does anyone have a Y-foil (58cm apprx) that they can measure for (virtual) top tube length?
thanks
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
rec.bicycles.marketplace archive · Public discussion
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
does anyone have a Y-foil (58cm apprx) that they can measure for (virtual) top tube length?
thanks
Have you called Trek?
"jim winger" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:does anyone have a Y-foil (58cm apprx) that they can measure for (virtual) top tube length?
thanks
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the geometry for the Y-foil was the same as the OCLV
of the same model year. I may have an old catalog at home -- if you can't find the info you are
looking for, e-mail and I see if I have a catalog for you. What year?
[email hidden]
Cheers. -Keith
"jim winger" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:does anyone have a Y-foil (58cm apprx) that they can measure for (virtual) top tube length?
thanks
D. Keith Arbuckle said:Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the geometry for the Y-foil was the same as the
OCLV of the same model year.
No, that's not right, the y-foil had a very different geometry.
Point your browser at groups.yahoo.comyfoilOpen ↗ and go to the "files" link. You may have
to "join" the group. The first link in the files section is a PDF doc that has the geometry for all
Trek bikes in 1998. The geometry for the y-foil was the same in 1998 and 1999.
To answer the specific question, trek produced "56", "59", and "62" sized frames:
56 59 62 TT 56.5 58.5 60.5 SA 72.0 72.0 72.0 HA 73.5 74 74 SO 30.3 31.4 34.6 (inches)
TT = top tube length SA = seat tube angle HA = head tube angle SO = standover height
Notice the rather slack seat tube angle, and keep that in mind when you compare it to other bikes,
like the regular OCLV frame.
Thanks for correcting my mistake. I guess what I had remembered was the TT lengths were
about the same.
Cheers. -Keith
"BikeRacer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:No, that's not right, the y-foil had a very different geometry.
Point your browser at groups.yahoo.comyfoilOpen ↗ and go to the "files" link. You may
have to "join" the group. The first link in the files section is a PDF doc that has the geometry
for all Trek bikes in 1998. The geometry for the y-foil was the same in 1998 and 1999.To answer the specific question, trek produced "56", "59", and "62" sized frames:
56 59 62 TT 56.5 58.5 60.5 SA 72.0 72.0 72.0 HA 73.5 74 74 SO 30.3 31.4 34.6 (inches)
TT = top tube length SA = seat tube angle HA = head tube angle SO = standover height
Notice the rather slack seat tube angle, and keep that in mind when you compare it to other bikes,
like the regular OCLV frame.
Quoted message said:Notice the rather slack seat tube angle, and keep that in mind when you compare it to other bikes,
like the regular OCLV frame.
That's because the Y-Foil was originally designed as a LeMond product and was stolen (internally)
for the TREK side of the company.
--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles chainreactionbicycles.comchainreactionbicycles.comOpen ↗
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.