Tiny penises and Oprah (also: Breasts are immunization devices (!))

"Todd Gastaldo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

TINY PENISES...AND OPRAH See below...

First this...

======================
I breast fed my son and he was only sick twice as a
youngster. No ear infections, no diarrhea, no nasty colds
and sore throats and at the age of 39 has only 4 fillings in
his beautiful white teeth. He was immunized against all the
diseases there were vaccines for. Never a bad reaction.

As for the size of his penis.... duh! I didn't see it once
he was old enough to bathe himself. :-)
--
Kim Colonics to clean out your stuffed up @$$ Of all the
toxic goodies you do not pass Globs of gunk and the mucus
you store Parasites, flukes and worms galore So take a
colonic so you can pass All these nasties from your
paracitized @$$..... The most amazing BS artists there are:
members.rogers.comindex.htmlOpen ↗
geocities.comQuackery.htmlOpen ↗
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This is why Immunotec Research sells HMS-90
(H)umanized (M)ilk (S)erium 90% protein They have replicated
mother's milk. 😉 and they have a medical patent that
proves it improves the immune system

Todd Gastaldo <[email hidden]> wrote in message ne-
ws:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

TINY PENISES...AND OPRAH See below...

First this...

Breasts are IMMUNIZATION devices!

In addition to IMMUNIZATIONS, breastmilk contains OTHER
protective factors...

Lars A. Hanson and colleagues say:

"[Breast]milk secretory IgA [IMMUNIZATIONS] stop microbes
already on the mucosa preventing infection, tissue
engagement and energy loss. In

addition,

Quoted message said:

the milk contains many protective factors such as
lactoferrin and oligosacharides functioning as analogues
for microbial receptors

preventing

Quoted message said:

mucosal attachment, the initial step of most infections.
As a result, breast-feeding significantly reduces the risk
of neonatal septicemia, respiratory tract infections,
otitis media, diarrhea, urinary tract infections, infection-
induced wheezing and necrotizing enterocolitis." --Lars A
Hanson et al.^^^ Pediatr Int. 2002 Aug;44(4):347-52.
PubMed abstract

^^^Hanson LA, Korotkova M, Haversen L, Mattsby-Baltzer I,
Hahn-Zoric M, Silfverdal SA, Strandvik B, Telemo E.
Department of Clinical Immunology, Goteborg University,
Goteborg, Sweden.

NOTE #1: I've substituted the power word IMMUNIZATION for
Hanson et al.'s word "antibody." Breastfeeding is
*passive* immunization: the mother

scans

Quoted message said:

for pathogens and manufactures specific antibodies which
she passes to her baby in breastmilk.

NOTE#2: Vaccinations are not technically immunizations.
Vaccinations are antigens which often stimulate immunity.
Breastfeeding reportedly makes vaccinations work better -
see below.

OTITIS MEDIA: BREASTFEEDING REDUCES RISK

Auinger et al. indicate that "early breastfeeding
termination" may be a

risk

Quoted message said:

factor for otitis media...

"After controlling for risk factors for [otitis media] OM,
the prevalence

of

Quoted message said:

OM from phase I to phase II increased from 66.7% to 69.7%...early-
onset OM increased from 41.1% to 45.8%...and repeated OM
increased from 34.8% to
41.1%...This observed increase corresponds to 561,000 and
720,000 more children having early-onset OM and
repeated OM, respectively. Child care use, early
breastfeeding termination, asthma, and access to
health care

did

Quoted message said:

not significantly increase from phase I to phase II. The
prevalence of early-onset OM and repeated OM was higher
for affluent children, but the greatest increase in
prevalence was among impoverished children...." ---Auinger
et al.^^^ [Pediatrics. 2003 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):514-20. PubMed
abstract]

^^^Auinger P, Lanphear BP, Kalkwarf HJ, Mansour ME.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School
of Medicine and Dentistry and

the

Quoted message said:

American Academy of Pediatrics Center for Child Health
Research,

Rochester,

Quoted message said:

New York 14620, USA. Copied to Auinger et al. via
[email hidden]

Whatever is causing the increase in otitis media, Auinger
et al.'s "early breastfeeding termination" risk factor
indicates that some cases of recurrent acute otitis media
may be being caused by MDs (and DOs) lying by omission
thereby denying massive numbers of children massive
numbers of

free

Quoted message said:

daily immunizations (breastfeedings).

WHAT WOMAN - explicitly informed that she can IMMUNIZE her
child daily -

is

Quoted message said:

going fail to at least ATTEMPT to give her baby free daily
immunizations that reportedly

make

Quoted message said:

MD-needle vaccinations work better!?

MDs are committing mass IMMUNOLOGIC child abuse - missing
a GOLDEN opportunity to make the immunization rate
skyrocket!

