Deore to Deore XT there is always
    a crank and a front derailleur that can be used with
    a maximum 48T front


    sprocket.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    On the XTR, however, (M960 series) there seems to be no
    option to fit a larger than 44T sprocket on the crank
    and the front derailleur FD-M961 can only service a 46T
    sprocket. Is this right or am I missing something? Is
    there a FC-M961 crank around the corner? I will build a
    no-compromise cross/hybrid with 700C wheels and 11-34
    rear sprocket and 26-36-48 crank and am considering the
    XTR group M960. Do I really have to stick with XT if I
    shall get my favorite gear


    ratios?

    Quoted message said:


    Pete already answered the first question so I'll just
    address your second. The main issue for max chainring size
    AIUI is the radius of the cage of


    the

    Quoted message said:

    F Der. You might get away with 48T on one rated for 46T,
    and Sheldon on


    his

    Quoted message said:

    site describes somewhere reprofiling a cage with a dremel
    tool. Otherwise if XT is rated for 48T you'll either have
    to use that for the FD


    (obviously

    Quoted message said:

    you can still put XTR on the rear), or consider a road FD.
    FWIW, I have exactly that on my commuter bike - long cage
    XTR M960 on the rear and 105


    on

    Quoted message said:

    the front with 52-42-30 chainrings. ATM the rear cassette
    is a 12-23,


    but

    Quoted message said:

    I intend replacing it with an 11-32 when I go touring,
    which was the


    reason

    Quoted message said:

    for choosing the XTR - 21 rear tooth difference + 22 front
    adds up nicely


    to

    Quoted message said:

    its 43T max capacity.

    Remember that the M960 is rapid-rise BTW - quickest
    shifting is lower, not higher.

    Rich


    Thank you, but is it possible to put larger than 44T
    chainrings on the XTR crank? Are these rings different than
    those for XT? I will take the rapid-rise challenge. Actually
    I have rapid-rise on my summer house old cross bike (Nexave
    400T). It is a pain to get used to, but with the combined
    controller on M960 I hope it will be easier. It seems to
    have come to stay..

    Erik

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.