curious?

Oh!!!! so I bet its all about climbing mountains, probably the twin type ..... but not the kind of
mountains associated with this ng I suspect.

Sounds dodgy to me.

--
Sandy Saunders @ www.thewalkzone.co.uk

'Mountains or Mole Hills ... summiting still brings
the same excitement'

anjennis (ann) <[email hidden]> wrote

Quoted message said:

i've a few invites for people who live in london (or can get to regularly), are trustworthy, open-
minded and discreet. if interested and have thursday evenings free (from 8/9pm) then email me for
further details.. [email hidden] private meetings are catered for- usually on mondays.

thanks.. x

Quoted message said:

Sorry - I'm not the least interested in having tea with Ian Duncan Smith, or joining his party.
--
Gordon

In article <[email hidden]>, one of infinite monkeys

at the keyboard of 'sandy saunders said:

Oh!!!! so I bet its all about climbing mountains, probably the twin type

Is the Mount of Venus a twin type then?

(translate to latin of course:-)

--
Axis of Evil: Whose economy needs ever more wars? Arms Exports $bn: USA 14.2, UK 5.1, vs France 1.5,
Germany 0.8 (The Economist, July 2002)

In article <[email hidden]>, sandy saunders
<[email hidden]> writes

Quoted message said:

It used to be called 'Pyramid Selling'

As I understand it, in pyramid selling, there was at least a pretence of selling a product, and
they're was room for argument as to whether the scheme was legal.

It's worse than I thought from the original post, when I guessed that it was MLM.
--
Stewart Robert Hinsley If something's too good to be true it probably is.

Quoted message said:

Is the Mount of Venus a twin type then?

I suppose not ...... but maybe the Mamories, oops I mean the Mamores are.

--
Sandy Saunders @ www.thewalkzone.co.uk

'Mountains or Mole Hills ... summiting still brings
the same excitement'

a brief description, not what i'd have sent out- but an explanation nevertheless......

The invitation was to a meeting for “circle of success”. Circle of success is a gift rendering
system which sees all its members become financially stable.

There are a multitude of systems like this, which have been running for years with great success,
there are also a number of unsuccessful schemes which see people lose their money, I’m here to tell
you that this one’s genuine- not the least because I’m a member, but because it boasts added
conditions which secure your success and safety.

For those that don’t know, circle of success has (in this instance, I’d like to clarify that all
systems run by their own rules and regulations/conditions) three main levels, following is a brief
explanation;

1) You put in £500 and get two other people to join, each giving £500. Within a week
(depending on when you bring in your two people, a general rule of thumb is to be quick if
you want quick payment. No-one ever has to wait more than 3 weeks to receive, starting from
the point your second person has been acquired) you receive £4k (£4’000).

2) On payment of your £4’000, you then re-enter the circle putting in £500 and you bring in 2
people also putting in the same. (Note- in actual fact you get only £3’500 due to the £500
re-entering fee). Again within a week you get £4k.

3) Third time round you do the same as stage two, putting in £500 from your £4k and bring in
two, this time you receive £4k but you move on to the next stage. At this point from your
£10’500 received in total, you put aside £3k for the next stage.

Explanation - The Next Stage.

Because you and your immediate circle would have built enough revenue, your able to make a
progression, this progression can only be attained by completing the first stage- people are not
allowed to skip stages as these are also trial periods. If you or your group doesn’t co-operate or
hinders the safety of any members you’re immediately excluded from further progress, paid back your
£500 and you and your circle are banned for life, there will be no exceptions. Whether you or your
members (members = the people you invited and their invitees) committed the questionable act, no
evaluations will be made, you will all leave without possibility of ever re-joining.

Now On To the Next Level.

4) You put in £3’000 and bring in 2 others that do the same, within a week you get £24’000.

5) You then take £3k from your £24k to enter the next stage- bringing in two other people as
in stage 4… etc... You are paid £24k within a week.

6) Again this stage mirrors the last, with the exception that it’s finally time to enter the
last chain/stage or sequence of events. You’d now have acquired from the last three stages
= £66k for stages 4/5 and 6.

The Final Stage.

