Road Cycling · Public discussion

Shorter riders

Started by Jim Boyer · · Last activity · 6 posts · 989 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
29 March 2004
Last activity
2 April 2004
Original author
Jim Boyer
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
989
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Shorter riders may sometimes have to compromise and go with
    650C wheels instead of 700C to accommodate the smaller frame
    or avoid toe-wheel contact. What is the performance
    difference with the smaller wheel?

    Is it true that compact frames can accommodate a smaller
    rider with the larger 700C wheel? If so, would it be better
    to go with the compact frame to have the larger wheel?

    Thanks for any info.

    jb

  2. "Jim Boyer" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Is it true that compact frames can accommodate a
    smaller rider with the larger 700C wheel? If so, would
    it be better to go with the compact frame to have the
    larger wheel?

    A compact frame gives you more standover clearance, but they
    still have the same top tube length as a standard geometry
    bike. If you have short legs and a long torso, then compact
    geometry is perfect for you. If you have a short torso,
    compact geometry isn't going to help. 650 wheels allow for a
    shorter top tube.

  3. Jim Boyer said:

    Is it true that compact frames can accommodate a smaller
    rider with the larger 700C wheel? If so, would it be better
    to go with the compact frame to have the larger wheel?

    Thanks for any info.

    jb

    Terry bicycles used 700c wheels on frames targeted to women
    about 5'5" and taller and substituted a smaller front wheel
    for those that were shorter. These were targeted toward
    women, so their frames and wheels were designed aroung lnger
    legs/shorter torsos.

    My wife rode a Fuji with a smaller front wheel and a Terry
    with double 700c and she didn't really see much difference.
    We bought tires and tubes for the season and you can make a
    regular tube fit fine in a smaller tire (takes a moment to
    telescope the tubing down on the side opposite the valve) if
    you can't get the smaller tube size - mostly an issue on
    road bikes with 20c-25c tubes.

    Curtis L. Russell Odenton, MD (USA) Just someone on
    two wheels...

  4. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Ken
    "Jim Boyer" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Is it true that compact frames can accommodate a
    smaller rider with the larger 700C wheel? If so, would
    it be better to go with the compact frame to have the
    larger wheel?



    A compact frame gives you more standover clearance, but they
    still have the same top tube length as a standard geometry
    bike. If you have short legs and a long torso, then compact
    geometry is perfect for you. If you have a short torso,
    compact geometry isn't going to help. 650 wheels allow for a
    shorter top tube.

    There could still be issues with handlebar position for a short person on a compact frame since head tubes can be made only so small. A 650C-wheeled bike can allows the handlebars to be about 2.5cm lower.

    Also, toe overlap is much less of an issue with 650C wheels.

  5. Quoted message said:

    What is the performance difference with the smaller wheel?

    I would have to venture that any performance difference is
    too small to be measurable.

    650C wheels have been widely used on time trial bikes to
    help achieve optimum positioning of the rider.

    My wife's bike has 650C wheels and the only disadvantage we
    have encountered is the lower top-end gear with conventional
    chainrings and cogsets (53T x 12T).

    Chris Neary

  6. "Jim Boyer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Shorter riders may sometimes have to compromise and go
    with 650C wheels instead of 700C to accommodate the
    smaller frame or avoid toe-wheel


    contact.

    Quoted message said:

    What is the performance difference with the smaller wheel?

    I'm 5'6 and ride a 50cm Schwinn Peloton. I haven't had any
    problem with toe-wheel contact, except when turning
    extremely sharp at very low speed. You just learn to keep
    your toe away from the wheel. I see that Surly is building
    a full-on touring bike, and they're speccing 26 inchers
    for every frame size below 56cm, so there may be something
    to it.....

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.