have new enthusiasm for trying to make his lousy trick work. Here's the essence of it.
1. "vegans" are upset that animals are killed for human consumption (we'll ignore the MASSIVE
"vegan" hypocrisy in that for a moment, as it has been adequately addressed elsewhere by
numerous others.)
2. "vegans" don't eat meat, in order not to contribute to this form of animal death: animals
deliberately killed by humans in order to consume the animal products. Their goal is to cause
fewer animals to be bred and raised and slaughtered than would be the case if these people
consumed animal products.
half year period shows, that wanting to eliminate farm animals is a morally bad thing. He wants
to persuade "vegans" that they should stop being "vegans".
experience life" argument is full of holes, so he does a little switcheroo, thinking no one
will notice: he cynically suggests that people can have an impact on the lives of animals that
DO exist, by being so-called "ethical" or "conscientious" consumers. There are three big
problems with this:
preaches. He buys meat without regard to the quality of lives of the animals raised to
produce it. He is a massive hypocrite.
b. He can't address "vegans'" beliefs about the deliberate killing of farm animals. They feel
try to persuade them it isn't; he simply offers his own biased belief that it isn't.
trick! No one is fooled into thinking that
life of farm animals who DO live; he quite obviously is trying to trick the "vegans" into
supporting life per se for farm animals.
in over four years. He's a moron.