General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

waterless cookware

Started by Dave Rasmussen · · Last activity · 8 posts · 1,416 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
19 March 2004
Last activity
23 March 2004
Original author
Dave Rasmussen
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,416
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I recently started reading a little about these waterless
    steam cookware items. Alot of times now when I sort of
    steam/boil brocolli and such I keep the liquid for soup or
    something. I've never used a pressure cooker. So I was
    wondering the other day with my brisquet if I would have
    been ahead with a pressure cooker or these newfangled
    waterless cookware devices?

    As for oil in the pan, I usually cook with olive oil and not
    much. I pour fat off other things before I eat.

  2. "Dave Rasmussen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    I recently started reading a little about these waterless
    steam cookware items. Alot of times now when I sort of
    steam/boil brocolli and such I


    keep

    Quoted message said:

    the liquid for soup or something. I've never used a
    pressure cooker. So I was wondering the other day with my
    brisquet if I would have been ahead with a pressure cooker
    or these newfangled waterless cookware devices?

    As for oil in the pan, I usually cook with olive oil and
    not much. I pour fat off other things before I eat.

    There really isn't anything special about the so-called
    "waterless" cookware. You can use the same method with any
    reasonably heavy cookware. A pressure cooker is another
    matter. I use mine pretty frequently. You can turn a pretty
    tough cut of meat into a fork-tender cut in 45 minutes.
    These are completely different animals. The waterless
    cookware is a gimmick that is often sold by high pressure
    sales people for thousands of dollars and offers nothing
    you can't get with good tri-ply or equivalent. A pressure
    cooker is a proven way of cooking that uses water that
    turns into super heated steam under pressure. You can get
    entry level pressure cookers for under $50 and more
    advanced models for $150 and up. I would recommend getting
    pressure cooker. You can use it to make stock and soup, for
    large batches of brown rice, pot roasts, and if it is large
    enough, for canning.

  3. You can purchase a very good set of "waterless" cookware on eBay. Do a
    search for "5-ply" stainless steel. I've owned a sets for about 5 years
    now. Thier real claim to fame is that the multi-ply layering of stainless
    steel and aluminum make them conduct heat very well throughout the entire
    pan. You can cook with a much lower heat setting. Good luck with whatever
    you decide.
    "Dave Rasmussen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    I recently started reading a little about these waterless
    steam cookware items. Alot of times now when I sort of
    steam/boil brocolli and such I


    keep

    Quoted message said:

    the liquid for soup or something. I've never used a
    pressure cooker. So I was wondering the other day with my
    brisquet if I would have been ahead with a pressure cooker
    or these newfangled waterless cookware devices?

    As for oil in the pan, I usually cook with olive oil and
    not much. I pour fat off other things before I eat.

  4. LET said:

    You can purchase a very good set of "waterless" cookware
    on eBay. Do a search for "5-ply" stainless steel. I've
    owned a sets for about 5 years now. Thier real claim to
    fame is that the multi-ply layering of stainless steel and
    aluminum make them conduct heat very well throughout the
    entire pan. You can cook with a much lower heat setting.
    Good luck with whatever

    5 ply is a joke. what are the ply's how thin are they? all
    there is to make ply's for the most part is SS aluminum
    and copper.

    --
    Knight-Toolworks & Custom Planes Custom made wooden planes
    at reasonable prices See knight-toolworks.comknight-toolworks.com For
    prices and ordering instructions.

  5. Dave Rasmussen said:


    I recently started reading a little about these waterless
    steam cookware items. Alot of times now when I sort of
    steam/boil brocolli and such I keep the liquid for soup or
    something....

    Waterless cookware is a total scam. It does absolutely
    nothing any other cookware can't do. Save your money and buy
    some good cookware or maybe a pressure cooker.

    nb

  6. I agree that the "state fair" prices represent a scam, but then I only paid
    $135 for a complete set. We've been using them for several years. I stand
    by my earlier judgement.
    "notbob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:8OI6c.40191$JL2.459702@attbi_s03...

    Quoted message said:
    Dave Rasmussen said:


    I recently started reading a little about these
    waterless steam cookware items. Alot of times now when I
    sort of steam/boil brocolli and such I


    keep

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the liquid for soup or something....

    Waterless cookware is a total scam. It does absolutely
    nothing any other cookware can't do. Save your money and
    buy some good cookware or maybe a pressure cooker.

    nb

  7. LET said:
    notbob said:

    Waterless cookware is a total scam. It does absolutely
    nothing any other cookware can't do.

    Not quite. It takes very good quality cookware to pull off
    waterless cooking, so it does eliminate all low quality
    products. It also takes a good sealing cover, so it
    eliminates all products with poor covers.

    That still leaves almost any top quality cookware being
    capable of waterless cooking.

    Waterless cooking itself is far more work without tasting
    far better, so doing it is a marketing gimic. It actually
    displays that fact that your cookware is perhaps in the
    top third of the products out on the market but folks
    who've never seen it done will think it eliminates far
    more than that.

    Quoted message said:

    I agree that the "state fair" prices represent a scam, but
    then I only paid $135 for a complete set. We've been using
    them for several years.

    Faire prices are always higher for everything, but I've
    never seen them elsewhere. One brand is West Bend, so I
    tried www.westbend.com and they only list gadgets like
    electric skillets, mass market stuff.

    Where have folks purchased waterless cookware other then
    fairs? Are there sources other than Ebay? I bought some at a
    fair in my first marriage and the last time I saw them they
    still looked like new even having spent most of a decade
    cycling through the dishwasher. I miss them.

  8. Doug Freyburger said:

    Where have folks purchased waterless cookware other then
    fairs? Are there sources other than Ebay? I bought some at
    a fair in my first marriage and the last time I saw them
    they still looked like new even having spent most of a
    decade cycling through the dishwasher. I miss them.

    I have seen waterless cookware advertised on an infomercial.
    The produce looked like junk. The same waterless cookware is
    available at those stores in malls that sell TV products.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.