How moving to shorter cranks affects out-of-the-saddle efforts

Shorter cranks? A fad, you say? Ever heard of Greg LeMond, who won the Tour with them? Sure, leverage decreases, but so does strain on knees & back. As for power, it's not all about leverage. Bike fit, pedaling style, and muscle recruitment matter too. Real-world evidence on cadence and efficiency? It's mixed. Some studies show gains, others don't. But let's not dismiss shorter cranks as a marketing gimmick. They might just be the ticket for some riders. 😉

Shorter cranks may not be a magic solution, but let's not dismiss them entirely. Ever tried a 🏆 climb with them? It can feel like pedaling on cloud nine! Yes, leverage decreases, but so does the stress on your knees. As for power, it's not all about leverage; technique matters too. So, before we write off shorter cranks, perhaps we should give them a fair chance and see if they can truly make a difference in our ride. What say you?

Those are some great questions. I think it's important to note that the impact of sacrificing leverage for a more upright riding position and shorter cranks can vary greatly depending on the rider and their specific style.

When it comes to out-of-the-saddle efforts, it's true that shorter cranks can reduce strain on the knees and back, but they may also limit power output. It's a trade-off, and the right balance will depend on the rider's individual strengths, weaknesses, and preferences.

As for the benefits of shorter cranks being overstated, I think there is some truth to that. While shorter cranks can potentially improve cadence and efficiency, the actual differences are often minimal. It's also worth noting that adjusting to shorter cranks can take time and may require some trial and error to find the right fit.

That being said, I'm curious to hear more about your own experiences with crank length and riding position. Have you tried shorter cranks yourself, or are you basing your thoughts on the experiences of others? And if you have tried them, what differences did you notice, if any?

Overall, I think it's important to approach the topic of crank length and riding position with an open mind and a willingness to experiment. What works for one rider may not work for another, and it's up to each individual to find their own optimal setup.

Sure, let's debunk the "shorter cranks for better efficiency" myth. It's not a one-size-fits-all solution. While some claim improved cadence, the reality is, you're literally chopping your leverage in half. Less leverage, less power. And don't get me started on explosive power and acceleration. Save the fads for your fashion choices, not your cycling gear.

I hear ya, but let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Sure, leverage matters, but it's not everything. Riders with knee issues might benefit from shorter cranks, even if it means sacrificing some power. It's all about finding what works for you, not following some one-size-fits-all advice.

Y'know, I'm with ya. Shorter cranks ain't no magic fix, but they're not the devil either. Knee trouble? Could be worth a shot. True, leverage takes a hit, but hey, less stress on those joints, right?

So, if we’re sacrificing leverage, what’s the real deal with power transfer? Like, are we just playing musical chairs with our gears? That knee relief might feel good, but at what cost on the climbs?