UK and Europe · Public discussion

Hills

Started by Iain Jones · · Last activity · 10 posts · 653 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
11 April 2004
Last activity
12 April 2004
Original author
Iain Jones
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
653
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Been doing lots of thinking today about hills, and
    particularly cycling up them (aka "sado-masochism" in some
    cases). A few months back I saw a letter in one of the mags,
    from someone asking for contributions to a list of Britain's
    "cols", as there's lists of Europe's cols but none for us.
    Does anyone know anything of this, and if anything's come of
    it? I've tried searching on Google but "britain cycling
    cols" is a bit too vague to search on.

    And for my second question - I've tried to find out what the
    UCI's rules are on grading climbs, from lowly 4th to mighty
    Hors, and discovered there's no set rules. I know none of
    our "cols" get anywhere near the altitudes of the
    Alps/Pyrenees, and very few get the distance, but some of
    the longer ones get towards the average gradients. How do
    Britain's cols rank in terms of these categories?

    And how the hell do they RACE up those gradients?! (you
    don't need to answer that one!)

  2. a.. OCD Cycloclimbing is a club for cyclists who enjoy
    visiting high places by bicycle. (UK)
    b.. It is run separately from the Ordre des Cols Durs
    (OCD) in France
    c..
    d.. ocd.org.ukindex.html

    Hope this helps Iain

    "Iain Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Been doing lots of thinking today about hills, and
    particularly cycling up them (aka "sado-masochism" in some
    cases). A few months back I saw a


    letter

    Quoted message said:

    in one of the mags, from someone asking for contributions
    to a list of Britain's "cols", as there's lists of
    Europe's cols but none for us. Does anyone know anything
    of this, and if anything's come of it? I've tried
    searching on Google but "britain cycling cols" is a bit
    too vague to


    search

    Quoted message said:

    on.

    And for my second question - I've tried to find out what
    the UCI's rules are on grading climbs, from lowly 4th to
    mighty Hors, and discovered there's no set rules. I know
    none of our "cols" get anywhere near the altitudes of the
    Alps/Pyrenees, and very few get the distance, but some of
    the longer ones get towards the average gradients. How do
    Britain's cols rank in terms of these categories?

    And how the hell do they RACE up those gradients?! (you
    don't need to answer that one!)

  3. On 12/4/04 12:20 am, in article
    [email hidden], "Mart"

    Quoted message said:

    a.. OCD Cycloclimbing is a club for cyclists who enjoy
    visiting high places by bicycle. (UK)
    a.. It is run separately from the Ordre des Cols Durs
    (OCD) in France
    a..
    a.. ocd.org.ukindex.html

    It's not a guide to all the UK (unless Scotland was
    flattened overnight and I didn't notice).

    The little bump on my way home from any kind of decent ride
    is a mere 100m. The 50 miler I did on Thursday was a bit
    hilly with a high point of 270m and a low point of 44m (and
    included the local bump both ways.) This is just the local
    'ride from the house' stuff. Doesn't take much looking for.

    One of these days I might try a really hilly ride..

    ..d

  4. "David Martin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    a.. OCD Cycloclimbing is a club for cyclists who enjoy
    visiting high


    places

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    by bicycle. (UK)
    a.. It is run separately from the Ordre des Cols Durs
    (OCD) in France
    a..
    a.. ocd.org.ukindex.html

    It's not a guide to all the UK (unless Scotland was
    flattened overnight


    and

    Quoted message said:

    I didn't notice).


    I found this a while ago which may be of use....

    tinyurl.comyuzxo

    Quoted message said:

    The little bump on my way home from any kind of decent
    ride is a mere


    100m.

    Quoted message said:

    The 50 miler I did on Thursday was a bit hilly with a high
    point of 270m


    and

    Quoted message said:

    a low point of 44m (and included the local bump both
    ways.) This is just


    the

    Quoted message said:

    local 'ride from the house' stuff. Doesn't take much
    looking for.

    One of these days I might try a really hilly ride..

    I've done the Bealach na Ba - or to be more precise, it
    did me. Having said that, if you manage it, and keep
    going, the finest seafood to be had in Britain (IMO) can
    be bought in the Applecross Hotel - most of it "hand-
    picked" from the bay.

