Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Component Weights

Started by Alan E · · Last activity · 9 posts · 1,061 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
16 March 2004
Last activity
17 March 2004
Original author
Alan E
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,061
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Is there a database available that provides wieghts of bike
    components. When I look at various catalogs, there are often
    discrepencies from one source to another. Just as an
    example, for a Reynold Ouzo Pro 1 1/8 " fork, Excel has the
    weight as 406 gm, Colorado Cyclist has it at 425 gm, and
    Performance has it at 420. Prices, of course, are identical.
    Discrepencies abound for other components also.

    Thanks

  2. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Alan E
    Is there a database available that provides wieghts of bike
    components. When I look at various catalogs, there are often
    discrepencies from one source to another. Just as an
    example, for a Reynold Ouzo Pro 1 1/8 " fork, Excel has the
    weight as 406 gm, Colorado Cyclist has it at 425 gm, and
    Performance has it at 420. Prices, of course, are identical.
    Discrepencies abound for other components also.

    Thanks

    Try this site:

    http://weightweenies.starbike.com/listings.php

  3. On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:47:10 -0500, "Alan E" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Is there a database available that provides wieghts of bike
    components. When I look at various catalogs, there are
    often discrepencies from one source to another. Just as an
    example, for a Reynold Ouzo Pro 1 1/8 " fork, Excel has the
    weight as 406 gm, Colorado Cyclist has it at 425 gm, and
    Performance has it at 420. Prices, of course, are
    identical. Discrepencies abound for other components also.

    Thanks

    weightweenies.starbike.comweightweenies.starbike.com Kinky Cowboy*

    *Batteries not included May contain traces of nuts Your
    milage may vary

  4. "Alan E" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Is there a database available that provides wieghts of
    bike components. When I look at various catalogs, there
    are often discrepencies from one source to another. Just
    as an example, for a Reynold Ouzo Pro 1 1/8 " fork, Excel
    has the weight as 406 gm, Colorado Cyclist has it at 425
    gm, and Performance has it at 420. Prices, of course, are
    identical. Discrepencies abound for other components also.

    Thanks

    Mr. Damon Rinard's database of course. Now located at Mr.
    Sheldon Brown's website.

    sheldonbrown.comrinard

    sheldonbrown.comweights.htm

  5. Just remember this formula: A gram of the bike is worth five
    dollars out of your wallet (6 grams total).

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    "May you have the wind at your back. And a really low gear
    for the hills!"

    Chris Zacho ~ "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"

    Chris'Z Corner geocities.comczcorner

  6. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    Is there a database available that provides wieghts of bike
    components. When I look at various catalogs, there are
    often discrepencies from one source to another. Just as an
    example, for a Reynold Ouzo Pro 1 1/8 " fork, Excel has the
    weight as 406 gm, Colorado Cyclist has it at 425 gm, and
    Performance has it at 420. Prices, of course, are
    identical. Discrepencies abound for other components also.

    The excel catalog I just got says the listed weights are
    actual wieghts they measured using a postal scale. In the
    case of forks. the weights are with full length steerers.
    Assuming they are telling the truth, excel weights are
    probably more accurate. The other guys are just listing
    manufacturer weights.
    ------------
    Alex

  7. Quoted post said:

    Originally posted by Alex Rodriguez
    The other guys are just listing
    manufacturer weights.
    ------------
    Alex

    Sorry Alex, but Weight Weenies has forum members weigh and list weights of components

  8. On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 19:54:35 -0500 (EST), [email hidden]

    (Chris Zacho 'The Wheelman') said:

    Just remember this formula: A gram of the bike is worth
    five dollars out of your wallet (6 grams total).

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    "May you have the wind at your back. And a really low gear
    for the hills!"

    Chris Zacho ~ "Your Friendly Neighborhood Wheelman"

    Chris'Z Corner geocities.comczcorner

    Here's my weightsaving tip of the day; Swatch Irony (my
    everyday watch) 60g, $15 plastic watch from supermarket 30g.

    Kinky Cowboy*

    *Batteries not included May contain traces of nuts Your
    milage may vary

  9. In article <[email hidden]>, usenet-
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:
    Alex Rodriguez said:

    The other guys are just listing manufacturer weights.
    ------------
    Alex

    Quoted message said:

    Sorry Alex, but Weight Weenies has forum members weigh and
    list weights of components

    'other guys' was referring to the other catalogs, not weight
    weenies. I'm sure they list weights out to three digits past
    the decimal.
    ------------
    Alex

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.