UV Rays / decrease of corneal antioxidant

And what exactly are we to make of this, how does it relate to any body of theory, to what practical
use is it, and to what goal can it be useful? Without this information it is but another random
abstract plucked from the web, one among thousands of such.

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: UV Rays / decrease of corneal antioxidant
From: [email hidden]
Date: 3/2/2004 11:06 AM Mountain Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

Physiol Res. 2004;53(1):1-10. Related Articles, Links

UV Rays, the prooxidant/antioxidant imbalance in the cornea and oxidative eye damage.

Cejkova J, Stipek S, Crkovska J, Ardan T, Platenik J, Cejka C, Midelfart A.

Department of Eye Histochemistry and Pharmacology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of
Sciences of the Czech Republic, Videnska 1083, 14220, Prague 4, Czech Republic, e-mail:
[email hidden]

In this minireview, the factors involved in the development of corneal injury due to an increased
amount of UVB rays are summarized. Experimental studies have shown that an increased number of UVB
rays leads to a profound decrease in corneal antioxidants (high molecular weight, antioxidant
enzymes as well as low molecular weight, mainly ascorbic acid) so that a prooxidant/antioxidant
imbalance appears. The decrease of corneal antioxidant protective mechanisms results in oxidative
injury of the cornea and causes damage of the inner parts of the eye by UVB rays and by reactive
oxygen species generated by them.

PMID: 14984308 [PubMed - in process]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------

Who loves ya. Tom Jesus Was A Vegetarian! jesuswasavegetarian.7h.comjesuswasavegetarian.7h.comOpen ↗ Man Is A Herbivore!
pages.ivillage.commanisaherbivoreOpen ↗ DEAD PEOPLE WALKING
pages.ivillage.comdeadpeoplewalkingOpen ↗

And what exactly are we to make of this, how does it relate to any body of theory, to what practical
use is it, and to what goal can it be useful? Without this information it is but another random
abstract plucked from the web, one among thousands of such.

Ah, now the above applies even more.

Quoted message said:

Subject: Re: UV Rays / decrease of corneal antioxidant
From: [email hidden]
Date: 3/3/2004 7:41 AM Mountain Standard Time
Message-id: <[email hidden]>

And what exactly are we to make of this, how does it relate to any body of theory, to what
practical use is it, and to what goal can it be useful? Without this information it is but another
random abstract plucked from the web, one among thousands of such.

Without the ABILITY to actually be able to understand even the simplest medical study .. such as the
one below .. I believe maybe you should find another line of work.. IF this IS your line of work.

Physiol Res. 2004;53(1):1-10. Related Articles, Links

UV Rays, the prooxidant/antioxidant imbalance in the cornea and oxidative eye damage.

Cejkova J, Stipek S, Crkovska J, Ardan T, Platenik J, Cejka C, Midelfart A.

Department of Eye Histochemistry and Pharmacology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of
Sciences of the Czech Republic, Videnska 1083, 14220, Prague 4, Czech Republic, e-mail:
[email hidden]

In this minireview, the factors involved in the development of corneal injury due to an increased
amount of UVB rays are summarized. Experimental studies have shown that an increased number of UVB
rays leads to a profound decrease in corneal antioxidants (high molecular weight, antioxidant
enzymes as well as low molecular weight, mainly ascorbic acid) so that a prooxidant/antioxidant
imbalance appears. The decrease of corneal antioxidant protective mechanisms results in oxidative
injury of the cornea and causes damage of the inner parts of the eye by UVB rays and by reactive
oxygen species generated by them.

PMID: 14984308 [PubMed - in process]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------

Who loves ya. Tom Jesus Was A Vegetarian! jesuswasavegetarian.7h.comjesuswasavegetarian.7h.comOpen ↗ Man Is A Herbivore!
pages.ivillage.commanisaherbivoreOpen ↗ DEAD PEOPLE WALKING
pages.ivillage.comdeadpeoplewalkingOpen ↗

I had no problem at all in understanding the abstract, it was in fact a rather ordinary straight
forward abstract as to concept, method, and conclusions. That perfect understanding by itself is of
no use to readers here. The research was done in and for a group who have a set of questions in
mind to which this is thought some contribution. Knowing that about the reality of what it is, the
below is even more important for you to answer: And what exactly are we to make of this, how does
it relate to any body of theory, to what practical use is it, and to what goal can it be useful?
Without this information it is but another random abstract plucked from the web, one among
thousands of such.