7) You put in £10’000 (from the £66k) and bring in two others that do the same, within a week
you receive £80’000.

8) You take £10k from your £80k to re-enter with your two people, and are paid within a week
your next £80k.

9) You finally take £10k from your £80k to enter for the last time, there is no next stage.
When you receive your £80k you can either retire or rejoin at the first level, putting in
£500 and bringing in two people who put in the same to get paid £4k.

This is purely a guideline, most people have trouble finding £500 to start with, due to lack of
finances, in such instances as an inviter and member I’ m willing to provide the initial £500 to
get them started but take £2k from their first receivership (“half” - I put in their money but they
find two people), the next time they re-enter they keep their £4k and can then make their
progressions unaided.

At the mere whisper of circle or putting in money etc people are naturally dubious and elect to
rubbish the whole system. Start talking about how it works and I guarantee no-one will believe you,
invite them unknowingly to a meeting and I guarantee they’ll join (or will want to- even if they
can’t afford the initial £500).

I’d like to point out that there are fees which you are required to pay, you must pay this from your
receivership money (for the £4k stage it’s £200 per receivership- which isn’t steep) because the
person that has organised and runs this system runs it from his business premises which insures full
close circuit security (continual recording and observing of events, with one button the police are
notified and respond- everything in his premises is secured against theft) which protects you and
your money.

Your best bet is to tell a group of friends you’re going out to dinner and then take them, they may
grumble at first, but at the end they’ll be smiling.

I elected to use the “not knowing, curiosity” aspect on newsgroups, not spamming- merely inviting
people to learn more and then briefly skim over the details to wet their appetite and then invite
them to the meeting. If even after attending people aren’t financially able, or are still resilient-
I’d introduce me giving them £500 to join so their experience could be risk free.

On the contrary, the reception I got in short stank! People are so quick to accuse that they lose
sight of the fact that I’m not spamming/selling/robbing/killing or aiming towards malicious intent.
I don’t see my giving people the means to join and then taking half of their first receivership gift
as criminal, infact it’s done out of good-will and not to take advantage of them. I see it more as a
means to an end, in the end everyone will benefit.

No doubt if a few of the people there could see me they’d want to stone me to death, feeling like a
prophet out to help and not hinder I was left dumbfounded and feeling immense disbelief and shock.
Which of my actions warranted such a comeback? I’m still trying to figure that one out.

By no means was I going to say so much, but after the flaming and virus attempts made on my computer
I’ve decided to close that avenue, I’ll still be inviting people to the meetings and putting up £500
for those less fortunate, but after my experience of hatred towards generosity I’m declining from
further online invites, for my safety and the safety of my circle.

"sandy saunders" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:ogNhb.24$Cf.251@newsfep4-
glfd.server.ntli.net...

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Is the Mount of Venus a twin type then?

I suppose not ...... but maybe the Mamories, oops I mean the Mamores are.

--
Sandy Saunders @ www.thewalkzone.co.uk

'Mountains or Mole Hills ... summiting still brings the same excitement'

It used to be called 'Pyramid Selling'

--
Sandy Saunders @ www.thewalkzone.co.uk

'Mountains or Mole Hills ... summiting still brings
the same excitement'

anjennis \(ann\) said:

a brief description, not what i'd have sent out- but an explanation nevertheless......

Would it not have just been easier to say a pyramid scheme?

Dewi,

(remove spin for email)

"anjennis \(ann\)" <[email hidden]> said...

Quoted message said:

a brief description, not what i'd have sent out- but an explanation nevertheless......

The invitation was to a meeting for “circle of success”. Circle of success is a gift rendering
system which sees all its members become financially stable.

OIC. He means 'scam'.
--
Fran If you need my email address please ask.

"sandy saunders" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

It used to be called 'Pyramid Selling'

--
Sandy Saunders @ www.thewalkzone.co.uk

'Mountains or Mole Hills ... summiting still brings the same excitement'

This is a 'gifting pyramid'; see dti.gov.ukpyramid.htmOpen ↗.

Not illegal yet, but will be soon. In any case, it's certainly immoral, but you might also take
the view that if someone wants to put their money into this sort of scam, they deserve to lose
it anyway.

Regards,

Pete.