rec.bicycles.marketplace archive · Public discussion

Trek Y-foil geometry?

Started by Jim Winger · · Last activity · 6 posts · 4,351 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.bicycles.marketplace archive
Published
15 January 2004
Last activity
18 January 2004
Original author
Jim Winger
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
4,351
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. does anyone have a Y-foil (58cm apprx) that they can measure for (virtual) top tube length?

    thanks

  2. Have you called Trek?

    "jim winger" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    does anyone have a Y-foil (58cm apprx) that they can measure for (virtual) top tube length?

    thanks

  3. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the geometry for the Y-foil was the same as the OCLV
    of the same model year. I may have an old catalog at home -- if you can't find the info you are
    looking for, e-mail and I see if I have a catalog for you. What year?

    [email hidden]

    Cheers. -Keith

    "jim winger" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    does anyone have a Y-foil (58cm apprx) that they can measure for (virtual) top tube length?

    thanks

  4. D. Keith Arbuckle said:

    Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the geometry for the Y-foil was the same as the
    OCLV of the same model year.

    No, that's not right, the y-foil had a very different geometry.

    Point your browser at groups.yahoo.comyfoil and go to the "files" link. You may have
    to "join" the group. The first link in the files section is a PDF doc that has the geometry for all
    Trek bikes in 1998. The geometry for the y-foil was the same in 1998 and 1999.

    To answer the specific question, trek produced "56", "59", and "62" sized frames:

    56 59 62 TT 56.5 58.5 60.5 SA 72.0 72.0 72.0 HA 73.5 74 74 SO 30.3 31.4 34.6 (inches)

    TT = top tube length SA = seat tube angle HA = head tube angle SO = standover height

    Notice the rather slack seat tube angle, and keep that in mind when you compare it to other bikes,
    like the regular OCLV frame.

  5. Thanks for correcting my mistake. I guess what I had remembered was the TT lengths were
    about the same.

    Cheers. -Keith

    "BikeRacer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    No, that's not right, the y-foil had a very different geometry.

    Point your browser at groups.yahoo.comyfoil and go to the "files" link. You may
    have to "join" the group. The first link in the files section is a PDF doc that has the geometry
    for all Trek bikes in 1998. The geometry for the y-foil was the same in 1998 and 1999.

    To answer the specific question, trek produced "56", "59", and "62" sized frames:

    56 59 62 TT 56.5 58.5 60.5 SA 72.0 72.0 72.0 HA 73.5 74 74 SO 30.3 31.4 34.6 (inches)

    TT = top tube length SA = seat tube angle HA = head tube angle SO = standover height

    Notice the rather slack seat tube angle, and keep that in mind when you compare it to other bikes,
    like the regular OCLV frame.

  6. Quoted message said:

    Notice the rather slack seat tube angle, and keep that in mind when you compare it to other bikes,
    like the regular OCLV frame.

    That's because the Y-Foil was originally designed as a LeMond product and was stolen (internally)
    for the TREK side of the company.

    --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles chainreactionbicycles.comchainreactionbicycles.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.