Per Brandtzaeg [2003]^^^ mentions otitis media in his
recent article on breastfeeding...

NOTE: Again, I'm substituting the word IMMUNIZATIONS for
the word "antibodies"...

"Lactating mammary glands are part of an integrated
mucosal immune system with local production of
IMMUNIZATIONS, mainly consisting of secretory
immunoglobulin A (SIgA). These IMMUNIZATIONS generally
reflect antigenic stimulation of mucosa-associated
lymphoid tissue (MALT) by common

intestinal

Quoted message said:

and respiratory pathogens. IMMUNIZATIONS in breast milk
are thus highly targeted against infectious agents in the
mother's environment, which are those likely to be
encountered by the infant shortly after birth.

Therefore,

Quoted message said:

breast-feeding represents an ingenious immunological
integration of mother and child. The mucosae are favored
as portals of entry by most infectious agents, and the
neonatal period is particularly critical in this respect.
Mucosal pathogens are a major killer of children below the
age of 5 years, being responsible for more than 14 million
deaths annually. Diarrheal disease alone claims a toll of
5 million children per year in the

developing

Quoted message said:

countries. Epidemiological data suggest that the risk of
dying from

diarrhea

Quoted message said:

could be reduced 14-24 times in breast-fed children. A
beneficial clinical effect is also apparent in the
industrialized world, even in relation to relatively
common diseases such as otitis media and acute lower

respiratory

Quoted message said:

tract infections." [Brandtzaeg P. Vaccine. 2003 Jul 28;21(24):3382-
8. PubMed abstract

^^^Per Brandtzaeg. Laboratory for Immunohistochemistry and
Immunopathology (LIIPAT), Institute of Pathology,
University of Oslo, Rikshospitalet,

N-0027

Quoted message said:

Oslo, Norway. Copied to Per via
[email hidden]

Sorry to repeat myself but... Again, ostensibly "pro-
immunization" MDs and DOs are lying by omission in droves
thereby denying massive numbers of preschool children
massive numbers of free

daily

Quoted message said:

immunizations.

It's mass IMMUNOLOGIC child abuse!

MATERNAL ANTIBODIES FOR PASSIVE INFANT IMMUNIZATION NIH
GUIDE, Volume 23, Number 40, November 18, 1994 RFA: AI-95-
004 grants.nih.govRFA AI 95Open ↗
004.html

As indicated above, reportedly, breastimmunizations make
MD-needle vaccinations work better!

Quoting Hanson and Telemo [1999]:

"The improved defense against infection in the breast-fed
infant is not just a matter of passive, temporary
protection. There is also a definite ACTIVE impact on the
breast-fed infant's immune system that makes it function
more efficiently in defense against infections and in
response to vaccines for years to come." [Hanson and
Telemo in Ogra et al. Mucosal

Im

Quoted message said:

munology 1999:1501, emphasis added]

In 2002, Hanson and Telemo (also quoted at the beginning
of this post) modified their "ACTIVE impact" statement as
follows (emphasis added):

"Via several mechanisms it SEEMS that human milk can
actively stimulate

the

Quoted message said:

immune system of the breast-fed infant. [If so, t]his
reduces the risk of infections like otitis media,
respiratory tract infections, diarrhea and infection-
induced wheezing for several years after the termination
of breast-feeding. Furthermore, it seems that breast-
feeding decreases the

risk

Quoted message said:

of attracting celiac disease and allergic diseases. The
latter has been

much

Quoted message said:

debated, but a recent critical review of published reports
gives good support for long-term protection of allergic
diseases, especially in high-risk children." [Hanson and
Telemo and colleagues. Pediatr Int. 2002 Aug;44(4):347-52.
PubMed abstract]

REGARDLESS whether human milk can ACTIVELY stimulate the
immune system of the breast-fed infant...

WHY are MDs failing to tell the world that breastfeeding
women are IMMUNIZERS who scan for pathogens and
manufacture specific IMMUNIZATIONS which they "inject"
with their breasts DAILY?

Why are MDs failing to tell the world that breast
immunizations reportedly make MD-needle-vaccinations work
better! (See Hanson and Telemo [1999;just quoted])?

Why are MDs failing to take a simple step (education)
which would make the breastfeeding/IMMUNIZATION rate
skyrocket!

Again...

WHAT WOMAN - explicitly informed that she can IMMUNIZE her
child daily -

is

Quoted message said:

going fail to at least ATTEMPT to give her baby free daily
immunizations that reportedly

make

Quoted message said:

MD-needle vaccinations work better!?

MDs are committing mass IMMUNOLOGIC child abuse!

See Breastfeeding = Chiropractic immunization! groups.yahoo.comchiroOpen ↗
list/message/2014

Mass PHYSICAL child abuse - MDs are knowingly closing
birth canals up to

30%

Quoted message said:

and aping a painful sacred Jewish religious ritual....

