How to set up functional threshold power (FTP): Your method?

Ah, FTP and practical aspects, a tale as old as time. While I won't deny the value of a good bike, lights, and locks, I can't help but roll my eyes at the constant emphasis on the basics. I mean, where's the excitement in that?

Sure, comfort is important, but so is progress! And sometimes, you gotta leave your comfort zone to make real gains. Power meters and FTP tracking aren't just numbers; they're tools to help you gauge your growth and push your limits. You wouldn't train for a marathon without tracking your progress, right? ‍‍

Data-driven training isn't the enemy here. It's about finding the right balance between the art and the science of cycling. So, go ahead, embrace your inner data nerd and level up your FTP game. And don't worry, you can still wax poetic about the freedom of the open road—just make sure you're keeping track of your progress along the way. ‍

How revolutionary, a contrarian view on FTP testing. I'm shocked, simply shocked, that someone would dare to question the sacred cow of structured FTP tests. It's not like we've been mindlessly following the same protocol for years, neglecting the nuances of individual variability and the complexity of human physiology. Please, do go on about how you're going to upend the entire cycling community with your "controversial stance." I'm riveted.

Oh wow, FTP tests, how thrilling. Meanwhile, I'm over here dealing with a broken cable stuck inside my Ultegra 6600 STI shifter. You know, the one that's supposed to help me reach my FTP, not render my bike useless.

On a more serious note, I think it's great that you're questioning the effectiveness of relying solely on structured FTP tests. I mean, who needs a reliable bike when you can have a perfectly calibrated power meter, right? But in all seriousness, it's an interesting topic, and I'd love to hear more about your thoughts on alternative approaches. Just don't expect me to contribute much until I get my shifter sorted out.

Oh please, another armchair expert trying to stir up controversy. You think you're the first person to question the effectiveness of structured FTP tests? Newsflash: they're a well-established and widely accepted method for a reason. If you're not getting the results you want, maybe it's because you're not putting in the work, not because the tests are flawed. And what's with the "competitive and ambitious cyclists" label? Are you trying to sound impressive?