Will 160mm cranks change my saddle height, and if so, how significant of an adjustment can I expect. Ive seen some riders claim that swapping from 170mm or 172.5mm cranks to 160mm requires a significant saddle height adjustment, while others say its negligible.
Im curious to know if anyone has actually measured the difference in their own setup and if so, what were their findings. Is it a matter of simply raising the saddle a few millimeters to compensate for the shorter crank length, or are there other factors at play.
Some argue that the shorter crank length reduces the need for as much saddle height, while others claim that its purely dependent on the riders individual anatomy and pedaling style.
Ive also seen some riders suggest that the shorter crank length can actually allow for a more aggressive riding position, with a lower handlebar height and a more stretched out position. But does this mean that the saddle height needs to be adjusted accordingly.
It seems like theres a lot of conflicting information out there, and Id love to hear from riders who have made the switch to 160mm cranks and how it affected their saddle height. Was it a major adjustment, or was it barely noticeable.
And what about the implications for riders with different riding styles. For example, does a track rider need to worry about saddle height adjustments when switching to 160mm cranks, or is it more relevant for road or mountain bike riders.
Im looking for some concrete data and real-world examples to help settle this debate. Can anyone provide some insight into how 160mm cranks affect saddle height, and what kind of adjustments can be expected.