Why do so many of you still insist on using longer cranks despite the overwhelming evidence that theyre a major contributor to wrist pain, especially when riding in the hoods? Its astonishing that in this day and age, with all the advancements in bike technology, people still cling to the outdated notion that longer cranks are somehow more efficient or desirable.
Do shorter cranks really have a significant impact on reducing wrist pain when riding in the hoods, or are all the experts and studies just wrong? Is it really that hard to accept that a simple change in crank length could make a huge difference in comfort and performance? And whats with all the macho posturing about how real cyclists can handle the pain and discomfort of longer cranks?
Can anyone provide some actual data or scientific evidence to support the claim that longer cranks are superior, or are we just going to keep relying on anecdotal evidence and tradition? And while were at it, can we please put to rest the myth that shorter cranks will somehow magically make you slower or less efficient? Its time to separate fact from fiction and have a real discussion about what works best for cyclists, rather than just clinging to outdated dogma.
And to all the experts out there who claim that crank length has no effect on wrist pain, Id love to see some actual evidence to support that claim. Until then, Ill remain skeptical of anyone who insists on using longer cranks despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.