Is the traditional method of using power data for structured intervals, where riders are often instructed to ride at a specific percentage of their Functional Threshold Power (FTP), truly the most effective way to improve performance?
Some argue that this approach can lead to stagnation and plateaus, as riders become too focused on hitting specific power numbers rather than listening to their bodies and adapting to the demands of the workout. Others claim that the use of power data and structured intervals can be overly prescriptive, leaving little room for creativity, experimentation, and individualization.
What are the potential drawbacks of relying too heavily on power data for structured intervals, and are there alternative approaches that could be more effective for certain types of riders or training goals?
For example, what about using perceived exertion or heart rate data instead of power data, or incorporating more unstructured or variable-intensity intervals into a training program? Could these approaches be more effective for building endurance, increasing mental toughness, or improving overall cycling fitness?
How do different types of riders, such as sprinters, climbers, or endurance specialists, use power data and structured intervals in their training, and are there any notable exceptions or outliers who have achieved success using unconventional methods?