"Without the ABILITY to actually be able to understand even the simplest medical study .. such
as the one below .. I believe maybe you should find another line of work.. IF this IS your line
of work. "

[email hidden] [email hidden] [email hidden] Once upon a time, our fellow markd@toad-
net.com rambled on about "Re: UV Rays / decrease of corneal antioxidant." Our champion De-
Medicalizing in sci.med.nutrition retorts, thusly ...

Quoted message said:

I had no problem at all in understanding the abstract, it was in fact a rather ordinary straight
forward abstract as to concept, method, and conclusions. That perfect understanding by itself is of
no use to readers here. The research was done in and for a group who have a set of questions in
mind to which this is thought some contribution. Knowing that about the reality of what it is, the
below is even more important for you to answer: And what exactly are we to make of this, how does
it relate to any body of theory, to what practical use is it, and to what goal can it be useful?
Without this information it is but another random abstract plucked from the web, one among
thousands of such.

"Without the ABILITY to actually be able to understand even the simplest medical study .. such
as the one below .. I believe maybe you should find another line of work.. IF this IS your line
of work. "

Total [censored] from Mark 'the Toad.'

You have stated virtually nothing of any importance about this abstract.

Just thought that you might want to know. 🙂

markd, follow one of doe's links to "man is an herbivore" and read all the [censored] about how iron from
meat causes all of man's diseases. Then you'll understand the futility of arguing with such
quackery. <BLOCK!> good post about the poverty/nutrition, btw

John 'the Guy without lame headers and signatures'

<[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I had no problem at all in understanding the abstract, it was in fact a rather ordinary straight
forward abstract as to concept, method, and conclusions. That perfect understanding by itself is
of no use to readers here. The research was done in and for a group who have a set of questions in
mind to which this is thought some contribution. Knowing that about the reality of what it is, the
below is even more important for you to answer: And what exactly are we to make of this, how does
it relate to any body of theory, to what practical use is it, and to what goal can it be useful?
Without this information it is but another random abstract plucked from the web, one among
thousands of such.

"Without the ABILITY to actually be able to understand even the simplest medical study .. such
as the one below .. I believe maybe you should find another line of work.. IF this IS your line
of work. "

[email hidden] [email hidden] [email hidden] Once upon a time, our fellow John Claude
rambled on about "Re: doe." Our champion De-Medicalizing in sci.med.nutrition retorts, thusly ...

Quoted message said:

markd, follow one of doe's links to "man is an herbivore" and read all the [censored] about how iron from
meat causes all of man's diseases. Then you'll understand the futility of arguing with such
quackery. <BLOCK!> good post about the poverty/nutrition, btw

Both you science creeps have said absolutely nothing.

Ha, ... Hah, Ha!

How many degrees and how much money did it take for you to make such an obvious conclusion?

Ha, ... Hah, Ha!

Just my opinion. But, I am *right* as usual!

markd, fellow science creep, I apologize, I Should have read more of the posts. You seem to be on
top of the argument.

JC

"The Passion of the Claude"

John Claude <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

markd, follow one of doe's links to "man is an herbivore" and read all

the

Quoted message said:

[censored] about how iron from meat causes all of man's diseases. Then you'll understand the futility of
arguing with such quackery. <BLOCK!> good post about the poverty/nutrition, btw

John 'the Guy without lame headers and signatures'

<[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I had no problem at all in understanding the abstract, it was in fact a rather ordinary straight
forward abstract as to concept, method, and conclusions. That perfect understanding by itself is
of no use to

readers

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

here. The research was done in and for a group who have a set of questions in mind to which this
is thought some contribution. Knowing that about the reality of what it is, the below is even
more important

for

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

you to answer: And what exactly are we to make of this, how does it

relate

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

to any body of theory, to what practical use is it, and to what goal can it be useful? Without
this information it is but another random abstract plucked from the web, one among thousands
of such.

"Without the ABILITY to actually be able to understand even the simplest medical study .. such
as the one below .. I believe maybe you should find

another

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

line of work.. IF this IS your line of work. "

[email hidden] [email hidden] [email hidden] Once upon a time, our fellow John Claude
rambled on about "Re: doe." Our champion De-Medicalizing in sci.med.nutrition retorts, thusly ...

Quoted message said:

You seem to be on top of the argument.

Unfortunately, John 'the Clod' doesn't. 🙂
--
Mental illness happens to be real, live and well on these ngs.

Or, is it just a case of TOTALLY STUPID PEOPLE?

Are you in the bottom Quadrant of the IQ curve?

Quoted message said:

Are you in the bottom Quadrant of the IQ curve?

I'm just smart enough to find the block sender function...

Dohhhh! There are two "quadrants" in any bottom....LOL

"John Claude" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Are you in the bottom Quadrant of the IQ curve?

I'm just smart enough to find the block sender function...