General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

supplement scammers

Started by Ted Rosenberg · · Last activity · 3 posts · 408 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
13 January 2004
Last activity
13 January 2004
Original author
Ted Rosenberg
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
408
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. THIS is an example of my biggest complaint about the US supplement scam industry!

    Diabetics are particularly at risk, because SUGAR is one of the main ingredients of all the scam
    "supplements"

    "Supplement" is a LEGAL term in the US, it means that it is illegal to claim it is a food or a
    medicine (RIGHT !!!) and, as such, can not be regulated or tested for purity or content unless it
    can be proved that it is poisonous.

    Vol. 163 No. 6, March 24, 2003 Featured Link

    Echinacea and Truth in Labeling Christine M. Gilroy, MD; John F. Steiner, MD, MPH; Tim Byers, MD,
    MPH; Howard Shapiro, PhD; William Georgian, MS

    Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:699-704.

    Background Echinacea sales represent 10% of the dietary supplement market in the United States, but
    there is no guarantee as to the content, quality, variability, or contamination in Echinacea
    preparations.

    Objective To qualitatively and quantitatively assess the contents of Echinacea-only preparations
    available in a retail setting.

    Methods One of each single-herb Echinacea preparations that were available in August 2000 was
    obtained from several stores in the Denver, Colo, area. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was used to
    determine species and measure quantity. From this information, accuracy of species labeling and
    comparison of constituent to labeled content were assessed. The samples were stratified by whether
    they were labeled as standardized, and the standardized and nonstandardized samples were compared by
    ratio of constituent to labeled content.

    Results Of the samples, 6 (10%) of 59 preparations contained no measurable Echinacea. The assayed
    species content was consistent with labeled content in 31 (52%) of the samples. Of the 21
    standardized preparations, 9 (43%) met the quality standard described on the label. Labeled
    milligrams were weakly associated with measured constituent (r = 0.35; P = .02).

    Conclusions Echinacea from retail stores often does not contain the labeled species. A claim of
    "standardization" does not mean the preparation is accurately labeled, nor does it indicate less
    variability in concentration of constituents of the herb.

    Quoted message said:

    From the Departments of General Internal Medicine (Drs


    Gilroy and Steiner), Preventive Medicine and Biometrics (Dr Byers), Preventive Medicine and
    Biometrics (Dr Shapiro), University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver; HealthONE Alliance,
    Denver (Drs Gilroy and Shapiro); and S&W Microchemical, East Lyme, Conn (Mr Georgian). The authors
    have no relevant financial interest in this article.

  2. Just got some Vitamin C and found each tablet had 3 grams of carbs. Wrong brand! Nan, Type 2

  3. "Ted Rosenberg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    THIS is an example of my biggest complaint about the US


    supplement scam

    Quoted message said:

    industry!

    Diabetics are particularly at risk, because SUGAR is one of the


    main

    Quoted message said:

    ingredients of all the scam "supplements"

    "Supplement" is a LEGAL term in the US, it means that it is


    illegal to

    Quoted message said:

    claim it is a food or a medicine (RIGHT !!!) and, as such, can not


    be

    Quoted message said:

    regulated or tested for purity or content unless it can be proved


    that

    Quoted message said:

    it is poisonous.

    Vol. 163 No. 6, March 24, 2003 Featured Link

    Echinacea and Truth in Labeling Christine M. Gilroy, MD; John F. Steiner, MD, MPH; Tim Byers, MD,
    MPH; Howard Shapiro, PhD; William Georgian, MS

    Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:699-704.

    Background Echinacea sales represent 10% of the dietary supplement market in the United States,
    but there is no guarantee as to the content, quality, variability, or contamination in Echinacea
    preparations.

    Objective To qualitatively and quantitatively assess the contents of Echinacea-only preparations
    available in a retail setting.

    Methods One of each single-herb Echinacea preparations that were available in August 2000 was
    obtained from several stores in the Denver, Colo, area. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was used
    to determine species and measure quantity. From this information, accuracy of species labeling and
    comparison of constituent to labeled content were assessed. The samples were stratified by whether
    they were labeled as standardized, and the standardized and nonstandardized samples were compared
    by ratio of constituent to labeled content.

    Results Of the samples, 6 (10%) of 59 preparations contained no measurable Echinacea. The assayed
    species content was consistent with labeled content in 31 (52%) of the samples. Of the 21
    standardized preparations, 9 (43%) met the quality standard described on the label. Labeled
    milligrams were weakly associated with measured constituent (r = 0.35; P = .02).

    Conclusions Echinacea from retail stores often does not contain the labeled species. A claim of
    "standardization" does not mean the preparation is accurately labeled, nor does it indicate less
    variability in concentration of constituents of the herb.

    Quoted message said:

    From the Departments of General Internal Medicine (Drs


    Gilroy and Steiner), Preventive Medicine and Biometrics (Dr Byers), Preventive Medicine and
    Biometrics (Dr Shapiro), University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver; HealthONE
    Alliance, Denver (Drs Gilroy and Shapiro); and S&W Microchemical, East Lyme, Conn (Mr Georgian).
    The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.

    Hi there Ted,

    In Australia, we have one of the best regulatory authorities in the world (The Therapeutic Goods
    Authority), when it comes to supps and such things. Despite this, a lot of supps and herbs are not
    what they purport to be.

    During the recent PAN scandal and subsequent investigations, many things were withdrawn from
    sale, and a lot had their actual ingredients published on the internet. I was saddened to find
    that the Alpha Lipoic Acid supps I was taking only had a tiny fraction of the ALA claimed to be
    in the capsules. The bulk of the capsule was filled with soy oil. And it was VERY expensive too!
    Rotten sods.

    I'm not one for a lot of supps, but that one seemed like a good idea at the time, from reading
    research that indicated it's value for diabetics. Ripped off, I was.

    At one time I was suffering from mild depression, and thought I'd try the much touted St John's
    Wort, and bought a bottle of pills. It did nothing. More recently I bought some dried herb of the
    same substance - and it nearly blew my socks off, it was so powerful. Yes, it worked, but also had
    some unpleasant side effects. So I reckon, forget it! I'm OK now anyway. BTW, prescribed medications
    gave me even nastier side effects. What I really needed was good glycemic control. That's when I was
    "cured" of the chronic depression.

    We live and learn. YMMV - so consult your doctor about *any* OTC treatments.

    Take care folks. It's a jungle out there.

    Annette

    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (grisoft.comgrisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.538 / Virus Database: 333 - Release Date: 11/11/03

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.