TINY PENISES...AND OPRAH...

When I pointed out in 1987 that MD-pediatricians were
using phony

neurology

Quoted message said:

to claim that babies can't feel pain during routine infant
circumcision, I asked Congress to create a religious
exemption from the child abuse laws

for

Quoted message said:

Jews.

The largest pediatric trade union - AAP - came out against
ALL religious exemptions - and suggested anonymity for
perpetrators of child abuse!

See Sen. Frist, infant penis care, dead babies - and AHRQ
'in-hospital safety events' groups.yahoo.comchiroOpen ↗
list/message/2019

See also: Johns Hopkins breast/vagina/penis power! (How
America can INSTANTLY save $200 million per year...) groups.yahoo.comchiroOpen ↗
list/message/2108

In 1988 - just months after I exposed American medicine's
phony babies can't feel pain neurology - routine infant
circumcision abruptly went from "no medical indication" to
"effective public health measure" (!) as the California
Medical Association overrode (ignored) its own Scientific
Board by voice vote!

NO CIRC is actually MAYBE CIRC...

Also interesting: Nurse Marilyn Milos of the National
Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers
(NO CIRC) went from saying

"Child

Quoted message said:

Abuse Begins With Circumcision" on bumper stickers (and
telling me she would be organizing en masse nurse
reporting) - to saying she couldn't

think

Quoted message said:

of any circumcisions to report! (I pointed out that she
could report using the NO CIRC video of a circumcision.)

Nurse Milos actually runs MAYBE CIRC - i.e. - Nurse Milos
MAY be against routine infant circumcision - but ONLY if
MDs can continue to do it!

Subsequent to telling me that she couldn't think of any
routine infant circumcisions to report...

Nurse Milos and the NO CIRC Board in effect VOTED FOR
CHILD ABUSE - that is - the NO CIRC Board voted to expel a
NO CIRC Board Member who made her continued service on the
NO CIRC Board contingent on NO CIRC nurses simply
complying with Calif. Penal Law and filing MANDATORY
Suspected Child Abuse Reports. (Remember, Nurse Milos very
publicly suspected child abuse with

her

Quoted message said:

"Child Abuse Begins With Circumcision" bumper stickers.)

I told Oprah about this - but I guess she either didn't
see my email - or she doesn't think a show about mass
child abuse by MDs would be interesting - or she doesn't
think it would bring in commercial

advertising

Quoted message said:

revenue...

See Oprah and grisly 'hazing' of babies at UCLA... groups.yahoo.comchiroOpen ↗
list/message/2354

(Oprah could help end mass infant screams and save America
$200 million

per

Quoted message said:

year - and (paradoxically) PRESERVE the foreskin removal
as a CHOICE American males could make for themselves in
adulthood.)

MDs and DOs: DANGEROUS IMMUNOLOGIC NEGLIGENCE...

In addition to failing to disclose that they are lying by
omission thereby denying massive numbers of babies massive
numbers of free daily immunizations...

MDs and DOs are failing to make up to 99% of the necessary
reports to establish VACCINE safety and MEDICATION
safety...

Meanwhile they are committing obvious Exclusion Day
vaccination fraud...

See No shots, no school? BALONEY! groups.yahoo.comchiroOpen ↗
list/message/1795

MDs and DOs must END Exclusion Day vaccination fraud. MDs
and DOs and schools must tell ALL parents - not just
parents who ask about vaccination exemption - that ALL
children will be sent home/protected during disease
outbreaks.

Since no one knows which vaccinated children are not
immunized by their vaccinations, during disease outbreaks,
we must protect (send home) ALL children - including
VACCINATED and vaccinated-but-not-immunized children - and
not just vaccine-exempt children.

NOTE: I am NOT opposed to vaccinations. I am ADAMANTLY IN
FAVOR of vaccinations - as long as parents are
truly informed of vaccination

risks -

Quoted message said:

and given TRUE CHOICE.

See VACCINATION SUBLUXATION! (Thimerosal: Sen Frist
subluxating VICA) groups.yahoo.comchiroOpen ↗
list/message/2156

Much of the text above was taken from my post, "Awesome
breasts! OBs

causing

Quoted message said:

otitis media? (also: 'Osteopathic' v. 'Chiropractic'
manipulation)" groups.yahoo.comchiroOpen ↗
list/message/2159

Thanks for reading everyone,

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo [email hidden]

This post will be instantly archived for global access at:
groups.yahoo.com2395Open ↗

Within 24 hours it will be in the google archive. Search
groups.google.comgroups.google.comOpen ↗ for "Tiny penises and Oprah
(also: Breasts are immunization devices (!)"

