So I’ve been riding some of the trails in the foothills of
the Rockies lately, and I feel like I’m getting a great feel
for the downhills, and taking some knarly lines, but I’m a
bit stymied by the uphills. The main problem is that these
trails go up, up, up, up, up ,up, and then you turn around
and go down, down, down, and the ups are giving me hell
(they’re about a 1000’ rise in about 2.5 miles). It’s not
all because of technique, because I can ride some pretty
nasty ups, but since it just keeps going up and up, my legs
and my lungs just won’t hold out. If I could get a break
with a down or straight in between, I’d be OK, but it’s just
up, up, up.
So I stopped to look at how the b*kers were getting up and
realized that they’re using gear ratios less than 1:1, cause
their cranks are turning like 3 times for each turn of the
wheel, and I thought, hell, I would be OK if I could gear
down like that. Well, I can’t until Harper gets his ass in
gear on Redshift, but it made me wonder what I could do to
effectively gear down. I know refining my technique will
help, and I’m working on that and my leg strength and
endurance, but a mechanical advantage would be a nice
shortcut in the meantime. 😉
Firstly, I’m on a 26”x3” wheel. I went with 26” cause I
figured I’d be riding more for XC than trials, but now I
wonder, how much of an advantage would I gain on the ups if
I was using a 24” wheel. Not in terms of maneuverability,
but in sheer climbing advantage.
Next I wondered about my cranks, which are 170s. I could try
175s. Would this give me much climbing advantage? How about
a 24” with 175s
vs. my 26” with 170s. Anybody have any experience climbing
long, strenuous hills with some different setups?
Thanks,
Andy
--
quark soup - uni on...
quark soup
"...and from this expansion of space was formed a highly energetic soup
of particles and antiparticles."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
quark soup's Profile: unicyclist.com5417Open ↗
View this thread: unicyclist.com31168Open ↗