Quoted post said:Originally posted by firegooroo
I shall answer that question, but real quick Splenda is not "Aspartame" Equal is. Splenda is "Dextrose, Maltodextrin, Sucralose." none of which combinded to make Aspartame. In addition Splenda comes from a synthisized raw form of sugar making it healthier than the other 2 sweetner obtions.
Fair call on that one. i suppose you use Splenda as a better carbohydrate source than the sucrose in cane sugar?
Quoted post said:Originally posted by firegooroo
Now High Fructrose Corn Syrup. This article was published in the Miami Herald on Tuesday March 2, 2004(www.herald.com)also mentioned in the South Beach Diet book authored by Dr. Agatson (www.southbeachdiet.com).
HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP: Derived from cornstarch, usually a combination of 55% fructose and 45% sucrose. Treated with an enzyme that converts glucose to fructose, which results in a sweeter product. Used in soft drinks, baked goods, jelly, syrups, fruits and desserts.
The body processes the fructose in high fructose corn syrup differently than it does old fashioned cane or bet sugar, which in turn alters the way metabolic-regulating hormones function. It also forces the liver to kick more fat out into the bloodstream. The end result is that our bodies are essentially tricked into wanting to eat more and at the same time, we are storing more fat.
yeah, i agree that studies have found n increase of trigylcerides in the blood.
Quoted post said:Originally posted by firegooroo
For each can of soda in this case Sunkist it has over 10 1/2 tspns of sugar.
whats the issue there?
Quoted post said:Originally posted by firegooroo
[B
There are other sites you can visit that can also tell you about this ingredient. As far as a cyclist and how it affects you it may be one of the leading causes to the infamous "bonk" this just leads the what has been previously stated, the bodies inability to metabolize the sugar and producing to much insulin giving you the hypoglycemia feeling. [/B]
table sugar and HFCS are quite similar anyway. Both are 50/50 split between fructose and glucose, so are you also recommending stopping using table sugar?
the problem i can see with HFCS from reading both sides of the argument on the internet is confusion over what it is. they seem to be arguing about different things. about the only study out there that is against fructose is the one regarding the rats that were feed fructose and how they died in 5 weeks instead of 2 years. the problem is that they also included that fact that they were copper deficient, which amplifies the effect of fructose.
the rats were being feed 100% fructose, not the 42 to 55% fructose in HFCS, so i dont see the relevance of the study.
HFCS is also black balled by alternative nutrition because it doesnt like GM foods, corn being one of the most commonly GM food.
I agree that fructose isnt a good carbohydrate source, just not convinced on the anti HFCS argument.