Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

full-suspension single-speed

Started by Paul Southworth · · Last activity · 12 posts · 2,131 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
14 March 2003
Last activity
15 March 2003
Original author
Paul Southworth
Posts
12
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,131
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–12 of 12
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Are there any full-suspension frames that do not hinge between the chain stays and the bottom
    bracket? I'm wondering if there are FS frames out there that can be used as single speeds without
    something to take up chain slack when the suspension is moving. I am not talking about a Moots or
    KHS style pivotless elastomer suspension system - it needs to be more travel than that.

  2. Paul Southworth said:

    Are there any full-suspension frames that do not hinge between the chain stays and the bottom
    bracket? I'm wondering if there are FS frames out there that can be used as single speeds without
    something to take up chain slack when the suspension is moving. I am not talking about a Moots or
    KHS style pivotless elastomer suspension system - it needs to be more travel than that.

    You might try one of those old unified rear triangle bikes, like the Trek Y. They were all the rage
    a few years ago. Almost every big bike company had their own version.

    Matt O.

  3. RE/

    Quoted message said:

    Are there any full-suspension frames that do not hinge between the chain stays and the bottom
    bracket? I'm wondering if there are FS frames out there that can be used as single speeds without
    something to take up chain slack when the suspension is moving.

    Yes, but I can't remember the maker's name.

    It was a widly-known name and the bike was designed specifically as a single-speed FS; pivoting at
    the BB shell.

    Somebody else will probably have a URL for it...
    -----------------------
    PeteCresswell

  4. On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 19:46:51 +0000, Paul Southworth did issue forth:

    Quoted message said:

    Are there any full-suspension frames that do not hinge between the chain stays and the bottom
    bracket? I'm wondering if there are FS frames out there that can be used as single speeds without
    something to take up chain slack when the suspension is moving. I am not talking about a Moots or
    KHS style pivotless elastomer suspension system - it needs to be more travel than that.

    Yes, Kona have launched a susser specifically designed for singlespeed. Can't remember the name
    though. It'll probably be something like the "Kona Pingpingping f'tang moo" or whatever the Kona
    random-sound generator came out with that week.

    --
    Huw Pritchard Replace bounce with huw to reply by mail

  5. Paul Southworth said:

    Are there any full-suspension frames that do not hinge between the chain stays and the bottom
    bracket? I'm wondering if there are FS frames out there that can be used as single speeds without
    something to take up chain slack when the suspension is moving. I am not talking about a Moots or
    KHS style pivotless elastomer suspension system - it needs to be more travel than that.

    Here's Rick Hunter's original take on the problem:

    huntercycles.comcouch.html

  6. (Paul Southworth) said:

    Are there any full-suspension frames that do not hinge between the chain stays and the bottom
    bracket? I'm wondering if there are FS frames out there that can be used as single speeds without
    something to take up chain slack when the suspension is moving. I am not talking about a Moots or
    KHS style pivotless elastomer suspension system - it needs to be more travel than that.

    konaworld.com2k3 a.cfm

  7. (Paul Southworth) said:

    Are there any full-suspension frames that do not hinge between the chain stays and the bottom
    bracket? I'm wondering if there are FS frames out there that can be used as single speeds without
    something to take up chain slack when the suspension is moving. I am not talking about a Moots or
    KHS style pivotless elastomer suspension system - it needs to be more travel than that.

    Any URT or any single pivot with the swingarm pivoting around the BB axis will do it. Somebody over
    here (UK) has a BSX/4X frame with about 4" travel, a concentric swingarm pivot and horizontal
    dropouts, but I can't remember who! However, if BSX gets popular, expect other manufacturers to
    follow suit. A quick google revealed mojowheels.comlenz.html with concentric frames for
    all disciplines but vertical dropouts make singlespeed chain tension a bit hit and miss; you'd need
    a fixed tensioner jockey wheel or one of those eccentric rear hub axles.

    Kinky Cowboy

    *Your milage may vary Batteries not included May contain traces of nuts.

  8. RE/

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, Kona have launched a susser specifically designed for singlespeed. Can't remember the
    name though.

    konaworld.comkw index.cfm

    Click on "Two single speed rigs!"
    -----------------------
    PeteCresswell

  9. Have a look in a museum. Full-suspension was very popular before the invention of pneumatic (ie
    air-filled) tires.

  10. "Paul Southworth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Are there any full-suspension frames that do not hinge between the chain stays and the bottom
    bracket? I'm wondering if there are FS frames out there that can be used as single speeds without
    something to take up chain slack when the suspension is moving. I am not talking about a Moots or
    KHS style pivotless elastomer suspension system - it needs to be more travel than that.

    There was a Merlin which used the flex of the chainstays as the shock absorber. It was welded all
    together except for a shock unit between the seatstay bridge and the seat cluster. That would be
    doable as a single speed bike if you can find one. Pretty neat design as it was very light and
    avoided the sloppy sleeves of other designs. (But I am no MTB expert.)
    --
    Andrew Muzi yellowjersey.orgyellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April 1971

  11. Doesn't anyone find a full-suspension single speed bike to be a bit of an oxymoron? I thought the
    whole point of a single speed mountain bike was simplicity.

    Russell

  12. (Russell) said:

    Doesn't anyone find a full-suspension single speed bike to be a bit of an oxymoron? I thought the
    whole point of a single speed mountain bike was simplicity.

    Russell

    Not necessarily; some people like singlespeed because the derailleur system is prone to mud clogging
    or crash damage; neither problem need affect your suspension. I don't need rear suspension on my
    singlespeed, but I do need it to be mudproof so it has disc brakes, another thing the luddite
    tendency frowns upon.

    Kinky Cowboy

    *Your milage may vary Batteries not included May contain traces of nuts.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.