In article <[email hidden]>,

You Ask said:

This is why Immunotec Research sells HMS-90
(H)umanized (M)ilk (S)erium 90% protein They have
replicated mother's milk. 😉 and they have a medical
patent that proves it improves the immune system

Having a patent on something does NOT prove that it works.

That's a popular misconception.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were
standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

David Wright <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <Rjgbc.2487$%%1.16423@newscontent-

01.sprint.ca said:

This is why Immunotec Research sells HMS-90
(H)umanized (M)ilk (S)erium 90% protein They have
replicated mother's milk. 😉 and they have a medical
patent that proves it improves the immune

system

Quoted message said:

Having a patent on something does NOT prove that it works.

That's a popular misconception.

A medical patent does have to state the claim and prove
it. Food patents don't. Immunotec Research Ltd. has
medical patents

Quoted message said:

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

In article <[email hidden]>,

You Ask said:

David Wright <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <Rjgbc.2487$%%1.16423@newscontent-

01.sprint.ca said:

This is why Immunotec Research sells HMS-90
(H)umanized (M)ilk (S)erium 90% protein They have
replicated mother's milk. 😉 and they have a medical
patent that proves it improves the immune system

Having a patent on something does NOT prove that it
works.

That's a popular misconception.

A medical patent does have to state the claim and prove it.

Wrong. At least in the United States, the *only* thing that
you can't patent without demonstrating it works is a
perpetual motion machine.

Quoted message said:

Food patents don't. Immunotec Research Ltd. has
medical patents

Whoopee.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were
standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

David Wright <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Immunotec Research Ltd. has medical patents

Whoopee.

ignorance is bliss enjoy your life

In article <[email hidden]>,

You Ask said:

David Wright <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Immunotec Research Ltd. has medical patents

Whoopee.

ignorance is bliss

Then you must be a very happy person.

Quoted message said:

enjoy your life

I do. Correcting the misapprehensions of people like you is
one of the small pleasures. I suspect you've confused
patenting something with getting FDA approval for it (which
*does* require proof of efficacy, unlike a patent).

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were
standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

David Wright <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Whoopee.

ignorance is bliss

Then you must be a very happy person.

Quoted message said:

enjoy your life

I do. Correcting the misapprehensions of people like you
is one of the small pleasures. I suspect you've confused
patenting something with getting FDA approval for it
(which *does* require proof of efficacy, unlike a patent).

medical patents require that that has been done years ago
negativity is no substitute for ignorance

In article <[email hidden]>,

You Ask said:

David Wright <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>
> Whoopee.
>
ignorance is bliss

Then you must be a very happy person.

Quoted message said:

enjoy your life

I do. Correcting the misapprehensions of people like you
is one of the small pleasures. I suspect you've confused
patenting something with getting FDA approval for it
(which *does* require proof of efficacy, unlike a
patent).

medical patents require that that has been done years ago
negativity is no substitute for ignorance

Let's be a bit more precise here. The degree of proof of
efficacy is up to the whims of the Patent and Trademark
Office, which often does a rather poor job (that's why
several perpetual motion machine patents managed to slide
by). In vitro studies might sometimes be accepted.

FDA approval generally has far more stringent criteria.

So, as I was saying, a medical patent is not proof that
something works.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were
standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

David Wright <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

>>
>ignorance is bliss

Then you must be a very happy person.

>enjoy your life

I do. Correcting the misapprehensions of people like
you is one of the small pleasures. I suspect you've
confused patenting something with getting FDA approval
for it (which *does* require proof of efficacy, unlike
a patent).

medical patents require that that has been done years ago
negativity is no substitute for ignorance

Let's be a bit more precise here. The degree of proof of
efficacy is up to the whims of the Patent and Trademark
Office, which often does a rather poor job (that's why
several perpetual motion machine patents managed to slide
by). In vitro studies might sometimes be accepted.

invivo (human) studies are better than animal studies

In article <[email hidden]>,

Are You Experienced said:

David Wright <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

> >>
> >ignorance is bliss
>
> Then you must be a very happy person.
>
> >enjoy your life
>
> I do. Correcting the misapprehensions of people like
> you is one of the small pleasures. I suspect you've
> confused patenting something with getting FDA approval
> for it (which *does* require proof of efficacy, unlike
> a patent).
>
medical patents require that that has been done years
ago negativity is no substitute for ignorance

Let's be a bit more precise here. The degree of proof of
efficacy is up to the whims of the Patent and Trademark
Office, which often does a rather poor job (that's why
several perpetual motion machine patents managed to slide
by). In vitro studies might sometimes be accepted.

invivo (human) studies are better than animal studies

I'm aware of that. It's also competely irrelevant to the
point I was making.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
have not seen as far as others, it is because giants were
standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)