Power meters · Public discussion

off-road power measurement

Started by scottmoroschan · · Last activity · 4 posts · 2,205 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Power meters
Published
25 March 2004
Last activity
29 March 2004
Original author
scottmoroschan
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,205
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hello everybody,

    I just wanted to ask whether or not anybody has had positive experiences with using either power tap or SRM devices while mountain biking or during cyclocross races. Basically, I am considering conducting a research project that would involve using a SRM device off-road.

    Hopefully, a few people will be able to provide me with some praticle real-life advice on the pros and cons of such use.

    Thanks,

    Scott

  2. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by scottmoroschan
    Hello everybody,

    I just wanted to ask whether or not anybody has had positive experiences with using either power tap or SRM devices while mountain biking or during cyclocross races. Basically, I am considering conducting a research project that would involve using a SRM device off-road.

    Hopefully, a few people will be able to provide me with some praticle real-life advice on the pros and cons of such use.

    Thanks,

    Scott

    one of the pros i coach uses a PT for MTBing training and racing. They've no out of the ordinary issues.

    i vaguely seem to recall about some issue with a triple ring, and an SRM, but not 100% certain

    cheers
    ric

  3. There are two issues w/ regards to the mountain bike/triple ring version of the SRM:

    1) the distance from the sensor to the inner face of the powermeter (crank) is greater, meaning that you have to increase the strength of the magnet in (of) the sensor so that the powermeter will "wake up".

    2) more importantly, the inner chainring is significantly off-center with respect to the plane of the powermeter, i.e., when looking down the granny ring is offset towards the centerline of the bike. This can causes problems with calibration/power calculation, since the sensitivity of the strain gages to such off-axis torques may be different as a result. Unfortunately, I cannot tell you the magnitude of the possible error, only that I've heard about it. (I can say that my SRM Pro road crank shows a systematic ~2% variation in slope factor, depending on the chainline.)

    If maximum accuracy is needed, you might be able to back-calculate the rider's gearing from their speed and cadence, and then apply a chainring-specific correction factor to the data as reported by the SRM.

  4. Thanks for the feedback !!!

    Take care,

    Scott

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.