quackwatch.comquackwatch.comOpen ↗
--
Find Dzogvi Gzboli in www.google.com
General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
Quackwatch
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- General fitness, health and nutrition
- Published
- 4 January 2004
- Last activity
- 6 January 2004
- Original author
- Dzogvi Gzboli
- Posts
- 8
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 954
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Quoted message said:
My question is - Who monitors Quackwatch? I bet they would of ridiculed homocysteine, oxidative
stress, and nitric oxide in relation to disease processes in the past because they were not
"mainstream". No thank you - I'll do my own research and come to my own conclusions. There will
always be fraud but chopping out the knees of anything "outside of the box" is not my idea of
innovative science.Chuck Balzer, MS RD
-
A finer strawman in so few words have we not seen before, congrats. All the info he presents has the
references on which it is based clearly shown. Anyone's "own research" must take that base of
research into account. If you have info to consider that might support that any of his material
doesn't point to being a quack, then present it here for our consideration.Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
My question is - Who monitors Quackwatch? I bet they would of ridiculed homocysteine, oxidative
stress, and nitric oxide in relation to disease processes in the past because they were not
"mainstream". No thank you - I'll do my own research and come to my own conclusions. There will
always be fraud but chopping out the knees of anything "outside of the box" is not my idea of
innovative science.Chuck Balzer, MS RD
-
Once upon a time, our fellow [email hidden] rambled on about "Re: Quackwatch." Our champion De-
Medicalizing in sci.med.nutrition retorts, thusly ...Quoted message said:
A finer strawman in so few words have we not seen before, congrats. All the info he presents has
the references on which it is based clearly shown. Anyone's "own research" must take that base of
research into account. If you have info to consider that might support that any of his material
doesn't point to being a quack, then present it here for our consideration.Huh?
Do you mind restating that hogwash in plain English, so that us non-scientists may further
appreciate your nonsense?Ha, ... Hah, Ha!
Just thought that you might want to know. 🙂
-
On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 14:36:55 -0800, Dzogvi Gzboli
Quoted message said:
This site is dreadful. The bigotry on this site is the equal and opposite of the worst hype from
commercial vitamin sites.George M Carter
-
In article <[email hidden]>, Dzogvi
Gzboli said:
Truth -- and beauty -- are in the mind of the beholder. Pax.
-
"GeorgeSugmad" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>, Dzogvi Gzboli
Quoted message said:
Truth -- and beauty -- are in the mind of the beholder. Pax.
<plonk>
M.
-
Once upon a time, our fellow Mark D. rambled on about "Re: Quackwatch." Our champion De-Medicalizing
in sci.med.nutrition retorts, thusly ...bug you got stuck up your [censored]! And, boy it is a big one. 🙁
You have my condolences.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.