    E

  5. "Iain Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Been doing lots of thinking today about hills, and
    particularly cycling up them (aka "sado-masochism" in some
    cases). A few months back I saw a


    letter

    Quoted message said:

    in one of the mags, from someone asking for contributions
    to a list of Britain's "cols", as there's lists of
    Europe's cols but none for us. Does anyone know anything
    of this, and if anything's come of it? I've tried
    searching on Google but "britain cycling cols" is a bit
    too vague to


    search

    Quoted message said:

    on.

    Well, remember the 'col' is just the French word for a
    mountain pass, so a search on 'Britain' and 'mountain
    passes' might be more fruitful than 'cols'.

    Quoted message said:

    And for my second question - I've tried to find out what
    the UCI's rules are on grading climbs, from lowly 4th to
    mighty Hors, and discovered there's no set rules. I know
    none of our "cols" get anywhere near the altitudes of the
    Alps/Pyrenees, and very few get the distance, but some of
    the longer ones get towards the average gradients. How do
    Britain's cols rank in terms of these categories?

    Have a look at draco.acs.uci.edu5.3.html
    for rating information. For profiles of European cols, you
    could look at www.cyclingcols.com, and other links from
    there. Unfortunately it doesn't have anything about
    Britain's mountain passes. There was a site that did, url
    posted by someone on here a while back, but I've lost it
    (and would like to see it again if anyone knows it).

    Rich

  6. "Richard Goodman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    There was a site that did, url posted by someone on here
    a while back, but I've lost it (and would


    like

    Quoted message said:

    to see it again if anyone knows it).

    Ah, silly me. It was www.salite.ch, which is actually is
    linked from cyclingcols.com. 112 'hill' profiles listed for
    England alone! That should be enough to keep you busy.

    Rich

  7. This is the most comprehensive website for european climbs I've found so
    far:
    ciclismo.sitiasp.itmotore.aspx

    Only some 6300 or so to go.....

    Iain Jones said:

    Been doing lots of thinking today about hills, and
    particularly cycling up them (aka "sado-masochism" in some
    cases). A few months back I saw a letter in one of the
    mags, from someone asking for contributions to a list of
    Britain's "cols", as there's lists of Europe's cols but
    none for us. Does anyone know anything of this, and if
    anything's come of it? I've tried searching on Google but
    "britain cycling cols" is a bit too vague to search on.

    And for my second question - I've tried to find out what
    the UCI's rules are on grading climbs, from lowly 4th to
    mighty Hors, and discovered there's no set rules. I know
    none of our "cols" get anywhere near the altitudes of the
    Alps/Pyrenees, and very few get the distance, but some of
    the longer ones get towards the average gradients. How do
    Britain's cols rank in terms of these categories?

    And how the hell do they RACE up those gradients?! (you
    don't need to answer that one!)

  8. Thanks for all the info and the links, they're the kind of
    things I was after. The ones which showed the gradient
    profiles intrigued me though, eg. looking at the Hardknott
    Pass from Cockley Beck (not tried anything that steep yet,
    will be a while before I do), there's no mention of the
    infamous 33% gradient, the steepest it shows is ~15%.

  9. On 12/4/04 8:18 pm, in article
    [email hidden], "Iain Jones"

    Quoted message said:

    Thanks for all the info and the links, they're the kind of
    things I was after. The ones which showed the gradient
    profiles intrigued me though, eg. looking at the Hardknott
    Pass from Cockley Beck (not tried anything that steep yet,
    will be a while before I do), there's no mention of the
    infamous 33% gradient, the steepest it shows is ~15%.

    That is because it provides 500m averages rather than point
    averages. It's even steeper if you cut the corners on the
    hairpins (I have heard rumours of tandems doing endo's)

    ..d

  10. David Martin <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    On 12/4/04 8:18 pm, in article
    [email hidden], "Iain

    Jones said:

    Thanks for all the info and the links, they're the kind
    of things I was after. The ones which showed the gradient
    profiles intrigued me though, eg. looking at the
    Hardknott Pass from Cockley Beck (not tried anything that
    steep yet, will be a while before I do), there's no
    mention of the infamous 33% gradient, the steepest it
    shows is ~15%.

    That is because it provides 500m averages rather than
    point averages. It's even steeper if you cut the
    corners on the hairpins (I have heard rumours of
    tandems doing endo's)

    ..d

    Weren't there some pictures a couple of years back of a
    lorry that got stuck on the hairpins, someone told the
    driver he could get to Wasdale via the Hardknott?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.