UK and Europe · Public discussion

Saddle Angles

Started by Ian G Batten · · Last activity · 13 posts · 666 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
16 March 2004
Last activity
20 March 2004
Original author
Ian G Batten
Posts
13
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
666
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–13 of 13
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Suspecting that I needed to be able to lean forward a little
    more, and also wanting more of my weight going through my
    sit bones and less through my, er, ``soft tissue'', I
    shifted my saddle 15mm back on the rail and tilted it down a
    couple of grooves, then raised the post a bit. Yes, yes, I
    know I should only change one variable at a time, but life's
    too short.

    End result: I can pedal at least a gear higher at the same
    cadence and I chopped another five or ten minutes off the
    trip to the office. Is saddle position _really_ that
    critical? It does seem so...

    ian

  2. <snip>

    Quoted message said:

    End result: I can pedal at least a gear higher at the same
    cadence and I chopped another five or ten minutes off the
    trip to the office. Is saddle position _really_ that
    critical? It does seem so...

    Yes. But you can take it to extremes. I once a friends bike
    while we test rode another. His saddle position at the time
    could only be described as "aggressive". There was no
    discernible difference between sitting in the saddle and
    climbing out to sprint. Fine for short hops, not much cop
    for distance. He has now calmed it down a touch or two.

    If you ride the same route every day and have found a major
    difference in cycling came from these adjustments, try
    making small changes (One thing at a time!) every day or so
    and comparing the experience. When making any change makes
    the ride worse, you've got it licked. Try and get someone to
    photograph the setup (Preferably while you're riding) so
    that if / when you change your bike you get quickly get back
    to a good posture.

    Jon

  3. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Ian G Batten
    Suspecting that I needed to be able to lean forward a little more, and also wanting more of my weight going through my sit bones and less through my, er, ``soft tissue'', I shifted my saddle 15mm back on the rail and tilted it down a couple of grooves, then raised the post a bit. Yes, yes, I know I should only change one variable at a time, but life's too short.

    End result: I can pedal at least a gear higher at the same cadence and I chopped another five or ten minutes off the trip to the office. Is saddle position _really_ that critical? It does seem so...

    ian

    I too have experimented with saddle position, and I reckon it is slightly different on each of my three bikes, probably reflecting their different characteristics. However, the biggest single difference I noted was when I moved the saddle back on the rails by about 15mm and made sure that the saddle itself was parallel to the ground - made a big difference in my ability to climb whilst seated and extended the amount of time I can stay in the saddle before "the family jewels" go numb.

    I'm thinking of getting myself a SaddleCo Flow saddle, but so far haven't managed to find a UK distributor. Anyone know where I can get a hold of this from a UK supplier?

  4. I'm so sad that I read the subject here as "Saddle Angels"
    and started to think what shiny new accessory it was.

    My first thought was a cable device to stop the saddle being
    stolen, but I've got one of those already.

    Just for fun then, what would Saddle Angels be?

  5. On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:18:01 +0000, John Hearns <[email hidden]>

    () said:

    I'm so sad that I read the subject here as "Saddle Angels"
    and started to think what shiny new accessory it was.

    My first thought was a cable device to stop the saddle
    being stolen, but I've got one of those already.

    Just for fun then, what would Saddle Angels be?

    Emergency call-out teams for the saddle-sore, ready with
    helpful advice, padded shorts, soothing nostrums and the out
    of hours numbers of reputable 'bentmongers.

    ;-)

    --
    Matt K Dunedin, NZ

  6. "Ian G Batten" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Suspecting that I needed to be able to lean forward a
    little more, and also wanting more of my weight going
    through my sit bones and less through my, er, ``soft
    tissue'', I shifted my saddle 15mm back on the rail and
    tilted it down a couple of grooves, then raised the post a
    bit. Yes, yes, I know I should only change one variable at
    a time, but life's too short.

    End result: I can pedal at least a gear higher at the same
    cadence and I chopped another five or ten minutes off the
    trip to the office. Is saddle position _really_ that
    critical? It does seem so...

    I guess if it was badly wrong before such a difference
    might be made!

    Talking of saddle angles, twice recently I've seen parked
    bikes with the saddle mounted at about 45 degrees to the
    side and pointing slightly down - completely weird. The
    first one I saw I thought might just be loose and that
    perhaps the rider at least swings it to a more central
    position when riding, but when I saw the second one like
    that, just out of curosity I got hold of the saddle to see
    if it was loose, and it was actually mounted firmly - and
    therefore deliberately - like that. Strange how some people
    ride their bikes!

    Rich

  7. Quoted message said:

    I'm so sad that I read the subject here as "Saddle Angels"

    You weren't the only one who read "angels" - ;-)

    Quoted message said:

    Just for fun then, what would Saddle Angels be?

    For me it's my Terry's Liberator TiLite saddle :-)

    Cheers, helen s

    --This is an invalid email address to avoid spam-- to get
    correct one remove dependency on fame & fortune h*$el*$$e**-
    nd***$o$ts***i*$*$m**m$$o*n**s@$*$a$$o**l.c**$*$om$$

  8. dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers said:


    Quoted message said:

    I'm so sad that I read the subject here as "Saddle
    Angels"

    You weren't the only one who read "angels" - ;-)

    Quoted message said:

    Just for fun then, what would Saddle Angels be?

    For me it's my Terry's Liberator TiLite saddle :-)

    Have you thought about one of these (vibrating saddle)?

    appft1.uspto.govnph
    Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/search-
    bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=turudich&OS=turudi-
    ch&RS=turudich

    John B

  9. Matt said:

    Emergency call-out teams for the saddle-sore, ready with helpful advice, padded shorts, soothing nostrums and the out of hours numbers of reputable 'bentmongers.

    ...and preferably looking a bit like Charlies Angels too.

    I could probably do with a visit from the Saddle Angels at the moment - I'm in the process of breaking in a new Brooks B17...

    d.

  10. On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:47:03 GMT, davek
    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    <[email hidden]>:

    Quoted message said:

    I'm in the process of breaking in a new Brooks B17...

    ITYM a new Brooks B17 is in the process of breaking your
    [censored] in...

    --
    Guy
    ===
    May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after
    posting. chapmancentral.co.ukchapmancentral.co.uk

    88% of helmet statistics are made up, 65% of them at
    Washington University

  11. "davek" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I could probably do with a visit from the Saddle Angels at
    the moment - I'm in the process of breaking in a new
    Brooks B17...

    I was under the impression that one didn't break in a
    leather saddle. I thought they broke in the rider!

    Jon

  12. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Jon Senior
    [BI was under the impression that one didn't break in a leather saddle. I thought they broke in the rider!

    Jon [/B]

    Correect, the saddle breaks all the nerves in your [censored] so that after a certain period you no longer feel pain and discomfort. You kid yourself that your saddle has been "broken in" when in fact it's just your backside that's been bust!

  13. Guy said:

    ITYM a new Brooks B17 is in the process of breaking your
    [censored] in...

    Indeed. I've done about 120 miles on it so far and still no
    sign of 'give' despite frequent and liberal applications of
    Proofide. But it's not all bad news - my friends love the
    John Wayne impression.

    d.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.